Right Ventricular Myocardial Work Predicts Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure Rise During Exercise in Heart Failure

Kuan-Chih Huang MD, PhD , Ting-Tse Lin MD, PhD , Lung-Chun Lin MD, PhD , Lian-Yu Lin MD, PhD , Cho-kai Wu MD, PhD
{"title":"Right Ventricular Myocardial Work Predicts Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure Rise During Exercise in Heart Failure","authors":"Kuan-Chih Huang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ting-Tse Lin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lung-Chun Lin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lian-Yu Lin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Cho-kai Wu MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Symptoms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are closely related to exercise-induced elevation in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). However, the diagnostic role of right ventricular (RV) myocardial work in HFpEF remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of RV myocardial work in HFpEF and their correlation with PCWP during exercise.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with unexplained dyspnea underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise tests to identify HFpEF. Echocardiography assessed left and right ventricular parameters. RV myocardial work was calculated using strain rate and pressure curves, matched with electrocardiography data. RV global constructive work, RV global work index, RV global wasted work (RVGWW), and RV global work efficiency (RVGWE) were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-one patients with adequate data were enrolled, with 21 diagnosed with HFpEF. No significant differences in various echocardiographic parameters were found between HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups, except higher postexercise PCWP and mean pulmonary artery pressure in HFpEF patients. HFpEF patients had higher RVGWW and lower RVGWE. RVGWW and RVGWE demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for HFpEF compared to other echocardiographic parameters, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73-0.97) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96), respectively. RV global constructive work (r = 0.504; <em>P</em> = 0.001) and RVGWW (r = 0.621; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) correlated with postexercise ΔPCWP and exercise PCWP, with RVGWW independently associated with both after adjustment for confounding factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RVGWW is a novel predictive parameter that provides a better explanation of RV performance regarding postexercise ΔPCWP than other standard echocardiographic parameters in HFpEF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 8","pages":"Article 101905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25003254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Symptoms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are closely related to exercise-induced elevation in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). However, the diagnostic role of right ventricular (RV) myocardial work in HFpEF remains unclear.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of RV myocardial work in HFpEF and their correlation with PCWP during exercise.

Methods

Patients with unexplained dyspnea underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise tests to identify HFpEF. Echocardiography assessed left and right ventricular parameters. RV myocardial work was calculated using strain rate and pressure curves, matched with electrocardiography data. RV global constructive work, RV global work index, RV global wasted work (RVGWW), and RV global work efficiency (RVGWE) were analyzed.

Results

Forty-one patients with adequate data were enrolled, with 21 diagnosed with HFpEF. No significant differences in various echocardiographic parameters were found between HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups, except higher postexercise PCWP and mean pulmonary artery pressure in HFpEF patients. HFpEF patients had higher RVGWW and lower RVGWE. RVGWW and RVGWE demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for HFpEF compared to other echocardiographic parameters, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73-0.97) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96), respectively. RV global constructive work (r = 0.504; P = 0.001) and RVGWW (r = 0.621; P < 0.001) correlated with postexercise ΔPCWP and exercise PCWP, with RVGWW independently associated with both after adjustment for confounding factors.

Conclusions

RVGWW is a novel predictive parameter that provides a better explanation of RV performance regarding postexercise ΔPCWP than other standard echocardiographic parameters in HFpEF.
心衰患者运动时右心室心肌功预测肺毛细血管楔压升高
背景:心力衰竭伴保留射血分数(HFpEF)的症状与运动引起的肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)升高密切相关。然而,右心室(RV)心肌功在HFpEF中的诊断作用尚不清楚。目的评价运动时右心室心肌功对HFpEF的诊断价值及其与PCWP的相关性。方法对不明原因呼吸困难患者进行有创心肺运动试验,以确定HFpEF。超声心动图评估左、右心室参数。用应变率和压力曲线计算右心室心肌功,并与心电图数据相匹配。分析了RV全球建设性工作、RV全球工作指数、RV全球浪费工作(RVGWW)和RV全球工作效率(RVGWE)。结果纳入41例资料充足的患者,其中21例诊断为HFpEF。除HFpEF组运动后PCWP和平均肺动脉压较高外,HFpEF组与非HFpEF组的各项超声心动图参数均无显著差异。HFpEF患者RVGWW较高,RVGWE较低。与其他超声心动图参数相比,RVGWW和RVGWE对HFpEF的诊断效果更好,受者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.85 (95% CI: 0.73-0.97)和0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96)。RV整体建设工作(r = 0.504;P = 0.001)和RVGWW (r = 0.621;P & lt;0.001)与运动后ΔPCWP和运动PCWP相关,RVGWW在调整混杂因素后与两者独立相关。结论srvgww是一种新的预测参数,与其他标准超声心动图参数相比,它能更好地解释运动后RV的表现ΔPCWP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信