{"title":"Should the police use genetic genealogy databases to assist in solving crime? Survey among university students","authors":"Hannah Marlor, Kate Randall, Aaron Opoku Amankwaa","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2025.103317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Genetic genealogy databases have been utilised as a novel tool by law enforcement to generate leads in difficult criminal investigations. This technique involves searching ancestry databases that contain voluntarily uploaded DNA to identify genetic relatives of unknown suspects. The arrest of the notorious Golden State Killer using this method in 2018 brought the use of these techniques into the public eye. However, public perspectives on whether law enforcement should be granted access to this information is understudied. This study explored the attitudes towards police access to genetic genealogy amongst 373 university students through an online survey. Overall, students expressed moderate conditional support, with higher support levels for investigation of violent crimes (76 %) and crimes against children (78 %) compared to reluctant support for non-violent crimes (60 %). Women displayed greater support than men for police access (<em>p</em> < 0.05) in cases of violent crime (86 % vs. 75 %), crimes against children (87 % vs. 72 %), missing persons (84 % vs 76 %), and identifying human remains (88 % vs 78 %). Younger students aged 18–24 exhibited higher support for police access for violent crimes and missing persons cases than older students aged 35–50 (<em>p</em> < 0.05) (85 % vs. 76 %, and 86 % vs. 72 %, respectively). Qualitative findings emphasised participants’ desire for oversight and protecting individual rights through warrant requirements to prevent overreach, whilst allowing societal benefits. This study provides initial evidence that educated young people recognise the potential forensic value of police access to genetic genealogy but favour strict regulations that reflect crime severity. This data can inform policy debates and legislative frameworks, balancing the utility and ethics of emerging genetic technologies. Further research across diverse populations is required to guide well informed legislations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497325000973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Genetic genealogy databases have been utilised as a novel tool by law enforcement to generate leads in difficult criminal investigations. This technique involves searching ancestry databases that contain voluntarily uploaded DNA to identify genetic relatives of unknown suspects. The arrest of the notorious Golden State Killer using this method in 2018 brought the use of these techniques into the public eye. However, public perspectives on whether law enforcement should be granted access to this information is understudied. This study explored the attitudes towards police access to genetic genealogy amongst 373 university students through an online survey. Overall, students expressed moderate conditional support, with higher support levels for investigation of violent crimes (76 %) and crimes against children (78 %) compared to reluctant support for non-violent crimes (60 %). Women displayed greater support than men for police access (p < 0.05) in cases of violent crime (86 % vs. 75 %), crimes against children (87 % vs. 72 %), missing persons (84 % vs 76 %), and identifying human remains (88 % vs 78 %). Younger students aged 18–24 exhibited higher support for police access for violent crimes and missing persons cases than older students aged 35–50 (p < 0.05) (85 % vs. 76 %, and 86 % vs. 72 %, respectively). Qualitative findings emphasised participants’ desire for oversight and protecting individual rights through warrant requirements to prevent overreach, whilst allowing societal benefits. This study provides initial evidence that educated young people recognise the potential forensic value of police access to genetic genealogy but favour strict regulations that reflect crime severity. This data can inform policy debates and legislative frameworks, balancing the utility and ethics of emerging genetic technologies. Further research across diverse populations is required to guide well informed legislations.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts.
The scope of the journal includes:
Forensic applications of human polymorphism.
Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies.
Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms.
Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications.
Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation.
Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest.
Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems.
DNA typing methodologies and strategies.
Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics.
Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches.
Standards in forensic genetics.
Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards.
Quality control.
Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies.
Criminal DNA databases.
Technical, legal and statistical issues.
General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.