Micro-CT and histological evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation with Bio-Oss® and THE Graft®: A randomized controlled trial

Q3 Medicine
Lurong Jia , Tong Wang , Kai Dong , Quanlin Chen , Chao Wang , Wenjuan Zhou , Zhonghao Liu
{"title":"Micro-CT and histological evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation with Bio-Oss® and THE Graft®: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Lurong Jia ,&nbsp;Tong Wang ,&nbsp;Kai Dong ,&nbsp;Quanlin Chen ,&nbsp;Chao Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhonghao Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.medntd.2025.100377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare volumetric changes and histological characteristics of new bone in extraction sockets grafted with Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®. Furthermore, it sought to further assess the quality and quantity of bone regeneration at 3- and 6-month intervals. Thirty-two patients requiring single-tooth extraction (excluding third molars) and ridge preservation in preparation for subsequent implant placement were randomized to receive either graft material (Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®) covered by a collagen membrane. At 3 months, BV/TV was higher in the DBBM groups than in the DPBM groups, while mineralized bone proportions were similar between groups. By 6 months, BV/TV remained significantly higher in DPBM groups than in the DBBM groups, and a higher proportion of mineralized bone was observed in the DPBM groups. Both groups showed increasing BV/TV and mineralized bone over time. In conclusion, both Bio-Oss® and THE Graft® effectively promoted socket bone regeneration, with healing time influencing bone formation. Long-term results suggest THE Graft® may enhance mineralized bone percentage more than Bio-Oss®.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33783,"journal":{"name":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093525000281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare volumetric changes and histological characteristics of new bone in extraction sockets grafted with Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®. Furthermore, it sought to further assess the quality and quantity of bone regeneration at 3- and 6-month intervals. Thirty-two patients requiring single-tooth extraction (excluding third molars) and ridge preservation in preparation for subsequent implant placement were randomized to receive either graft material (Bio-Oss® or THE Graft®) covered by a collagen membrane. At 3 months, BV/TV was higher in the DBBM groups than in the DPBM groups, while mineralized bone proportions were similar between groups. By 6 months, BV/TV remained significantly higher in DPBM groups than in the DBBM groups, and a higher proportion of mineralized bone was observed in the DPBM groups. Both groups showed increasing BV/TV and mineralized bone over time. In conclusion, both Bio-Oss® and THE Graft® effectively promoted socket bone regeneration, with healing time influencing bone formation. Long-term results suggest THE Graft® may enhance mineralized bone percentage more than Bio-Oss®.
Bio-Oss®和THE Graft®对牙槽嵴保存的显微ct和组织学评价:一项随机对照试验
这项随机临床试验旨在比较Bio-Oss®或THE Graft®移植的拔牙槽内新骨的体积变化和组织学特征。此外,它试图进一步评估骨再生的质量和数量在3个月和6个月的间隔。32名需要单牙拔牙(不包括第三磨牙)和牙脊保存以准备后续种植体放置的患者随机接受胶原膜覆盖的移植物材料(Bio-Oss®或THE graft®)。3个月时,DBBM组BV/TV高于DPBM组,而矿化骨比例组间相似。6个月时,DPBM组BV/TV仍显著高于DBBM组,且DPBM组矿化骨比例较高。随着时间的推移,两组的BV/TV和骨矿化都有所增加。总之,Bio-Oss®和THE Graft®均能有效促进窝骨再生,愈合时间影响骨形成。长期结果表明THE Graft®比Bio-Oss®更能提高矿化骨百分比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信