Clean fuels and cognitive protection: a robustness analysis of the impact of declining self-care ability on cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ling Zhang , Junzhou Xu
{"title":"Clean fuels and cognitive protection: a robustness analysis of the impact of declining self-care ability on cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults","authors":"Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Junzhou Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to investigate the impact of different types of cooking fuels (solid fuel vs. clean fuel) on cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults, with particular attention to the moderating role of self-care ability. To enhance the credibility of the findings, robustness checks using Bootstrap, quantile regression, and weighted analysis were employed.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This study employs a cross-sectional design. Data were sourced from the 2020 from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a nationally representative survey covering the health and living conditions of middle-aged and older adults. The final sample included 18,715 participants, with 4,927 households using solid fuels and 13,788 households using clean fuels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cognitive function was assessed using standardized tests, and the type of cooking fuel and self-care ability were recorded. Multivariate regression models were used to analyze the relationship between fuel type and cognitive function, including interaction terms to explore the moderating effect of self-care ability. Multiple robustness checks were conducted to validate the main findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study found that, even after controlling for various confounding factors, the use of clean fuels was associated with better cognitive function. However, as self-care ability declined, the negative impact of solid fuels on cognitive function increased, and the protective effect of clean fuels diminished. Specifically, individuals who required partial or complete assistance had significantly lower cognitive function scores than those who were fully independent. Robustness analyses supported these findings, indicating the stability and reliability of the results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates that the choice of cooking fuel has significant implications for cognitive health in middle-aged and older adults, with the effect moderated by self-care ability. For individuals with poorer self-care ability, the use of clean fuels may be particularly important to reduce the risk of cognitive decline. These findings provide scientific evidence for public health interventions targeted at different levels of self-care ability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 105817"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062500263X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to investigate the impact of different types of cooking fuels (solid fuel vs. clean fuel) on cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults, with particular attention to the moderating role of self-care ability. To enhance the credibility of the findings, robustness checks using Bootstrap, quantile regression, and weighted analysis were employed.

Study design

This study employs a cross-sectional design. Data were sourced from the 2020 from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a nationally representative survey covering the health and living conditions of middle-aged and older adults. The final sample included 18,715 participants, with 4,927 households using solid fuels and 13,788 households using clean fuels.

Methods

Cognitive function was assessed using standardized tests, and the type of cooking fuel and self-care ability were recorded. Multivariate regression models were used to analyze the relationship between fuel type and cognitive function, including interaction terms to explore the moderating effect of self-care ability. Multiple robustness checks were conducted to validate the main findings.

Results

The study found that, even after controlling for various confounding factors, the use of clean fuels was associated with better cognitive function. However, as self-care ability declined, the negative impact of solid fuels on cognitive function increased, and the protective effect of clean fuels diminished. Specifically, individuals who required partial or complete assistance had significantly lower cognitive function scores than those who were fully independent. Robustness analyses supported these findings, indicating the stability and reliability of the results.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the choice of cooking fuel has significant implications for cognitive health in middle-aged and older adults, with the effect moderated by self-care ability. For individuals with poorer self-care ability, the use of clean fuels may be particularly important to reduce the risk of cognitive decline. These findings provide scientific evidence for public health interventions targeted at different levels of self-care ability.
清洁燃料和认知保护:中老年人自我照顾能力下降对认知功能影响的稳健性分析
目的探讨不同类型的烹饪燃料(固体燃料和清洁燃料)对中老年人认知功能的影响,特别关注自我照顾能力的调节作用。为了提高研究结果的可信度,采用Bootstrap、分位数回归和加权分析进行稳健性检查。研究设计本研究采用横断面设计。数据来自2020年中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS),这是一项具有全国代表性的调查,涵盖了中老年人的健康和生活状况。最终样本包括18715名参与者,其中4927个家庭使用固体燃料,13788个家庭使用清洁燃料。方法采用标准化测试评估患者的认知功能,记录烹调燃料种类和自理能力。采用多元回归模型分析燃料类型与认知功能的关系,包括交互项,探讨自我照顾能力的调节作用。进行了多次稳健性检查以验证主要发现。结果研究发现,即使在控制了各种混杂因素之后,使用清洁燃料与更好的认知功能有关。然而,随着自我照顾能力的下降,固体燃料对认知功能的负面影响增加,清洁燃料的保护作用减弱。具体来说,需要部分或完全帮助的个体的认知功能得分明显低于完全独立的个体。稳健性分析支持这些发现,表明结果的稳定性和可靠性。结论烹调燃料的选择对中老年人的认知健康有显著影响,并受自我照顾能力的调节。对于自我照顾能力较差的人来说,使用清洁燃料对于降低认知能力下降的风险可能特别重要。这些发现为针对不同水平自我保健能力的公共卫生干预提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信