Examining links between daily stressor appraisals and C-reactive protein levels in Black and White women: The National Growth and Health Study

IF 3.7 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Sarah E. Ahmadi , Joanna Y. Guan , Meital Mashash , Elissa J. Hamlat , Mahasin S. Mujahid , A. Janet Tomiyama , Barbara A. Laraia , Elissa S. Epel , Stefanie E. Mayer
{"title":"Examining links between daily stressor appraisals and C-reactive protein levels in Black and White women: The National Growth and Health Study","authors":"Sarah E. Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Joanna Y. Guan ,&nbsp;Meital Mashash ,&nbsp;Elissa J. Hamlat ,&nbsp;Mahasin S. Mujahid ,&nbsp;A. Janet Tomiyama ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Laraia ,&nbsp;Elissa S. Epel ,&nbsp;Stefanie E. Mayer","doi":"10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Racial disparities in health have reached a critical juncture, particularly between Black and White individuals. Inflammation and daily stress have been proposed as biopsychological pathways. However, studies examining links between inflammation and individuals' appraisals of daily stressors—which are modifiable and could be intervention targets—have been limited in diverse populations. This study investigated these associations in a sample of Black and White women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Midlife women (159 Black, 163 White) were part of a prospective cohort study in which they completed daily evening diaries assessing appraisals of daily stressor demands and coping efficacy (feeling in control, efficacious, resourceful). Participants also provided a fasting blood sample which was assessed for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), a systemic inflammatory marker. Multiple linear regression models examined associations between race, daily stressor appraisals, and interactions with hs-CRP, controlling for education, income, and body mass index. Race-stratified models were also examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The interaction between race and coping efficacy, but not stressor demands, was significantly associated with hs-CRP. Specifically, more positive appraisal of coping efficacy was linked with lower hs-CRP levels in White women (<em>Beta</em> = −0.147, <em>p</em> = .024), but not in Black women (<em>Beta</em> = 0.078, <em>p</em> = .226).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>For White women, greater perceived coping efficacy with daily stressors may buffer stress-related inflammation, providing a promising intervention target. Given the scarcity of daily stress research with diverse samples, we need to better measure and understand these relationships in Black samples and other racial and ethnic groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72454,"journal":{"name":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101035"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354625000936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Racial disparities in health have reached a critical juncture, particularly between Black and White individuals. Inflammation and daily stress have been proposed as biopsychological pathways. However, studies examining links between inflammation and individuals' appraisals of daily stressors—which are modifiable and could be intervention targets—have been limited in diverse populations. This study investigated these associations in a sample of Black and White women.

Methods

Midlife women (159 Black, 163 White) were part of a prospective cohort study in which they completed daily evening diaries assessing appraisals of daily stressor demands and coping efficacy (feeling in control, efficacious, resourceful). Participants also provided a fasting blood sample which was assessed for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), a systemic inflammatory marker. Multiple linear regression models examined associations between race, daily stressor appraisals, and interactions with hs-CRP, controlling for education, income, and body mass index. Race-stratified models were also examined.

Results

The interaction between race and coping efficacy, but not stressor demands, was significantly associated with hs-CRP. Specifically, more positive appraisal of coping efficacy was linked with lower hs-CRP levels in White women (Beta = −0.147, p = .024), but not in Black women (Beta = 0.078, p = .226).

Discussion

For White women, greater perceived coping efficacy with daily stressors may buffer stress-related inflammation, providing a promising intervention target. Given the scarcity of daily stress research with diverse samples, we need to better measure and understand these relationships in Black samples and other racial and ethnic groups.
检查黑人和白人妇女每日压力源评估和c反应蛋白水平之间的联系:国家生长和健康研究
健康方面的种族差异,特别是黑人和白人之间的差异,已经到了一个关键时刻。炎症和日常压力被认为是生物心理途径。然而,在不同的人群中,研究炎症和个人对日常压力的评估之间的联系——这些评估是可以修改的,可以成为干预目标——的研究受到了限制。这项研究在黑人和白人女性样本中调查了这些关联。方法对159名黑人、163名白人中年妇女进行了前瞻性队列研究,她们完成了每日晚间日记,评估每日压力源需求和应对效能(控制感、有效性、足智多谋感)。参与者还提供了空腹血液样本,用于评估高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP),这是一种全身炎症标志物。多元线性回归模型检验了种族、每日压力源评估和hs-CRP相互作用之间的关系,控制了教育、收入和体重指数。种族分层模型也进行了检验。结果种族与应对效能的交互作用与hs-CRP相关,而应激源需求与hs-CRP无关。具体来说,白人女性对应对效能的正面评价与较低的hs-CRP水平相关(Beta值= - 0.147,p = 0.024),而黑人女性则无关(Beta值= 0.078,p = 0.226)。对于白人女性来说,更高的应对日常压力的效能可能会缓冲压力相关的炎症,这提供了一个有希望的干预目标。鉴于日常压力研究缺乏不同样本,我们需要更好地衡量和理解黑人样本和其他种族和族裔群体的这些关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
97 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信