Recent Outcomes Research in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review of Publication-Year 2024 Additions to the Helicopter Outcomes Assessment Research Database

Q3 Nursing
Christie L. Fritz MD, MS , Caroline E. Thomas BS , Michael Skaggs MD, MS , Lincoln Zernicke MD , Michael Patrick McCartin MD , Ira J. Blumen MD , James Price MBBS , Owen Hibberd MBBS , David W. Schoenfeld MD, MPH , Stephen H. Thomas MD, MPH
{"title":"Recent Outcomes Research in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review of Publication-Year 2024 Additions to the Helicopter Outcomes Assessment Research Database","authors":"Christie L. Fritz MD, MS ,&nbsp;Caroline E. Thomas BS ,&nbsp;Michael Skaggs MD, MS ,&nbsp;Lincoln Zernicke MD ,&nbsp;Michael Patrick McCartin MD ,&nbsp;Ira J. Blumen MD ,&nbsp;James Price MBBS ,&nbsp;Owen Hibberd MBBS ,&nbsp;David W. Schoenfeld MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Stephen H. Thomas MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review is an annual update of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) outcomes literature added to the HEMS outcomes assessment research database (HOARD). HOARD is maintained by the critical care transport collaborative outcomes research effort (CCT CORE) and is updated each year with the previous calendar year’s studies assessing whether HEMS use alters patient-centered outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we used multiple reviewers of records retrieved from multiple medical and gray literature sources: Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Eligible for review was HEMS vs. ground EMS outcomes studies either published or appearing in preprint databases during calendar year 2024. HOARD excludes case reports and review articles (unless they provide a new calculation of effect estimate). We assessed articles for subject matter (trauma vs non-trauma), journal impact factor (JIF), and geographic region of the study’s correspondence author. Categorical analyses comparing 2024 studies with HOARD studies from 2023 were executed with Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, and we also calculated risk ratio with its 95% confidence interval. Non-normal JIF data were described using median and interquartile range and analyzed using rank sum testing. Nonparametric trend testing evaluated the last decade’s evidence using Cochrane-Armitage (dichotomous) or Cuzick (JIF) testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of an initial records of <em>N</em> = 5,179 (74 of which were reviewed as full text), we identified 21 studies for addition to HOARD. Longitudinal analysis revealed a significant (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) annual trend toward increasing proportions of studies focusing on non-trauma; 2024 was the first time in a decade that the more than half of the year’s outcomes studies focused on non-trauma. There was no indication of trend involving the proportion of studies emanating from the USA (<em>P</em> = .821) or from the combined countries of USA and Europe (<em>P</em> = .566). The 2024 JIF had a median of 2.11 and interquartile range of 1.25 to 2.60. There was no suggestion (<em>P</em> = .919) of longitudinal JIF trend in the past decade.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This scoping review provides information on 21 HEMS outcomes studies new to the evidence base in 2024. The HOARD database, freely available, has been updated with these studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"44 4","pages":"Pages 306-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X25001063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This scoping review is an annual update of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) outcomes literature added to the HEMS outcomes assessment research database (HOARD). HOARD is maintained by the critical care transport collaborative outcomes research effort (CCT CORE) and is updated each year with the previous calendar year’s studies assessing whether HEMS use alters patient-centered outcomes.

Methods

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we used multiple reviewers of records retrieved from multiple medical and gray literature sources: Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Eligible for review was HEMS vs. ground EMS outcomes studies either published or appearing in preprint databases during calendar year 2024. HOARD excludes case reports and review articles (unless they provide a new calculation of effect estimate). We assessed articles for subject matter (trauma vs non-trauma), journal impact factor (JIF), and geographic region of the study’s correspondence author. Categorical analyses comparing 2024 studies with HOARD studies from 2023 were executed with Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, and we also calculated risk ratio with its 95% confidence interval. Non-normal JIF data were described using median and interquartile range and analyzed using rank sum testing. Nonparametric trend testing evaluated the last decade’s evidence using Cochrane-Armitage (dichotomous) or Cuzick (JIF) testing.

Results

Of an initial records of N = 5,179 (74 of which were reviewed as full text), we identified 21 studies for addition to HOARD. Longitudinal analysis revealed a significant (P < .001) annual trend toward increasing proportions of studies focusing on non-trauma; 2024 was the first time in a decade that the more than half of the year’s outcomes studies focused on non-trauma. There was no indication of trend involving the proportion of studies emanating from the USA (P = .821) or from the combined countries of USA and Europe (P = .566). The 2024 JIF had a median of 2.11 and interquartile range of 1.25 to 2.60. There was no suggestion (P = .919) of longitudinal JIF trend in the past decade.

Conclusion

This scoping review provides information on 21 HEMS outcomes studies new to the evidence base in 2024. The HOARD database, freely available, has been updated with these studies.
直升机紧急医疗服务的最新成果研究:对《直升机成果评估研究数据库》2024年增刊的范围审查
目的:本综述是对直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)结果评估研究数据库(HOARD)中新增的相关文献进行年度更新。HOARD由重症监护运输合作结果研究工作(CCT CORE)维护,每年根据前一个日历年的研究更新,评估使用HEMS是否会改变以患者为中心的结果。方法根据系统评价和meta分析范围评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南,我们从多个医学文献和灰色文献来源(Medline (PubMed)、EMBASE、Scopus、CINAHL和谷歌Scholar)中检索了记录,并使用了多个审稿人。符合审查条件的是在2024日历年发表或出现在预印本数据库中的HEMS与地面EMS的结果研究。HOARD不包括病例报告和综述文章(除非它们提供了新的效果估计计算方法)。我们评估了文章的主题(创伤与非创伤)、期刊影响因子(JIF)和研究通信作者的地理区域。将2024年的研究与2023年的HOARD研究进行分类分析,采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,并以95%置信区间计算风险比。非正态JIF数据使用中位数和四分位数范围描述,并使用秩和检验进行分析。非参数趋势检验使用Cochrane-Armitage(二分法)或Cuzick (JIF)检验来评估过去十年的证据。结果在初始记录N = 5179(其中74项作为全文审阅)中,我们确定了21项研究添加到HOARD中。纵向分析显示显著(P <;.001)关注非创伤研究的比例逐年增加的趋势;2024年是十年来第一次有超过一半的研究结果集中在非创伤上。没有迹象表明来自美国(P = .821)或来自美国和欧洲联合国家(P = .566)的研究比例有趋势。2024年JIF的中位数为2.11,四分位数区间为1.25至2.60。近10年JIF的纵向变化趋势不存在(P = .919)。结论本综述提供了2024年新纳入证据库的21项HEMS结局研究的信息。免费提供的HOARD数据库已根据这些研究进行了更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信