{"title":"Synergistic effects of Emblica officinalis with optimized synbiotic formulation on the growth and neonatal health of Murrah buffalo calves","authors":"Antony Johnson Thanippilly , Sachin Kumar , Sravani Balaga, Ashis Kumar Samanta","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study was conducted to determine the synergistic effect of <em>Emblica officinalis</em> with optimized synbiotic formulation (<em>Cichorium intybus</em> and <em>Ligilactobacillus salivarius</em> BF17) on the growth, faecal microbiota, antioxidant and immunological status of <em>Murrah</em> buffalo calves. A synbiotic (comprising <em>Cichorium intybus</em> and <em>Lg. salivarius</em> BF17) and the phytobiotic powder of <em>Emblica officinalis</em> were selected for an animal experimental duration of 60 days. Twenty <em>Murrah</em> buffalo calves (5–7 days old) were assigned in a completely randomized design into four treatment groups as follows: Group I served as control (CON) supplemented with basal diet only, and Group II (SYN) was fed a synbiotic formulation comprising <em>Lg. salivarius</em> BF17 at 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/g/d/calf and <em>Cichorium intybus L.</em> (chicory) root powder at 8 g/d/calf; Group III (PHY) was provided with phytobiotic <em>Emblica officinalis</em> powder at 8 g/d/calf; and Group IV (COMB) received a combination consisting of synbiotic (<em>Lg. salivarius</em> BF17 and <em>Cichorium intybus)</em>, and phytobiotic <em>Emblica officinalis</em> powder at similar doses. Body weight (BW) was recorded weekly. Faecal score was recorded daily, whereas faecal pH and faecal microbiota were estimated fortnightly. Faecal metabolites and antioxidant status was estimated at monthly intervals. The results revealed that the COMB group performed best in terms of growth, followed by the SYN and PHY groups, whereas the CON group had the lowest performance. In contrast to those in the CON group, all the supplemented groups showed a decrease (P < 0.05) in the faecal pH, faecal score, and ammonia concentration along with concurrent increases in the faecal lactate and short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) levels and further, the beneficial effects were more pronounced in the COMB group. Faecal <em>Lactobacillus</em> and <em>Bifidobacterium</em> population were significantly (P < 0.05) greater in the COMB, SYN, and PHY groups than the CON group, with a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in <em>E. coli</em> counts in the COMB and PHY groups. Super oxide dismutase (SOD) activity and immunological status (humoral immune response and cell mediated immune response) were greater (P < 0.05) in the COMB group than the CON group. Overall, this study revealed that <em>Emblica officinalis</em> has synergistic effects with synbiotic and improves the growth and neonatal health of <em>Murrah</em> buffalo calves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 116423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the synergistic effect of Emblica officinalis with optimized synbiotic formulation (Cichorium intybus and Ligilactobacillus salivarius BF17) on the growth, faecal microbiota, antioxidant and immunological status of Murrah buffalo calves. A synbiotic (comprising Cichorium intybus and Lg. salivarius BF17) and the phytobiotic powder of Emblica officinalis were selected for an animal experimental duration of 60 days. Twenty Murrah buffalo calves (5–7 days old) were assigned in a completely randomized design into four treatment groups as follows: Group I served as control (CON) supplemented with basal diet only, and Group II (SYN) was fed a synbiotic formulation comprising Lg. salivarius BF17 at 108 CFU/g/d/calf and Cichorium intybus L. (chicory) root powder at 8 g/d/calf; Group III (PHY) was provided with phytobiotic Emblica officinalis powder at 8 g/d/calf; and Group IV (COMB) received a combination consisting of synbiotic (Lg. salivarius BF17 and Cichorium intybus), and phytobiotic Emblica officinalis powder at similar doses. Body weight (BW) was recorded weekly. Faecal score was recorded daily, whereas faecal pH and faecal microbiota were estimated fortnightly. Faecal metabolites and antioxidant status was estimated at monthly intervals. The results revealed that the COMB group performed best in terms of growth, followed by the SYN and PHY groups, whereas the CON group had the lowest performance. In contrast to those in the CON group, all the supplemented groups showed a decrease (P < 0.05) in the faecal pH, faecal score, and ammonia concentration along with concurrent increases in the faecal lactate and short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) levels and further, the beneficial effects were more pronounced in the COMB group. Faecal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium population were significantly (P < 0.05) greater in the COMB, SYN, and PHY groups than the CON group, with a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in E. coli counts in the COMB and PHY groups. Super oxide dismutase (SOD) activity and immunological status (humoral immune response and cell mediated immune response) were greater (P < 0.05) in the COMB group than the CON group. Overall, this study revealed that Emblica officinalis has synergistic effects with synbiotic and improves the growth and neonatal health of Murrah buffalo calves.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.