Multidomain interventions for preventing cognitive decline in older adults with type 2 diabetes and mild cognitive impairment: Secondary analysis of the J-MINT: Multidomain intervention in type 2 diabetes.
{"title":"Multidomain interventions for preventing cognitive decline in older adults with type 2 diabetes and mild cognitive impairment: Secondary analysis of the J-MINT: Multidomain intervention in type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Taiki Sugimoto, Paul K Crane, Seo-Eun Choi, Kosuke Fujita, Jeanne Gallée, Yujiro Kuroda, Michael Lee, Nanae Matsumoto, Akinori Nakamura, Hisashi Noma, Takuya Omura, Ayaka Onoyama, Phoebe Scollard, Kazuaki Uchida, Yoko Yokoyama, Hidenori Arai, Takashi Sakurai","doi":"10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify subgroups who may be more likely to respond well to a multidomain intervention among older adults with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of the Japan Multimodal Intervention Trial for Prevention of Dementia. A total 531 participants aged 65-85 years with mild cognitive impairment were randomized into intervention (vascular risk management, exercise, nutritional counseling, and cognitive training) and control (health-related information) groups. The outcome was the change in average Z scores of neuropsychological tests from baseline to 18 months. Interactions between intervention and age (65-74, 75-85 years), memory impairment (amnestic, nonamnestic), HbA1c levels (within, outside target range), or <i>APOE</i> genotype (0, ≥1 <i>APOE</i> ε4 alleles) among participants with diabetes were evaluated using the mixed-effects model for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 76 participants with diabetes, a significant age × intervention interaction (<i>P</i> = 0.007) was found, which was driven by benefits in the younger age group (Z score difference: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.55) that were not observed in the older age group. Intervention benefits were also detected in those with HbA1c levels outside the target range (Z score difference: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.56), with HbA1c levels × intervention interaction (<i>P</i> = 0.021). No significant interactions were detected between intervention and memory impairment or <i>APOE</i> genotype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidomain interventions may benefit younger older adults or those with overly strict or lenient HbA1c control; however, these findings need confirmation in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73537,"journal":{"name":"JAR life","volume":"14 ","pages":"100016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAR life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To identify subgroups who may be more likely to respond well to a multidomain intervention among older adults with type 2 diabetes.
Materials and methods: This study was a secondary analysis of the Japan Multimodal Intervention Trial for Prevention of Dementia. A total 531 participants aged 65-85 years with mild cognitive impairment were randomized into intervention (vascular risk management, exercise, nutritional counseling, and cognitive training) and control (health-related information) groups. The outcome was the change in average Z scores of neuropsychological tests from baseline to 18 months. Interactions between intervention and age (65-74, 75-85 years), memory impairment (amnestic, nonamnestic), HbA1c levels (within, outside target range), or APOE genotype (0, ≥1 APOE ε4 alleles) among participants with diabetes were evaluated using the mixed-effects model for repeated measures.
Results: Among 76 participants with diabetes, a significant age × intervention interaction (P = 0.007) was found, which was driven by benefits in the younger age group (Z score difference: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.55) that were not observed in the older age group. Intervention benefits were also detected in those with HbA1c levels outside the target range (Z score difference: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.56), with HbA1c levels × intervention interaction (P = 0.021). No significant interactions were detected between intervention and memory impairment or APOE genotype.
Conclusions: Multidomain interventions may benefit younger older adults or those with overly strict or lenient HbA1c control; however, these findings need confirmation in future studies.