Liuju Su, Min Zhou, Xiulin Wen, Yuan Guo, Bao Li, Liqun Luo, Qian Xiao, Jingrong Wang
{"title":"Analysis of the Current Status of Perceived Stress and Factors Associated with It in Patients with Chronic Wounds: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Liuju Su, Min Zhou, Xiulin Wen, Yuan Guo, Bao Li, Liqun Luo, Qian Xiao, Jingrong Wang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S509414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess perceived stress levels in patients with chronic wounds and examine the associations between perceived stress and demographic factors, clinical characteristics, wound healing status, social support, and coping styles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study from December 2023 to August 2024 at the Wound Care Clinic of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. A convenience sampling method was used to recruit 292 patients with chronic wounds who received standardized wound treatment. Data were collected using the general information questionnaire, Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS), Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). Statistical analysis utilized Spearman correlation and multiple linear regression to identify factors associated with perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean perceived stress score among the 292 participants was 34.98±7.03, with 78.8% reporting clinically significant stress (score>28). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation between perceived stress and marital status, comorbid chronic diseases, and wound healing status in patients with chronic wounds. Patients who were married, had multiple chronic diseases, or exhibited poor wound healing tended to have higher perceived stress. Conversely, social support and positive coping maintained inverse relationships with perceived stress, suggesting that patients with strong social support and positive coping style experienced lower stress levels. Together, these factors accounted for 42.7% of the variance in perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic wound patients commonly exhibit moderate-to-high levels of perceived stress. Healthcare providers should systematically assess patients' perceived stress levels and implement individualized interventions, including enhancing social support networks and teaching positive coping strategies, to alleviate perceived stress and ultimately improve wound healing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1947-1957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S509414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess perceived stress levels in patients with chronic wounds and examine the associations between perceived stress and demographic factors, clinical characteristics, wound healing status, social support, and coping styles.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from December 2023 to August 2024 at the Wound Care Clinic of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. A convenience sampling method was used to recruit 292 patients with chronic wounds who received standardized wound treatment. Data were collected using the general information questionnaire, Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS), Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). Statistical analysis utilized Spearman correlation and multiple linear regression to identify factors associated with perceived stress.
Results: The mean perceived stress score among the 292 participants was 34.98±7.03, with 78.8% reporting clinically significant stress (score>28). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation between perceived stress and marital status, comorbid chronic diseases, and wound healing status in patients with chronic wounds. Patients who were married, had multiple chronic diseases, or exhibited poor wound healing tended to have higher perceived stress. Conversely, social support and positive coping maintained inverse relationships with perceived stress, suggesting that patients with strong social support and positive coping style experienced lower stress levels. Together, these factors accounted for 42.7% of the variance in perceived stress.
Conclusion: Chronic wound patients commonly exhibit moderate-to-high levels of perceived stress. Healthcare providers should systematically assess patients' perceived stress levels and implement individualized interventions, including enhancing social support networks and teaching positive coping strategies, to alleviate perceived stress and ultimately improve wound healing outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.