Cavitation threshold in the porcine crystalline lens.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Clement Foullounoux, Frederic Mascarelli, Philippe Gain, Gilles Thuret, Cyril Lafon, Maxime Lafond
{"title":"Cavitation threshold in the porcine crystalline lens.","authors":"Clement Foullounoux, Frederic Mascarelli, Philippe Gain, Gilles Thuret, Cyril Lafon, Maxime Lafond","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate ultrasonic cavitation thresholds in young (6 months) and old (2-6 years) porcine crystalline lenses using a 2 MHz transducer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For cavitation threshold estimation, five to nine samples were exposed to bursts of different peak negative pressures from 20.6 to 36.1 MPa with duty cycles (DCs) of 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.1% and subsequently 0.000006% at maximum output. Cavitation signals were recorded and their energies were calculated. The cavitation events percentage was estimated through the detection of energy values outside 5 standard deviations from the mean value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cavitation thresholds were estimated at -31.7 MPa for a 0.1% DC but severe cataracts were observed. In order to determine a therapeutic application, a more suitable ultrasound scheme using an ultra-low DC (0.6e<sup>-5</sup>%, 12 cycles at 1 Hz PRF) was used and a cavitation threshold was determined at -36.1 MPa. In that case, no cataract was observed on a macroscopic scale. Nevertheless, important variations in cavitation thresholds between samples and the two tested populations were observed, most likely due to variations in viscoelastic properties, water content distribution, temperature increases and age disparity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results show a trend toward higher cavitation probability while increasing the negative pressure at that focus. However, no significant differences in cavitation events percentage could be observed due to the limited sample size. Ultra-low DC results show the feasibility of cavitation nucleation while reducing heat deposition. The safety aspect needs to be explored further.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.05.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate ultrasonic cavitation thresholds in young (6 months) and old (2-6 years) porcine crystalline lenses using a 2 MHz transducer.

Methods: For cavitation threshold estimation, five to nine samples were exposed to bursts of different peak negative pressures from 20.6 to 36.1 MPa with duty cycles (DCs) of 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.1% and subsequently 0.000006% at maximum output. Cavitation signals were recorded and their energies were calculated. The cavitation events percentage was estimated through the detection of energy values outside 5 standard deviations from the mean value.

Results: Cavitation thresholds were estimated at -31.7 MPa for a 0.1% DC but severe cataracts were observed. In order to determine a therapeutic application, a more suitable ultrasound scheme using an ultra-low DC (0.6e-5%, 12 cycles at 1 Hz PRF) was used and a cavitation threshold was determined at -36.1 MPa. In that case, no cataract was observed on a macroscopic scale. Nevertheless, important variations in cavitation thresholds between samples and the two tested populations were observed, most likely due to variations in viscoelastic properties, water content distribution, temperature increases and age disparity.

Conclusion: The results show a trend toward higher cavitation probability while increasing the negative pressure at that focus. However, no significant differences in cavitation events percentage could be observed due to the limited sample size. Ultra-low DC results show the feasibility of cavitation nucleation while reducing heat deposition. The safety aspect needs to be explored further.

猪晶体的空化阈值。
目的:用2mhz换能器评价幼年(6个月)和老年(2-6岁)猪晶体的超声空化阈值。方法:为了估计空化阈值,将5 ~ 9个样品暴露在20.6 ~ 36.1 MPa的不同峰值负压下,最大输出时的占空比分别为0.025%、0.05%、0.1%和0.000006%。记录空化信号并计算其能量。通过检测离平均值5个标准差以外的能量值来估计空化事件百分比。结果:0.1% DC的空化阈值估计为-31.7 MPa,但观察到严重的白内障。为了确定治疗应用,使用了一种更合适的超低直流超声方案(0.65 -5%,12个周期,1 Hz PRF),并确定了-36.1 MPa的空化阈值。该病例肉眼未见白内障。然而,观察到样品和两个测试群体之间的空化阈值存在重要差异,这很可能是由于粘弹性特性、含水量分布、温度升高和年龄差异的差异。结论:随着该病灶负压的增大,空化概率呈增大趋势。然而,由于样本量有限,未观察到空化事件百分比的显著差异。超低直流结果表明,在减少热沉积的同时进行空化成核是可行的。安全方面需要进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信