[Application of precise-guided temporary fixation assistive devices in proximal femoral nail antirotation fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures].

Q3 Medicine
Wanming Qu, Hongbin Zhou, Xiangwei Zhang, Qinghua Xiang, Wenbin Shen, Xin Yu, Wenyao Chen, Xinzhi Li
{"title":"[Application of precise-guided temporary fixation assistive devices in proximal femoral nail antirotation fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures].","authors":"Wanming Qu, Hongbin Zhou, Xiangwei Zhang, Qinghua Xiang, Wenbin Shen, Xin Yu, Wenyao Chen, Xinzhi Li","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202503125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of precise-guided temporary fixation assistive devices in assisting the main nail guide pin placement and precise temporary fixation in proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 60 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures over 65 years old who met the selection criteria between January 2020 and June 2022 and were treated with PFNA internal fixation. The patients were randomly divided into the trial group (auxiliary device guided main nail guide pin placement and temporary fixation) and the control group (conventional treatment), with 30 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, fracture side, AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, and combined medical diseases between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The operation time, times of main nail guide pin placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative blood transfusion were recorded and compared between the two groups. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by CHANG Shimin <i>et al</i> criteria. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function at 1 year after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the trial group, 2 temporary fixation needles were successfully placed 2-5 times, including 2 times in 13 cases (43.3%), 3 times in 8 cases (26.7%), 4 times in 7 cases (23.3%), and 5 times in 2 cases (6.7%). The operation time, times of main nail guide pin placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and intraoperative blood loss in the trial group were significantly less than those in the control group, and the reduction quality score was significantly better than that in the control group ( <i>P</i><0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative blood transfusion between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 15 months). There was no complication such as incision infection, deep vein thrombosis, or internal fixation loosening. At 1 year after operation, the Harris score of the affected hip joint in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group ( <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The technique of main nail guide pin placement and temporary fixation under the guidance of auxiliary devices in PFNA internal fixation can achieve faster insertion of the main nail guide pin, accurate temporary fixation to maintain reduction, and avoid the subsequent operation space, so as to improve the effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 6","pages":"680-685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202503125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of precise-guided temporary fixation assistive devices in assisting the main nail guide pin placement and precise temporary fixation in proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 60 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures over 65 years old who met the selection criteria between January 2020 and June 2022 and were treated with PFNA internal fixation. The patients were randomly divided into the trial group (auxiliary device guided main nail guide pin placement and temporary fixation) and the control group (conventional treatment), with 30 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, fracture side, AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, and combined medical diseases between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, times of main nail guide pin placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative blood transfusion were recorded and compared between the two groups. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by CHANG Shimin et al criteria. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function at 1 year after operation.

Results: In the trial group, 2 temporary fixation needles were successfully placed 2-5 times, including 2 times in 13 cases (43.3%), 3 times in 8 cases (26.7%), 4 times in 7 cases (23.3%), and 5 times in 2 cases (6.7%). The operation time, times of main nail guide pin placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and intraoperative blood loss in the trial group were significantly less than those in the control group, and the reduction quality score was significantly better than that in the control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative blood transfusion between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 15 months). There was no complication such as incision infection, deep vein thrombosis, or internal fixation loosening. At 1 year after operation, the Harris score of the affected hip joint in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group ( P<0.05).

Conclusion: The technique of main nail guide pin placement and temporary fixation under the guidance of auxiliary devices in PFNA internal fixation can achieve faster insertion of the main nail guide pin, accurate temporary fixation to maintain reduction, and avoid the subsequent operation space, so as to improve the effectiveness.

[精确引导临时固定辅助装置在股骨粗隆间骨折股骨近端钉防旋转固定中的应用]。
目的:探讨精确引导临时固定辅助装置在股骨粗隆间骨折股骨近端防旋转(PFNA)内固定中辅助主钉引导钉置入和精确临时固定的可行性和有效性。方法:采用前瞻性随机对照研究,分析2020年1月至2022年6月期间符合入选标准的60例65岁以上股骨粗隆间骨折患者,采用PFNA内固定治疗的临床资料。将患者随机分为试验组(辅助装置引导主钉引导针置入并临时固定)和对照组(常规治疗),每组30例。两组患者在性别、年龄、损伤原因、损伤至手术时间、骨折侧、AO/骨科创伤协会(AO/OTA)分类、合并内科疾病等基线资料差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。记录两组手术时间、主钉引导针置入次数、术中透视次数、术中出血量、围术期输血情况并进行比较。骨折复位质量按照常世民等标准进行评价。Harris评分用于评估术后1年的髋关节功能。结果:试验组2枚临时固定针成功放置2 ~ 5次,其中2次13例(43.3%),3次8例(26.7%),4次7例(23.3%),5次2例(6.7%)。试验组手术时间、主钉引导针置入次数、术中透视次数、术中出血量均显著少于对照组,复位质量评分显著优于对照组(PP>0.05)。所有患者随访12-19个月(平均15个月)。无切口感染、深静脉血栓形成、内固定松动等并发症。术后1年,试验组患髋关节Harris评分明显高于对照组(p结论:PFNA内固定采用辅助装置引导下主钉引导针置入临时固定技术,可实现主钉引导针快速插入,准确临时固定保持复位,避免后续手术空间,提高疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信