[Effectiveness of three-needle and two-cable structure in treatment of inferior patellar pole avulsion fractures].

Q3 Medicine
Cheng Duan, Jie Cheng
{"title":"[Effectiveness of three-needle and two-cable structure in treatment of inferior patellar pole avulsion fractures].","authors":"Cheng Duan, Jie Cheng","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202504011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of three-needle and two-cable structure in the treatment of inferior patellar pole avulsion fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical data of 62 patients with inferior patellar pole avulsion fractures who were admitted between January 2023 and December 2023 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, the fractures were fixed with three-needle and two-cable structure in 32 patients (observation group) and traditional steel wire tension band in 30 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in the baseline data of age, gender, side of the affected limb, cause of injury, and disease duration between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The operation time, fracture healing and healing time, patellar height (Insall-Salvati index), occurrence of complications, knee range of motion, and Böstman score at last follow-up were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group ( <i>P</i><0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 10.4 months). X-ray films re-examination showed that all fractures healed, and the fracture healing time was significantly shorter in observation group than in control group ( <i>P</i><0.05); no significant difference was found in Insall-Salvati index between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). During follow-up, the complications occurred in 2 cases (6.25%) of observation group and in 9 cases (30.00%) of control group, and the difference in the incidences between the two groups was significant ( <i>P</i><0.05). At last follow-up, the range of motion and Böstman score of the knee joint in observation group were significantly superior to control group ( <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the traditional steel wire tension band fixation, the three-needle and two-cable structure fixation of the inferior patellar pole avulsion fractures is firm, which allows the knee joint to move early after operation and is conducive to the recovery of knee joint function.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 6","pages":"686-691"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202504011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of three-needle and two-cable structure in the treatment of inferior patellar pole avulsion fractures.

Methods: A clinical data of 62 patients with inferior patellar pole avulsion fractures who were admitted between January 2023 and December 2023 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, the fractures were fixed with three-needle and two-cable structure in 32 patients (observation group) and traditional steel wire tension band in 30 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in the baseline data of age, gender, side of the affected limb, cause of injury, and disease duration between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, fracture healing and healing time, patellar height (Insall-Salvati index), occurrence of complications, knee range of motion, and Böstman score at last follow-up were compared between the two groups.

Results: The operation time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group ( P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 10.4 months). X-ray films re-examination showed that all fractures healed, and the fracture healing time was significantly shorter in observation group than in control group ( P<0.05); no significant difference was found in Insall-Salvati index between the two groups ( P>0.05). During follow-up, the complications occurred in 2 cases (6.25%) of observation group and in 9 cases (30.00%) of control group, and the difference in the incidences between the two groups was significant ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the range of motion and Böstman score of the knee joint in observation group were significantly superior to control group ( P<0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with the traditional steel wire tension band fixation, the three-needle and two-cable structure fixation of the inferior patellar pole avulsion fractures is firm, which allows the knee joint to move early after operation and is conducive to the recovery of knee joint function.

[三针双缆结构治疗髌骨下极撕脱骨折的疗效]。
目的:探讨三针双缆结构治疗髌骨下极撕脱骨折的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2023年1月至2023年12月收治的62例符合入选标准的髌骨下极撕脱骨折患者的临床资料。其中32例(观察组)采用三针双缆结构固定,30例(对照组)采用传统钢丝张力带固定。两组患者的年龄、性别、患肢侧边、损伤原因、病程等基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。比较两组手术时间、骨折愈合及愈合时间、髌骨高度(Insall-Salvati指数)、并发症发生情况、膝关节活动范围、末次随访Böstman评分。结果:观察组手术时间明显短于对照组(PPP>0.05)。随访期间,观察组出现并发症2例(6.25%),对照组出现并发症9例(30.00%),两组发生率比较差异有统计学意义(ppp)。与传统钢丝张力带固定相比,髌下极撕脱骨折的三针双缆结构固定牢固,可使膝关节术后早期活动,有利于膝关节功能的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信