Cognitive impairment and quality of life in patients with carotid artery stenosis pre-revascularization: a scoping review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mohammad Minwer Alnaeem
{"title":"Cognitive impairment and quality of life in patients with carotid artery stenosis pre-revascularization: a scoping review.","authors":"Mohammad Minwer Alnaeem","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2523907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) reduces cerebral blood flow and is frequently associated with cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life (QoL), particularly in severe CAS. Although carotid revascularization (stenting or endarterectomy) can improve blood flow and potentially enhance cognitive function and QoL, the impact of CAS before revascularization remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to synthesize the literature exploring the relationship between CAS, cognitive impairment, and QoL, focusing on pre-revascularization outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive scoping review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, EBSCO, and Scopus to identify relevant studies published between 2015 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review identified consistent evidence linking severe CAS (≥70%) to significant cognitive decline, particularly in areas such as memory, attention, and executive function. Although carotid revascularization showed promise in improving cognitive performance, the extent of recovery varied. Studies also highlighted the profound impact of CAS on QoL, with patients frequently experiencing anxiety, depression, and physical limitations. While revascularization procedures were associated with improvements in physical functioning and overall well-being, emotional recovery often delayed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAS substantially affects both cognitive functioning and QoL, even before revascularization. Although some studies suggested that revascularization may lead to improvements in cerebral perfusion and certain domains of cognitive function, the trajectory of psychosocial and emotional recovery; including depressive symptoms, anxiety, and fear of future cerebrovascular events, demonstrates delayed improvement. These emotional outcomes mediate overall QoL and should be a focus of both clinical assessment and future longitudinal studies. Standardization of cognitive and psychosocial outcome measures is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2523907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) reduces cerebral blood flow and is frequently associated with cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life (QoL), particularly in severe CAS. Although carotid revascularization (stenting or endarterectomy) can improve blood flow and potentially enhance cognitive function and QoL, the impact of CAS before revascularization remains unclear.

Objective: This review aimed to synthesize the literature exploring the relationship between CAS, cognitive impairment, and QoL, focusing on pre-revascularization outcomes.

Method: A comprehensive scoping review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, EBSCO, and Scopus to identify relevant studies published between 2015 and 2023.

Results: This review identified consistent evidence linking severe CAS (≥70%) to significant cognitive decline, particularly in areas such as memory, attention, and executive function. Although carotid revascularization showed promise in improving cognitive performance, the extent of recovery varied. Studies also highlighted the profound impact of CAS on QoL, with patients frequently experiencing anxiety, depression, and physical limitations. While revascularization procedures were associated with improvements in physical functioning and overall well-being, emotional recovery often delayed.

Conclusion: CAS substantially affects both cognitive functioning and QoL, even before revascularization. Although some studies suggested that revascularization may lead to improvements in cerebral perfusion and certain domains of cognitive function, the trajectory of psychosocial and emotional recovery; including depressive symptoms, anxiety, and fear of future cerebrovascular events, demonstrates delayed improvement. These emotional outcomes mediate overall QoL and should be a focus of both clinical assessment and future longitudinal studies. Standardization of cognitive and psychosocial outcome measures is essential.

颈动脉狭窄患者血运重建术前的认知障碍和生活质量:一项范围综述。
背景:颈动脉狭窄(CAS)减少脑血流量,经常与认知障碍和生活质量(QoL)下降有关,特别是在严重的CAS中。尽管颈动脉血管重建术(支架置入或动脉内膜切除术)可以改善血流量并潜在地增强认知功能和生活质量,但血管重建术前CAS的影响尚不清楚。目的:本综述旨在综合探讨CAS、认知功能障碍和生活质量之间关系的文献,重点关注血运重建前的预后。方法:通过PubMed、CINAHL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、EBSCO、Scopus等数据库对2015 - 2023年间发表的相关研究进行全面的文献综述。结果:本综述发现了一致的证据,表明严重的CAS(≥70%)与显著的认知能力下降有关,特别是在记忆、注意力和执行功能等领域。尽管颈动脉血运重建术显示出改善认知能力的希望,但恢复的程度各不相同。研究还强调了CAS对生活质量的深远影响,患者经常出现焦虑、抑郁和身体限制。虽然血运重建手术与身体功能和整体健康状况的改善有关,但情绪恢复往往会延迟。结论:即使在血运重建术之前,CAS也会显著影响认知功能和生活质量。尽管一些研究表明血运重建可能导致脑灌注和某些认知功能领域的改善,但社会心理和情绪恢复的轨迹;包括抑郁症状、焦虑和对未来脑血管事件的恐惧,表现为延迟改善。这些情绪结果调节整体生活质量,应成为临床评估和未来纵向研究的重点。认知和社会心理结果测量的标准化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Research
Neurological Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields. The scope of the journal includes: •Stem cell applications •Molecular neuroscience •Neuropharmacology •Neuroradiology •Neurochemistry •Biomathematical models •Endovascular neurosurgery •Innovation in neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信