Pregnancy outcome in women with hearing disability: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1080/01443615.2025.2519379
Hui Zhang, Yue Du, Jianwei Qiu, Yu Wang, Yinjing Song
{"title":"Pregnancy outcome in women with hearing disability: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hui Zhang, Yue Du, Jianwei Qiu, Yu Wang, Yinjing Song","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2025.2519379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hearing disabilities are a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to analyse the impact of hearing impairment on maternal and neonatal outcomes, and to evaluate the adequacy of prenatal care among women diagnosed with hearing disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant studies published in English was performed. Two researchers independently performed screening and quality assessments. Adverse maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and caesarean delivery), adverse neonatal outcomes (preterm birth and low birth weight), and utilisation of prenatal care resources were primary outcomes of this review. A comparative effects meta-analysis and a narrative synthesis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies comprising 97,251,223 participants, of whom 63,387 had a hearing disability, were included in this review. Meta-analysis revealed a significantly higher risk for gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, eclampsia, caesarean delivery, placental abruption, preterm birth, low birth weight, and adequate-plus utilisation of prenatal care resources. The results were similar in the sensitivity analyses based on different statistical models. There were no statistical differences in pooled estimates of the incidence of chorioamnionitis, although a significantly higher risk was observed when the model was modified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to women without disabilities, those with hearing disabilities exhibited a higher risk for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes and excessive use of prenatal care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2519379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2519379","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hearing disabilities are a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to analyse the impact of hearing impairment on maternal and neonatal outcomes, and to evaluate the adequacy of prenatal care among women diagnosed with hearing disabilities.

Methods: A literature search of the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant studies published in English was performed. Two researchers independently performed screening and quality assessments. Adverse maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and caesarean delivery), adverse neonatal outcomes (preterm birth and low birth weight), and utilisation of prenatal care resources were primary outcomes of this review. A comparative effects meta-analysis and a narrative synthesis were performed.

Results: Ten retrospective cohort studies comprising 97,251,223 participants, of whom 63,387 had a hearing disability, were included in this review. Meta-analysis revealed a significantly higher risk for gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, eclampsia, caesarean delivery, placental abruption, preterm birth, low birth weight, and adequate-plus utilisation of prenatal care resources. The results were similar in the sensitivity analyses based on different statistical models. There were no statistical differences in pooled estimates of the incidence of chorioamnionitis, although a significantly higher risk was observed when the model was modified.

Conclusion: Compared to women without disabilities, those with hearing disabilities exhibited a higher risk for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes and excessive use of prenatal care services.

听力障碍妇女的妊娠结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:听力障碍是不良妊娠结局的重要危险因素。本研究旨在分析听力障碍对孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响,并评估诊断为听力障碍的妇女产前护理的充分性。方法:检索PubMed、Medline、Cochrane Library、Embase和Scopus数据库中已发表的相关英文文献。两名研究人员独立进行了筛选和质量评估。不良的产妇结局(妊娠糖尿病、先兆子痫和剖腹产)、不良的新生儿结局(早产和低出生体重)以及产前护理资源的利用是本综述的主要结局。进行了比较效应荟萃分析和叙事综合。结果:本综述纳入了10项回顾性队列研究,包括97251223名参与者,其中63387名有听力障碍。荟萃分析显示,妊娠期糖尿病、先兆子痫、子痫、剖腹产、胎盘早剥、早产、低出生体重和产前护理资源充分利用的风险显著增加。基于不同统计模型的敏感性分析结果相似。在绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率的汇总估计中没有统计学差异,尽管在模型修改后观察到明显更高的风险。结论:与无残疾妇女相比,听力残疾妇女出现不良母婴结局和过度使用产前护理服务的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
398
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信