Evaluating the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy on biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hsiao-Chun Su, Ching-Chia Li, Wei-Ming Li, Hsin-Chih Yeh, Hung-Lung Ke, Wen-Jeng Wu, Tsu Ming Chien, Sheng-Chen Wen, Yen-Chun Wang, Hsiang-Ying Lee
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy on biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Hsiao-Chun Su, Ching-Chia Li, Wei-Ming Li, Hsin-Chih Yeh, Hung-Lung Ke, Wen-Jeng Wu, Tsu Ming Chien, Sheng-Chen Wen, Yen-Chun Wang, Hsiang-Ying Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.06.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates the correlations between positive surgical margins (PSMs) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 111 patients who underwent RP between 2011 and 2020 was subjected to comprehensive analysis. Clinicopathological and laboratory data were collected to evaluate the influence of Gleason score (GS) and different PSM sites on BCR-free survival following RP. Various statistical analyses, including the Chi-square test, student's t-test, Cox regression models, and the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) model, were employed to examine the impact of these factors on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IPTW model revealed a consistent reduction in the risk of BCR among patients who received adjuvant therapy, irrespective of age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, or the presence of lymphatic vascular invasion (LVI). Within the subgroup receiving adjuvant therapy, factors such as pathological GS≥8 (p<0.0001), pathological tumor stage (pT stage) beyond T3 (p<0.0001), presence of perineural invasion (PNI) (p<0.0001), utilization of a robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP) surgical approach (p<0.0001), and involvement of apical or multifocal PSM sites (p=0.0042 and 0.0054) were identified as significantly associated with the observed protective effect of adjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the importance of identifying apical PSMs, as their presence is associated with an elevated risk of BCR. Administering timely adjuvant therapy to patients with apical PSMs emerges as a potential strategy to improve outcomes. Nevertheless, further research is warranted to refine clinical decision-making and treatment approaches in light of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.06.036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the correlations between positive surgical margins (PSMs) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods: A cohort of 111 patients who underwent RP between 2011 and 2020 was subjected to comprehensive analysis. Clinicopathological and laboratory data were collected to evaluate the influence of Gleason score (GS) and different PSM sites on BCR-free survival following RP. Various statistical analyses, including the Chi-square test, student's t-test, Cox regression models, and the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) model, were employed to examine the impact of these factors on patient outcomes.

Results: The IPTW model revealed a consistent reduction in the risk of BCR among patients who received adjuvant therapy, irrespective of age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, or the presence of lymphatic vascular invasion (LVI). Within the subgroup receiving adjuvant therapy, factors such as pathological GS≥8 (p<0.0001), pathological tumor stage (pT stage) beyond T3 (p<0.0001), presence of perineural invasion (PNI) (p<0.0001), utilization of a robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP) surgical approach (p<0.0001), and involvement of apical or multifocal PSM sites (p=0.0042 and 0.0054) were identified as significantly associated with the observed protective effect of adjuvant therapy.

Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of identifying apical PSMs, as their presence is associated with an elevated risk of BCR. Administering timely adjuvant therapy to patients with apical PSMs emerges as a potential strategy to improve outcomes. Nevertheless, further research is warranted to refine clinical decision-making and treatment approaches in light of these findings.

评价辅助治疗对前列腺癌根治性切缘阳性患者生化复发的疗效。
背景:本研究探讨根治性前列腺切除术(RP)患者手术切缘阳性(psm)与生化复发(BCR)的关系。方法:对2011年至2020年间111例RP患者进行综合分析。收集临床病理和实验室数据,评估Gleason评分(GS)和不同PSM部位对RP术后无bcr生存的影响。采用各种统计分析,包括卡方检验、学生t检验、Cox回归模型和治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)模型,来检验这些因素对患者预后的影响。结果:IPTW模型显示,接受辅助治疗的患者发生BCR的风险一致降低,与年龄、活检前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平或淋巴血管浸润(LVI)的存在无关。在接受辅助治疗的亚组中,病理GS≥8 (p)等因素强调了识别根尖psm的重要性,因为它们的存在与BCR的风险升高有关。对根尖psm患者进行及时的辅助治疗是改善预后的潜在策略。然而,根据这些发现,需要进一步的研究来完善临床决策和治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信