Effect of Haplo-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Timing on Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia Without Histocompatible Matched Sibling Donor.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Journal of Blood Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JBM.S520719
Dan Fan, Fang Xiao, Jiayi Zhao, Xue Qian Yan, Qiang Liu, Li Liu, Wen Qing Wang, Wei Wei Qin
{"title":"Effect of Haplo-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Timing on Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia Without Histocompatible Matched Sibling Donor.","authors":"Dan Fan, Fang Xiao, Jiayi Zhao, Xue Qian Yan, Qiang Liu, Li Liu, Wen Qing Wang, Wei Wei Qin","doi":"10.2147/JBM.S520719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comparative studies on frontline haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) versus salvage haplo-HSCT after immunosuppressive therapy (IST) failure in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) are limited. To evaluate the effects of different transplantation timing on patient survival, the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and the risk of infection on the outcomes of patients with SAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 82 SAA patients who underwent haplo-HSCT using the \"Beijing protocol\". Patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT within 3 months after diagnosis were in the first-line HSCT group, and patients who were treated with initial IST and followed with allogeneic HSCT after treatment failure or relapse were in the salvage HSCT group. Patients were categorized into the frontline HSCT group (n=40, 48.8%) and the salvage HSCT group (n=42, 51.2%) based on transplantation timing. All 82 patients received grafts from related haploidentical donors. Follow-up was until January 1, 2024, and all patients were followed for more than 12 months with a median follow-up of 49 (12-126) months, except for dead cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis identified salvage HSCT (HR: 5.344, 95% CI: 1.904-14.995), ferritin levels >1000 (HR: 5.588, 95% CI: 1.696-18.414), and CMV infection (HR: 11.909, 95% CI: 2.335-60.725) as independent risk factors for graft failure. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in the front HSCT group (90%, 36/40) compared to the salvage HSCT group (71.4%, 30/42) with mortality rates of 10.0% (4/40) and 28.6% (12/42), respectively (p=0.029). The expected 5-year OS was significantly higher in the frontline HSCT group compared to the salvage group. Salvage HSCT, ECOG score ≥1, and ferritin levels >1000 were identified as independent risk factors for prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frontline haplo-HSCT demonstrates superior survival and safety compared to salvage haplo-HSCT in young SAA patients without a matched sibling donor, warranting further clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":15166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"293-306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S520719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comparative studies on frontline haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) versus salvage haplo-HSCT after immunosuppressive therapy (IST) failure in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) are limited. To evaluate the effects of different transplantation timing on patient survival, the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and the risk of infection on the outcomes of patients with SAA.

Methods: This retrospective study included 82 SAA patients who underwent haplo-HSCT using the "Beijing protocol". Patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT within 3 months after diagnosis were in the first-line HSCT group, and patients who were treated with initial IST and followed with allogeneic HSCT after treatment failure or relapse were in the salvage HSCT group. Patients were categorized into the frontline HSCT group (n=40, 48.8%) and the salvage HSCT group (n=42, 51.2%) based on transplantation timing. All 82 patients received grafts from related haploidentical donors. Follow-up was until January 1, 2024, and all patients were followed for more than 12 months with a median follow-up of 49 (12-126) months, except for dead cases.

Results: Multivariate analysis identified salvage HSCT (HR: 5.344, 95% CI: 1.904-14.995), ferritin levels >1000 (HR: 5.588, 95% CI: 1.696-18.414), and CMV infection (HR: 11.909, 95% CI: 2.335-60.725) as independent risk factors for graft failure. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in the front HSCT group (90%, 36/40) compared to the salvage HSCT group (71.4%, 30/42) with mortality rates of 10.0% (4/40) and 28.6% (12/42), respectively (p=0.029). The expected 5-year OS was significantly higher in the frontline HSCT group compared to the salvage group. Salvage HSCT, ECOG score ≥1, and ferritin levels >1000 were identified as independent risk factors for prognosis.

Conclusion: Frontline haplo-HSCT demonstrates superior survival and safety compared to salvage haplo-HSCT in young SAA patients without a matched sibling donor, warranting further clinical adoption.

单倍异体造血干细胞移植时机对无组织相容性匹配兄弟姐妹供体的严重再生障碍性贫血患者的影响。
背景:在严重再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者免疫抑制治疗(IST)失败后,一线单倍体HSCT (haploi -HSCT)与补救性单倍体HSCT的比较研究有限。评估不同移植时间对患者生存、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率和感染风险对SAA患者预后的影响。方法:回顾性研究82例SAA患者,采用“北京方案”行单倍hsct。诊断后3个月内接受同种异体移植的患者为一线HSCT组,初始接受IST治疗,治疗失败或复发后接受同种异体移植的患者为补救性HSCT组。根据移植时间将患者分为一线HSCT组(n=40, 48.8%)和补救性HSCT组(n=42, 51.2%)。所有82例患者都接受了来自相关单倍体相同供体的移植。随访至2024年1月1日,除死亡病例外,所有患者均随访12个月以上,中位随访49(12-126)个月。结果:多因素分析发现补救性造血干细胞移植(HR: 5.344, 95% CI: 1.904-14.995)、铁蛋白水平bbb1000 (HR: 5.588, 95% CI: 1.696-18.414)和巨细胞病毒感染(HR: 11.909, 95% CI: 2.335-60.725)是移植物失败的独立危险因素。前路HSCT组总生存率(90%,36/40)显著高于补救性HSCT组(71.4%,30/42),死亡率分别为10.0%(4/40)和28.6% (12/42)(p=0.029)。一线HSCT组的预期5年OS明显高于救助组。补救性HSCT、ECOG评分≥1、铁蛋白水平为预后的独立危险因素。结论:在没有匹配的兄弟姐妹供体的年轻SAA患者中,一线单倍hsct与补救性单倍hsct相比具有更高的生存率和安全性,值得进一步的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Blood Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing laboratory, experimental and clinical aspects of all topics pertaining to blood based medicine including but not limited to: Transfusion Medicine (blood components, stem cell transplantation, apheresis, gene based therapeutics), Blood collection, Donor issues, Transmittable diseases, and Blood banking logistics, Immunohematology, Artificial and alternative blood based therapeutics, Hematology including disorders/pathology related to leukocytes/immunology, red cells, platelets and hemostasis, Biotechnology/nanotechnology of blood related medicine, Legal aspects of blood medicine, Historical perspectives. Original research, short reports, reviews, case reports and commentaries are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信