David Wirth, Oliver Senn, Jakob M Burgstaller, Sima Djalali, Leander Muheim, Adrian Rohrbasser, Joel Lehmann, Stefan Markun
{"title":"Acceptability of Components for a Mandatory Quality Improvement Framework: A Survey Among Swiss General Practitioners.","authors":"David Wirth, Oliver Senn, Jakob M Burgstaller, Sima Djalali, Leander Muheim, Adrian Rohrbasser, Joel Lehmann, Stefan Markun","doi":"10.1177/11786329251346828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Switzerland, recently introduced legislation requires the implementation of a framework for mandatory quality improvement at the level of individual general practitioners (GPs) and includes the introduction of quality indicators (QIs) amongst other components. The GP-sided acceptance of potential components of such a framework is important to its success.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify components of a potential framework for mandatory quality improvement that are most likely to be accepted by Swiss GPs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional web-based survey conducted among employed and self-employed Swiss GPs in 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was distributed to 1103 Swiss GPs via their physician networks. The survey inquired the acceptability of 62 possible components of a mandatory framework for quality improvement. Components were categorized as \"acceptable\" if they were rated as \"acceptable\" or \"very acceptable\" by more than 50% of participants, in contrast to those rated as \"neutral\" or \"not acceptable.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244 GPs participated (participation rate 22.1%, 53.0% male, 51.2% <50 years old, 50.8% employed). The majority of participants rated 31 of the proposed 62 components as acceptable. Among these were QIs pertaining to structures and processes of care (rated as acceptable by 58.3%-83.4%) and sharing QI achievement data with peers from different group practices and physician networks (53.9%-92.2%). A majority of participants accepted physician networks, medical associations, and academic institutions as entities that could establish QIs and manage QI data (acceptance 62.1%-88.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Swiss GPs appear to accept QIs that reflect structures and processes of care established by physician networks, medical associations or academic institutions, exclusively shared among their peers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251346828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251346828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In Switzerland, recently introduced legislation requires the implementation of a framework for mandatory quality improvement at the level of individual general practitioners (GPs) and includes the introduction of quality indicators (QIs) amongst other components. The GP-sided acceptance of potential components of such a framework is important to its success.
Objectives: To identify components of a potential framework for mandatory quality improvement that are most likely to be accepted by Swiss GPs.
Design: Cross-sectional web-based survey conducted among employed and self-employed Swiss GPs in 2024.
Methods: The survey was distributed to 1103 Swiss GPs via their physician networks. The survey inquired the acceptability of 62 possible components of a mandatory framework for quality improvement. Components were categorized as "acceptable" if they were rated as "acceptable" or "very acceptable" by more than 50% of participants, in contrast to those rated as "neutral" or "not acceptable."
Results: A total of 244 GPs participated (participation rate 22.1%, 53.0% male, 51.2% <50 years old, 50.8% employed). The majority of participants rated 31 of the proposed 62 components as acceptable. Among these were QIs pertaining to structures and processes of care (rated as acceptable by 58.3%-83.4%) and sharing QI achievement data with peers from different group practices and physician networks (53.9%-92.2%). A majority of participants accepted physician networks, medical associations, and academic institutions as entities that could establish QIs and manage QI data (acceptance 62.1%-88.8%).
Conclusions: Swiss GPs appear to accept QIs that reflect structures and processes of care established by physician networks, medical associations or academic institutions, exclusively shared among their peers.