Remdesivir and risk of multi-systemic long-term sequelae following COVID-19 hospitalisation.

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Liang En Wee, Jue Tao Lim, An Ting Tay, Calvin J Chiew, Barnaby Edward Young, Shawn Vasoo, Huei Xin Lou, David Chien Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan
{"title":"Remdesivir and risk of multi-systemic long-term sequelae following COVID-19 hospitalisation.","authors":"Liang En Wee, Jue Tao Lim, An Ting Tay, Calvin J Chiew, Barnaby Edward Young, Shawn Vasoo, Huei Xin Lou, David Chien Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.06.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Significant heterogeneity has been reported in cohort studies evaluating the impact of antiviral treatment on long-term sequelae following COVID-19 hospitalisation. We evaluated the impact of intravenous (IV) remdesivir on risk of subsequent long-term cardiovascular/neurological/respiratory/autoimmune diagnoses and persistent symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National COVID-19 registries and healthcare claims databases were utilised to construct a retrospective population-based cohort enrolling all adult Singaporeans hospitalised for COVID-19 (1<sup>st</sup> Sept 2021-31<sup>st</sup> Jul 2023), who fulfilled criteria for IV remdesivir. The cohort was divided into remdesivir-treated and untreated groups, with between-group differences in baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics adjusted using overlap-weighting. Risks of long-term new-incident (31-300 days) diagnoses/symptoms across cardiovascular/neurological/respiratory/autoimmune systems were compared across untreated/treated groups via competing-risks-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30,175 COVID-19 hospitalisations were included in the cohort for evaluating risk of long-term sequelae; 37.6% (11,353/30,175) received remdesivir. 88.9% of the cohort were fully-vaccinated, and 60.5% had received a booster dose; 77.4% were infected during Omicron. Risk of long-term new-onset diagnoses across cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory and autoimmune systems (any long-term diagnosis, adjusted-hazards-ratio, aHR=1.08[95%CI=0.97-1.20]) up to 300 days post-COVID-19-hospitalisation was not significantly different in the remdesivir-treated group, versus untreated individuals, across age and vaccination subgroups. Similarly, no significant difference in the incidence of long-term symptom persistence at 300 days post-COVID-19-hospitalisation was observed in the remdesivir-treated group, versus untreated individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Receipt of remdesivir did not significantly reduce risk of long-term multi-systemic sequelae or long-term symptoms in a boosted cohort of adult Singaporeans hospitalised with COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.06.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Significant heterogeneity has been reported in cohort studies evaluating the impact of antiviral treatment on long-term sequelae following COVID-19 hospitalisation. We evaluated the impact of intravenous (IV) remdesivir on risk of subsequent long-term cardiovascular/neurological/respiratory/autoimmune diagnoses and persistent symptoms.

Methods: National COVID-19 registries and healthcare claims databases were utilised to construct a retrospective population-based cohort enrolling all adult Singaporeans hospitalised for COVID-19 (1st Sept 2021-31st Jul 2023), who fulfilled criteria for IV remdesivir. The cohort was divided into remdesivir-treated and untreated groups, with between-group differences in baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics adjusted using overlap-weighting. Risks of long-term new-incident (31-300 days) diagnoses/symptoms across cardiovascular/neurological/respiratory/autoimmune systems were compared across untreated/treated groups via competing-risks-regression.

Results: 30,175 COVID-19 hospitalisations were included in the cohort for evaluating risk of long-term sequelae; 37.6% (11,353/30,175) received remdesivir. 88.9% of the cohort were fully-vaccinated, and 60.5% had received a booster dose; 77.4% were infected during Omicron. Risk of long-term new-onset diagnoses across cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory and autoimmune systems (any long-term diagnosis, adjusted-hazards-ratio, aHR=1.08[95%CI=0.97-1.20]) up to 300 days post-COVID-19-hospitalisation was not significantly different in the remdesivir-treated group, versus untreated individuals, across age and vaccination subgroups. Similarly, no significant difference in the incidence of long-term symptom persistence at 300 days post-COVID-19-hospitalisation was observed in the remdesivir-treated group, versus untreated individuals.

Conclusion: Receipt of remdesivir did not significantly reduce risk of long-term multi-systemic sequelae or long-term symptoms in a boosted cohort of adult Singaporeans hospitalised with COVID-19.

瑞德西韦与COVID-19住院后多系统长期后遗症的风险
目的:在评估抗病毒治疗对COVID-19住院后长期后遗症影响的队列研究中报道了显著的异质性。我们评估了静脉注射(IV)瑞德西韦对随后长期心血管/神经/呼吸/自身免疫诊断和持续症状的风险的影响。方法:利用国家COVID-19登记处和医疗索赔数据库构建基于人群的回顾性队列,纳入所有因COVID-19住院的成年新加坡患者(2021年9月1日至2023年7月31日),这些患者符合静脉注射瑞德西韦的标准。该队列被分为瑞德西韦治疗组和未治疗组,使用重叠加权调整基线社会人口学和临床特征的组间差异。通过竞争风险回归比较未治疗/治疗组心血管/神经/呼吸/自身免疫系统长期新发(31-300天)诊断/症状的风险。结果:30,175例COVID-19住院患者被纳入评估长期后遗症风险的队列;37.6%(11,353/30,175)接受了瑞德西韦治疗。88.9%的人接种了完全疫苗,60.5%的人接种了加强剂;77.4%的人感染了欧米克隆。瑞德西韦治疗组与未治疗组在不同年龄和疫苗接种亚组中,在covid -19住院后300天内心血管、神经、呼吸和自身免疫系统长期新发诊断的风险(任何长期诊断,校正风险比,aHR=1.08[95%CI=0.97-1.20])与未治疗组相比,无显著差异。同样,瑞德西韦治疗组与未治疗组在covid -19住院后300天的长期症状持续发生率方面没有观察到显着差异。结论:在因COVID-19住院的新加坡成年患者中,接受瑞德西韦治疗并没有显著降低长期多系统后遗症或长期症状的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信