Liang En Wee, Jue Tao Lim, An Ting Tay, Calvin J Chiew, Barnaby Edward Young, Shawn Vasoo, Huei Xin Lou, David Chien Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan
{"title":"Remdesivir and risk of multi-systemic long-term sequelae following COVID-19 hospitalisation.","authors":"Liang En Wee, Jue Tao Lim, An Ting Tay, Calvin J Chiew, Barnaby Edward Young, Shawn Vasoo, Huei Xin Lou, David Chien Lye, Kelvin Bryan Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.06.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Significant heterogeneity has been reported in cohort studies evaluating the impact of antiviral treatment on long-term sequelae following COVID-19 hospitalisation. We evaluated the impact of intravenous (IV) remdesivir on risk of subsequent long-term cardiovascular/neurological/respiratory/autoimmune diagnoses and persistent symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National COVID-19 registries and healthcare claims databases were utilised to construct a retrospective population-based cohort enrolling all adult Singaporeans hospitalised for COVID-19 (1<sup>st</sup> Sept 2021-31<sup>st</sup> Jul 2023), who fulfilled criteria for IV remdesivir. The cohort was divided into remdesivir-treated and untreated groups, with between-group differences in baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics adjusted using overlap-weighting. Risks of long-term new-incident (31-300 days) diagnoses/symptoms across cardiovascular/neurological/respiratory/autoimmune systems were compared across untreated/treated groups via competing-risks-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30,175 COVID-19 hospitalisations were included in the cohort for evaluating risk of long-term sequelae; 37.6% (11,353/30,175) received remdesivir. 88.9% of the cohort were fully-vaccinated, and 60.5% had received a booster dose; 77.4% were infected during Omicron. Risk of long-term new-onset diagnoses across cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory and autoimmune systems (any long-term diagnosis, adjusted-hazards-ratio, aHR=1.08[95%CI=0.97-1.20]) up to 300 days post-COVID-19-hospitalisation was not significantly different in the remdesivir-treated group, versus untreated individuals, across age and vaccination subgroups. Similarly, no significant difference in the incidence of long-term symptom persistence at 300 days post-COVID-19-hospitalisation was observed in the remdesivir-treated group, versus untreated individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Receipt of remdesivir did not significantly reduce risk of long-term multi-systemic sequelae or long-term symptoms in a boosted cohort of adult Singaporeans hospitalised with COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.06.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Significant heterogeneity has been reported in cohort studies evaluating the impact of antiviral treatment on long-term sequelae following COVID-19 hospitalisation. We evaluated the impact of intravenous (IV) remdesivir on risk of subsequent long-term cardiovascular/neurological/respiratory/autoimmune diagnoses and persistent symptoms.
Methods: National COVID-19 registries and healthcare claims databases were utilised to construct a retrospective population-based cohort enrolling all adult Singaporeans hospitalised for COVID-19 (1st Sept 2021-31st Jul 2023), who fulfilled criteria for IV remdesivir. The cohort was divided into remdesivir-treated and untreated groups, with between-group differences in baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics adjusted using overlap-weighting. Risks of long-term new-incident (31-300 days) diagnoses/symptoms across cardiovascular/neurological/respiratory/autoimmune systems were compared across untreated/treated groups via competing-risks-regression.
Results: 30,175 COVID-19 hospitalisations were included in the cohort for evaluating risk of long-term sequelae; 37.6% (11,353/30,175) received remdesivir. 88.9% of the cohort were fully-vaccinated, and 60.5% had received a booster dose; 77.4% were infected during Omicron. Risk of long-term new-onset diagnoses across cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory and autoimmune systems (any long-term diagnosis, adjusted-hazards-ratio, aHR=1.08[95%CI=0.97-1.20]) up to 300 days post-COVID-19-hospitalisation was not significantly different in the remdesivir-treated group, versus untreated individuals, across age and vaccination subgroups. Similarly, no significant difference in the incidence of long-term symptom persistence at 300 days post-COVID-19-hospitalisation was observed in the remdesivir-treated group, versus untreated individuals.
Conclusion: Receipt of remdesivir did not significantly reduce risk of long-term multi-systemic sequelae or long-term symptoms in a boosted cohort of adult Singaporeans hospitalised with COVID-19.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.