Kristof Sebastian Hansson Horvath, Nils Roar Gjerdet, Xie-Qi Shi
{"title":"Advancements in Caries Diagnostics Using Bitewing Radiography: A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches.","authors":"Kristof Sebastian Hansson Horvath, Nils Roar Gjerdet, Xie-Qi Shi","doi":"10.1159/000546448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Deep learning techniques have emerged as promising tools for enhancing the radiographic diagnosis of caries, particularly when utilizing bitewing radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted to assess the use of deep learning for caries diagnosis in bitewing radiographs. Literature searches were performed across Web of Science and PubMed databases for studies published before March 2025 that utilized deep learning for caries detection, segmentation, and classification using bitewing radiographs. Data extraction focused on model architectures, dataset characteristics, annotation processes, diagnostic performance metrics, and potential biases, as assessed by the QUADAS-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing caries detection, segmentation, and severity classification. The most frequently applied deep learning models were classification models, such as ResNet and detection models, such as YOLO architectures. Dataset sizes varied widely, ranging from 112 to 8,539 images. Most studies reported high diagnostic performance, with accuracies ranging from 70% to 99%. Some AI models outperformed or matched the performance of human experts, particularly in detecting advanced carious lesions. However, considerable variability was observed in model architectures, dataset characteristics, the applied diagnostic performance metrics, and reporting standards. The risk of bias assessment revealed concerns in patient selection, index test interpretation, and reference standards, with all studies rated as having a high risk of bias in at least one domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review identified challenges in currently developed deep learning models regarding methodological heterogeneity, lack of standardization, limited dataset diversity, insufficient clinical validation, and concerns about bias and data transparency. Nevertheless, all studies concluded that deep learning models are promising as an assistive diagnostic tool in caries diagnostics using bitewing radiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Deep learning techniques have emerged as promising tools for enhancing the radiographic diagnosis of caries, particularly when utilizing bitewing radiographs.
Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted to assess the use of deep learning for caries diagnosis in bitewing radiographs. Literature searches were performed across Web of Science and PubMed databases for studies published before March 2025 that utilized deep learning for caries detection, segmentation, and classification using bitewing radiographs. Data extraction focused on model architectures, dataset characteristics, annotation processes, diagnostic performance metrics, and potential biases, as assessed by the QUADAS-2.
Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing caries detection, segmentation, and severity classification. The most frequently applied deep learning models were classification models, such as ResNet and detection models, such as YOLO architectures. Dataset sizes varied widely, ranging from 112 to 8,539 images. Most studies reported high diagnostic performance, with accuracies ranging from 70% to 99%. Some AI models outperformed or matched the performance of human experts, particularly in detecting advanced carious lesions. However, considerable variability was observed in model architectures, dataset characteristics, the applied diagnostic performance metrics, and reporting standards. The risk of bias assessment revealed concerns in patient selection, index test interpretation, and reference standards, with all studies rated as having a high risk of bias in at least one domain.
Conclusion: The review identified challenges in currently developed deep learning models regarding methodological heterogeneity, lack of standardization, limited dataset diversity, insufficient clinical validation, and concerns about bias and data transparency. Nevertheless, all studies concluded that deep learning models are promising as an assistive diagnostic tool in caries diagnostics using bitewing radiography.
深度学习技术已经成为增强龋齿放射诊断的有前途的工具,特别是在使用咬翼x线片时。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,系统评价深度学习在咬翼x线片龋病诊断中的应用。研究人员在Web of Science和PubMed数据库中检索了2025年3月之前发表的利用深度学习技术进行龋齿检测、分割和分类的研究。根据QUADAS-2的评估,数据提取主要集中在模型架构、数据集特征、注释过程、诊断性能指标和潜在偏差上。结果:23项研究符合纳入标准,包括龋齿检测、分割和严重程度分类。最常用的深度学习模型是分类模型,如ResNet和检测模型,如YOLO架构。数据集大小变化很大,从112到8539张图像不等。大多数研究报告了较高的诊断效能,准确率在70%到99%之间。一些人工智能模型的表现超过或匹配人类专家的表现,特别是在检测晚期龋齿病变方面。然而,在模型架构、数据集特征、应用诊断性能指标和报告标准方面观察到相当大的差异。偏倚风险评估揭示了对患者选择、指标试验解释和参考标准的关注,所有研究至少在一个领域被评为具有高偏倚风险。结论:本综述确定了当前开发的深度学习模型面临的挑战,包括方法异质性、缺乏标准化、数据集多样性有限、临床验证不足以及对偏倚和数据透明度的担忧。尽管如此,所有的研究都得出结论,深度学习模型很有希望作为一种辅助诊断工具,用于使用咬翼放射学进行龋齿诊断。
期刊介绍:
''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.