Comparing R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and RPN Scores: Is RPN the More Logical Choice in the Robotic Era?

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Peitong Li, Nathan Papa, Niall M Corcoran, Dinesh K Agarwal
{"title":"Comparing R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and RPN Scores: Is RPN the More Logical Choice in the Robotic Era?","authors":"Peitong Li, Nathan Papa, Niall M Corcoran, Dinesh K Agarwal","doi":"10.1111/bju.16807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Since their introduction in 2009, first-generation nephrometry systems, the Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness to collecting system or sinus, Anterior/posterior, Location (R.E.N.A.L.) and Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical Classification (PADUA), have dominated the academic landscape in providing a structured manner to characterise kidney cancers. Their use has extended to predicting perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomies (PN). In 2022, the Radius, Position of the tumour, iNvasion of renal sinus (RPN), a new nephrometry system was introduced to streamline the process of evaluating renal tumours for their surgical difficulty specific to the robot-assisted laparoscopic approach, with clinically relevant validation. This paper critically compares these three nephrometry systems in terms of their aims, methodologies, performance in validation studies and ease of use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key information about the nephrometry systems was extracted into a table. Categories compared include nomenclature, tumour-specific characteristics, use of suffixes, methodological differences, validation, and ease of use.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The comparison of the R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and RPN nephrometry systems highlights distinct differences in their methodologies and objectives. While the R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA systems focus on aiding decision-making and data reporting for PN, neither system is specific to the robot-assisted approach. In contrast, the RPN system is specifically tailored for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), aiming to assess preoperative surgical difficulty and ensure consistency in reporting data for RAPN series. Further validation is needed to elucidate the RPN system's utility in modern RAPN practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the current era of RAPN, surgeons require a simple and easy to use nephrometry system to evaluate a renal tumour's surgical complexity quickly and accurately. RPN demonstrates promise in fulfilling this role.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Since their introduction in 2009, first-generation nephrometry systems, the Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness to collecting system or sinus, Anterior/posterior, Location (R.E.N.A.L.) and Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical Classification (PADUA), have dominated the academic landscape in providing a structured manner to characterise kidney cancers. Their use has extended to predicting perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomies (PN). In 2022, the Radius, Position of the tumour, iNvasion of renal sinus (RPN), a new nephrometry system was introduced to streamline the process of evaluating renal tumours for their surgical difficulty specific to the robot-assisted laparoscopic approach, with clinically relevant validation. This paper critically compares these three nephrometry systems in terms of their aims, methodologies, performance in validation studies and ease of use.

Methods: Key information about the nephrometry systems was extracted into a table. Categories compared include nomenclature, tumour-specific characteristics, use of suffixes, methodological differences, validation, and ease of use.

Key findings and limitations: The comparison of the R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and RPN nephrometry systems highlights distinct differences in their methodologies and objectives. While the R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA systems focus on aiding decision-making and data reporting for PN, neither system is specific to the robot-assisted approach. In contrast, the RPN system is specifically tailored for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), aiming to assess preoperative surgical difficulty and ensure consistency in reporting data for RAPN series. Further validation is needed to elucidate the RPN system's utility in modern RAPN practice.

Conclusion: In the current era of RAPN, surgeons require a simple and easy to use nephrometry system to evaluate a renal tumour's surgical complexity quickly and accurately. RPN demonstrates promise in fulfilling this role.

比较R.E.N.A.L, PADUA和RPN分数:RPN是机器人时代更合理的选择吗?
背景和目的:自2009年推出以来,第一代肾脏测量系统,即半径、外生/内生、靠近收集系统或窦、前/后、定位(R.E.N.A.L.)和用于解剖分类的术前方面和尺寸(PADUA),在提供结构化方式来描述肾癌的学术领域占据主导地位。它们的应用已经扩展到预测部分肾切除术(PN)的围手术期预后。2022年,一种新的肾脏测量系统“半径、肿瘤位置、肾窦侵入”(RPN)被引入,以简化机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾肿瘤手术难度的评估过程,并获得临床相关验证。本文比较了这三种肾测量系统在他们的目的,方法,性能验证研究和易用性方面。方法:将肾测量系统的关键信息提取成表格。比较的类别包括命名法、肿瘤特异性特征、后缀的使用、方法差异、有效性和易用性。主要发现和局限性:R.E.N.A.L、PADUA和RPN肾脏测量系统的比较突出了它们在方法和目标上的明显差异。虽然R.E.N.A.L.和PADUA系统专注于帮助PN的决策和数据报告,但这两个系统都不是专门针对机器人辅助方法的。相比之下,RPN系统是专门为机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)量身定制的,旨在评估术前手术难度,并确保RAPN系列报告数据的一致性。需要进一步的验证来阐明RPN系统在现代RAPN实践中的实用性。结论:在RAPN时代,外科医生需要一个简单易用的肾脏测量系统来快速准确地评估肾脏肿瘤的手术复杂性。RPN展示了履行这一角色的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信