{"title":"Effects of Allisartan on Uric Acid, Left Atrial, Left Ventricular, and Artery Stiffness in Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension","authors":"Yancui Sun, Hanqiong Wu, Ying Zhang, Yan Liu, Minghui Gong, Wei Song, Yinong Jiang","doi":"10.1111/jch.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to explore the effects of allisartan in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. This is a randomized, double-blind, crossover design involving 98 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Participants were randomized and divided into two groups: Group A (baseline—olmesartan—allisartan) and Group B (baseline—allisartan—olmesartan). Each treatment phase included 12 weeks, and participants were administered allisartan (240 mg) or olmesartan (20 mg) once daily. After treatment, both allisartan and olmesartan led to a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels from baseline (Δ = 6.50 mmHg, <i>p </i>< 0.001 and Δ = 5.64 mmHg, <i>p </i>= 0.002, respectively), with no significant difference between the two drugs. Notably, allisartan led to a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels from baseline (Δ = 3.39 mmHg, <i>p </i>= 0.016), while olmesartan did not (Δ = 2.09 mmHg, <i>p </i>= 0.126), allisartan exhibited a more pronounced reduction in DBP compared to olmesartan (Δ = 3.66 mmHg, <i>p </i>= 0.001). Allisartan significantly dropped serum UA levels (Δ = 26.37 µmol/L, <i>p </i>< 0.001), whereas olmesartan did not achieve a significant reduction compared to allisartan (Δ = −7.26 µmol/L, <i>p </i>= 0.991). In terms of cardiac and artery stiffness, allisartan demonstrated significant reductions in left atrial volume index (LAVI; Δ = 2.86 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p </i>< 0.001), left ventricular mass index (Δ = 4.82 g/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p </i>= 0.010) and ankle-brachial pulse wave velocity (baPWV) (Δ = 154.49 cm/s, <i>p </i>< 0.001), all-surpassing olmesartan significantly (all <i>p </i>< 0.01). In Conclusion, allisartan 240 mg and olmesartan 20 mg once daily achieve broadly similar reductions in blood pressure, improving left heart structure and function, mitigating arterial stiffness in individuals with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Compared to olmesartan, allisartan demonstrates significant reductions in serum UA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the effects of allisartan in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. This is a randomized, double-blind, crossover design involving 98 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Participants were randomized and divided into two groups: Group A (baseline—olmesartan—allisartan) and Group B (baseline—allisartan—olmesartan). Each treatment phase included 12 weeks, and participants were administered allisartan (240 mg) or olmesartan (20 mg) once daily. After treatment, both allisartan and olmesartan led to a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels from baseline (Δ = 6.50 mmHg, p < 0.001 and Δ = 5.64 mmHg, p = 0.002, respectively), with no significant difference between the two drugs. Notably, allisartan led to a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels from baseline (Δ = 3.39 mmHg, p = 0.016), while olmesartan did not (Δ = 2.09 mmHg, p = 0.126), allisartan exhibited a more pronounced reduction in DBP compared to olmesartan (Δ = 3.66 mmHg, p = 0.001). Allisartan significantly dropped serum UA levels (Δ = 26.37 µmol/L, p < 0.001), whereas olmesartan did not achieve a significant reduction compared to allisartan (Δ = −7.26 µmol/L, p = 0.991). In terms of cardiac and artery stiffness, allisartan demonstrated significant reductions in left atrial volume index (LAVI; Δ = 2.86 mL/m2, p < 0.001), left ventricular mass index (Δ = 4.82 g/m2, p = 0.010) and ankle-brachial pulse wave velocity (baPWV) (Δ = 154.49 cm/s, p < 0.001), all-surpassing olmesartan significantly (all p < 0.01). In Conclusion, allisartan 240 mg and olmesartan 20 mg once daily achieve broadly similar reductions in blood pressure, improving left heart structure and function, mitigating arterial stiffness in individuals with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Compared to olmesartan, allisartan demonstrates significant reductions in serum UA.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.