Effects of Allisartan on Uric Acid, Left Atrial, Left Ventricular, and Artery Stiffness in Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Yancui Sun, Hanqiong Wu, Ying Zhang, Yan Liu, Minghui Gong, Wei Song, Yinong Jiang
{"title":"Effects of Allisartan on Uric Acid, Left Atrial, Left Ventricular, and Artery Stiffness in Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension","authors":"Yancui Sun,&nbsp;Hanqiong Wu,&nbsp;Ying Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Liu,&nbsp;Minghui Gong,&nbsp;Wei Song,&nbsp;Yinong Jiang","doi":"10.1111/jch.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to explore the effects of allisartan in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. This is a randomized, double-blind, crossover design involving 98 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Participants were randomized and divided into two groups: Group A (baseline—olmesartan—allisartan) and Group B (baseline—allisartan—olmesartan). Each treatment phase included 12 weeks, and participants were administered allisartan (240 mg) or olmesartan (20 mg) once daily. After treatment, both allisartan and olmesartan led to a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels from baseline (Δ = 6.50 mmHg, <i>p </i>&lt; 0.001 and Δ = 5.64 mmHg, <i>p </i>= 0.002, respectively), with no significant difference between the two drugs. Notably, allisartan led to a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels from baseline (Δ = 3.39 mmHg, <i>p </i>= 0.016), while olmesartan did not (Δ = 2.09 mmHg, <i>p </i>= 0.126), allisartan exhibited a more pronounced reduction in DBP compared to olmesartan (Δ = 3.66 mmHg, <i>p </i>= 0.001). Allisartan significantly dropped serum UA levels (Δ = 26.37 µmol/L, <i>p </i>&lt; 0.001), whereas olmesartan did not achieve a significant reduction compared to allisartan (Δ = −7.26 µmol/L, <i>p </i>= 0.991). In terms of cardiac and artery stiffness, allisartan demonstrated significant reductions in left atrial volume index (LAVI; Δ = 2.86 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p </i>&lt; 0.001), left ventricular mass index (Δ = 4.82 g/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p </i>= 0.010) and ankle-brachial pulse wave velocity (baPWV) (Δ = 154.49 cm/s, <i>p </i>&lt; 0.001), all-surpassing olmesartan significantly (all <i>p </i>&lt; 0.01). In Conclusion, allisartan 240 mg and olmesartan 20 mg once daily achieve broadly similar reductions in blood pressure, improving left heart structure and function, mitigating arterial stiffness in individuals with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Compared to olmesartan, allisartan demonstrates significant reductions in serum UA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of allisartan in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. This is a randomized, double-blind, crossover design involving 98 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Participants were randomized and divided into two groups: Group A (baseline—olmesartan—allisartan) and Group B (baseline—allisartan—olmesartan). Each treatment phase included 12 weeks, and participants were administered allisartan (240 mg) or olmesartan (20 mg) once daily. After treatment, both allisartan and olmesartan led to a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels from baseline (Δ = 6.50 mmHg, < 0.001 and Δ = 5.64 mmHg, = 0.002, respectively), with no significant difference between the two drugs. Notably, allisartan led to a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels from baseline (Δ = 3.39 mmHg, = 0.016), while olmesartan did not (Δ = 2.09 mmHg, = 0.126), allisartan exhibited a more pronounced reduction in DBP compared to olmesartan (Δ = 3.66 mmHg, = 0.001). Allisartan significantly dropped serum UA levels (Δ = 26.37 µmol/L, < 0.001), whereas olmesartan did not achieve a significant reduction compared to allisartan (Δ = −7.26 µmol/L, = 0.991). In terms of cardiac and artery stiffness, allisartan demonstrated significant reductions in left atrial volume index (LAVI; Δ = 2.86 mL/m2, < 0.001), left ventricular mass index (Δ = 4.82 g/m2, = 0.010) and ankle-brachial pulse wave velocity (baPWV) (Δ = 154.49 cm/s, < 0.001), all-surpassing olmesartan significantly (all < 0.01). In Conclusion, allisartan 240 mg and olmesartan 20 mg once daily achieve broadly similar reductions in blood pressure, improving left heart structure and function, mitigating arterial stiffness in individuals with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Compared to olmesartan, allisartan demonstrates significant reductions in serum UA.

Abstract Image

阿利沙坦对轻中度高血压患者尿酸、左心房、左心室和动脉硬度的影响
本研究旨在探讨艾利沙坦对轻中度原发性高血压的影响。这是一项随机、双盲、交叉设计,涉及98例轻中度原发性高血压患者。参与者随机分为两组:A组(基线-奥美沙坦-艾利沙坦)和B组(基线-艾利沙坦-奥美沙坦)。每个治疗阶段包括12周,参与者每天服用一次阿利沙坦(240毫克)或奥美沙坦(20毫克)。治疗后,阿利沙坦和奥美沙坦均导致收缩压(SBP)水平较基线显著降低(Δ = 6.50 mmHg, p <;0.001和Δ = 5.64 mmHg, p = 0.002),两种药物间无显著差异。值得注意的是,艾利沙坦导致舒张压(DBP)水平从基线显著降低(Δ = 3.39 mmHg, p = 0.016),而奥美沙坦没有(Δ = 2.09 mmHg, p = 0.126),与奥美沙坦相比,艾利沙坦表现出更明显的舒张压降低(Δ = 3.66 mmHg, p = 0.001)。阿利沙坦显著降低血清UA水平(Δ = 26.37µmol/L, p <;0.001),而奥美沙坦与艾利沙坦相比没有显著降低(Δ =−7.26µmol/L, p = 0.991)。在心脏和动脉硬度方面,艾利沙坦显示左心房容积指数(LAVI;Δ = 2.86 mL/m2, p <;0.001)、左心室质量指数(Δ = 4.82 g/m2, p = 0.010)、踝臂脉搏波速度(baPWV) (Δ = 154.49 cm/s, p <;0.001),显著优于奥美沙坦(p <;0.01)。综上所述,艾利沙坦240mg和奥美沙坦20mg每日一次在降低血压、改善左心结构和功能、减轻轻度至中度原发性高血压患者动脉僵硬方面的效果大致相似。与奥美沙坦相比,阿利沙坦可显著降低血清UA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信