Review of Current Procedural Variations of the High-Probability Instructional Sequence

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Amalix M. Flores, Catia Cividini-Motta, Holly N. Denette, Luisa T. Angelucci
{"title":"Review of Current Procedural Variations of the High-Probability Instructional Sequence","authors":"Amalix M. Flores,&nbsp;Catia Cividini-Motta,&nbsp;Holly N. Denette,&nbsp;Luisa T. Angelucci","doi":"10.1002/bin.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The high-probability instructional sequence (HPIS) is a widely used behavior analytical intervention comprising multiple components and procedural variations; therefore, identifying the key elements contributing to its efficacy is crucial. Twenty articles published between 2010 and 2022 met our inclusion criteria. We quantified the association between HPIS procedural variations and the intervention's efficacy. Across the studies included in this review, HPIS was associated with a moderately large effect or a large effect and deemed as effective for at least 60% of the data sets when (a) during the compliance assessment, compliance was exposed to appetitive consequences, (b) during the HPIS evaluation, the same combination of stimuli (e.g., edible and praise; tactile stimulus and praise) was delivered contingent on compliance with the high-p and low-p, and (c) during the HPIS evaluation different consequences were provided for compliance with the low-p and high-p and combined stimuli were presented as a reinforcer following compliance to low-p (i.e., praise for compliance with the high-p and praise and tactile stimulus for compliance with the low-p). The associations identified in this review can guide the design and implementation of HPIS in applied settings. Additionally, the results highlight the need for additional empirical evaluations of isolated and combined components of HPIS to determine their relative contribution to the intervention efficacy and to determine the generality of the results of previous studies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.70021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high-probability instructional sequence (HPIS) is a widely used behavior analytical intervention comprising multiple components and procedural variations; therefore, identifying the key elements contributing to its efficacy is crucial. Twenty articles published between 2010 and 2022 met our inclusion criteria. We quantified the association between HPIS procedural variations and the intervention's efficacy. Across the studies included in this review, HPIS was associated with a moderately large effect or a large effect and deemed as effective for at least 60% of the data sets when (a) during the compliance assessment, compliance was exposed to appetitive consequences, (b) during the HPIS evaluation, the same combination of stimuli (e.g., edible and praise; tactile stimulus and praise) was delivered contingent on compliance with the high-p and low-p, and (c) during the HPIS evaluation different consequences were provided for compliance with the low-p and high-p and combined stimuli were presented as a reinforcer following compliance to low-p (i.e., praise for compliance with the high-p and praise and tactile stimulus for compliance with the low-p). The associations identified in this review can guide the design and implementation of HPIS in applied settings. Additionally, the results highlight the need for additional empirical evaluations of isolated and combined components of HPIS to determine their relative contribution to the intervention efficacy and to determine the generality of the results of previous studies.

当前高概率教学序列的程序变化综述
高概率教学序列(high-probability instruction sequence, HPIS)是一种广泛使用的行为分析干预方法,它包含多个组成部分和程序变化。因此,确定影响其功效的关键因素至关重要。2010年至2022年间发表的20篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。我们量化了HPIS程序变化与干预效果之间的关系。在本综述中纳入的所有研究中,HPIS具有中等或较大的效应,并且在以下情况下至少60%的数据集被认为是有效的:(a)在依从性评估期间,依从性暴露于食欲后果,(b)在HPIS评估期间,相同的刺激组合(例如,可食用和赞美;(c)在HPIS评估过程中,对低p和高p的依从性提供了不同的结果,并将组合刺激作为对低p的依从性的强化物(即,对高p的依从性的表扬和对低p的依从性的表扬和触觉刺激)。本综述中确定的关联可以指导hpi在应用环境中的设计和实施。此外,研究结果强调需要对HPIS的分离成分和组合成分进行额外的实证评估,以确定它们对干预效果的相对贡献,并确定先前研究结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信