Resolving Low Cloud Feedbacks Globally With E3SM High-Res MMF: Agreement With LES but Stronger Shortwave Effects

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Liran Peng, Peter N. Blossey, Walter M. Hannah, Christopher S. Bretherton, Christopher R. Terai, Andrea M. Jenney, Savannah L. Ferretti, Hossein Parishani, Michael S. Pritchard
{"title":"Resolving Low Cloud Feedbacks Globally With E3SM High-Res MMF: Agreement With LES but Stronger Shortwave Effects","authors":"Liran Peng,&nbsp;Peter N. Blossey,&nbsp;Walter M. Hannah,&nbsp;Christopher S. Bretherton,&nbsp;Christopher R. Terai,&nbsp;Andrea M. Jenney,&nbsp;Savannah L. Ferretti,&nbsp;Hossein Parishani,&nbsp;Michael S. Pritchard","doi":"10.1029/2025MS005003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates low cloud feedback in a warmer climate using global simulations from the High-Resolution Multi-scale Modeling Framework (HR-MMF), which explicitly simulates small-scale eddies globally. Two 5-year simulations—one with present-day sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and a second with SSTs warmed uniformly by 4 K—reveal a positive global shortwave cloud radiative effect (SWCRE = 0.3 W/<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{m}}^{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>/K), comparable to estimates from CMIP models. As the climate warms, significant reductions in low cloud cover occur over stratocumulus regions. This study is the first attempt to compare HR-MMF results with predictions from idealized large-eddy simulations from the CGILS intercomparison. Despite different underlying assumptions, we find qualitative agreement in SWCRE and inversion height changes between HR-MMF and CGILS predictions. This suggests reasonable credibility for the CGILS framework in predicting cloud responses under the out-of-sample conditions found in HR-MMF. However, the HR-MMF exhibits stronger SWCRE changes than predicted by CGILS. We explore potential causes for this discrepancy, examining variations in cloud-controlling factors (CCFs) and cloud conditions. Our results show a fairly homogeneous SWCRE response, with little systematic variation tied to the variations in CCFs. This reveals a dominant role for SST forcing in modulating SWCRE.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025MS005003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025MS005003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates low cloud feedback in a warmer climate using global simulations from the High-Resolution Multi-scale Modeling Framework (HR-MMF), which explicitly simulates small-scale eddies globally. Two 5-year simulations—one with present-day sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and a second with SSTs warmed uniformly by 4 K—reveal a positive global shortwave cloud radiative effect (SWCRE = 0.3 W/ m 2 ${\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ /K), comparable to estimates from CMIP models. As the climate warms, significant reductions in low cloud cover occur over stratocumulus regions. This study is the first attempt to compare HR-MMF results with predictions from idealized large-eddy simulations from the CGILS intercomparison. Despite different underlying assumptions, we find qualitative agreement in SWCRE and inversion height changes between HR-MMF and CGILS predictions. This suggests reasonable credibility for the CGILS framework in predicting cloud responses under the out-of-sample conditions found in HR-MMF. However, the HR-MMF exhibits stronger SWCRE changes than predicted by CGILS. We explore potential causes for this discrepancy, examining variations in cloud-controlling factors (CCFs) and cloud conditions. Our results show a fairly homogeneous SWCRE response, with little systematic variation tied to the variations in CCFs. This reveals a dominant role for SST forcing in modulating SWCRE.

用E3SM高分辨率MMF解析全球低云反馈:与LES一致,但短波效应更强
本研究利用高分辨率多尺度建模框架(HR-MMF)的全球模拟研究了变暖气候下的低云反馈,该框架明确模拟了全球范围内的小规模涡旋。两个5年模拟——一个是用当前海表温度(sst)模拟,另一个是用平均升温4 K的海表温度模拟——揭示了一个正的全球短波云辐射效应(SWCRE = 0.3 W/ m 2 ${\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ /K),与CMIP模式的估计相当。随着气候变暖,层积云区域的低云量显著减少。这项研究首次尝试将HR-MMF结果与cils相互比较的理想大涡模拟预测结果进行比较。尽管基本假设不同,但我们发现HR-MMF和cils预测在SWCRE和反演高度变化方面的定性一致。这表明cils框架在预测HR-MMF中发现的样本外条件下的云响应方面具有合理的可信度。然而,HR-MMF表现出比cils预测更强的SWCRE变化。我们探讨了这种差异的潜在原因,检查了云控制因素(CCFs)和云条件的变化。我们的研究结果显示,SWCRE的反应相当均匀,与CCFs的变化相关的系统变化很少。这揭示了海温强迫在调制SWCRE中的主导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信