Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Profunda Femoris Artery Perforator Flap

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1002/micr.70085
Chika Gon, Ryo Karakawa, Hidehiko Yoshimatsu, Yuma Fuse, Rei Ogawa, Tomoyuki Yano
{"title":"Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Profunda Femoris Artery Perforator Flap","authors":"Chika Gon,&nbsp;Ryo Karakawa,&nbsp;Hidehiko Yoshimatsu,&nbsp;Yuma Fuse,&nbsp;Rei Ogawa,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Yano","doi":"10.1002/micr.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>While autologous breast reconstruction using the profunda femoris artery perforator (PAP) flap is becoming increasingly popular, no aesthetic evaluation has been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reconstructed breast using the PAP flap quantitatively and to clarify which factors contribute to the aesthetically favorable results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 127 patients who underwent breast reconstructions using the vertically designed PAP flap for unilateral breast cancer between April 2018 and December 2021. The PAP flap was elevated vertically to avoid disrupting lymphatic pathways and was inserted between the pectoralis major muscle and the subcutaneous fat after the anastomoses. We classified cases into two groups: the “Favorable cosmesis group” and the “Unfavorable cosmesis group” based on aesthetic evaluations using the vectra three-dimensional (3D) imaging system. Patient characteristics and outcomes between two groups were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 127 patients, 15 were excluded: three with stacked PAP flaps, two with flap necrosis, and 10 with missing aesthetic outcome data. Among the remaining 112 patients, 18 were classified in the “Favorable cosmesis group” and 94 in the “Unfavorable cosmesis group.” Comparative analysis revealed that the “Favorable cosmesis group” showed significantly higher ratio with small volume in the upper pole of the unaffected side (21% vs. 72%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and had a smaller final inset flap weight (147 vs. 190 g, <i>p</i> = 0.028) compared to the “Unfavorable cosmesis group.” All 112 patients were evaluated using vectra 3D system at 12 months postoperatively, and their postoperative flap courses were uneventful.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In our study, inherent small volume of the upper pole and smaller flap inset weight contribute to more favorable outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While autologous breast reconstruction using the profunda femoris artery perforator (PAP) flap is becoming increasingly popular, no aesthetic evaluation has been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reconstructed breast using the PAP flap quantitatively and to clarify which factors contribute to the aesthetically favorable results.

Methods

We identified 127 patients who underwent breast reconstructions using the vertically designed PAP flap for unilateral breast cancer between April 2018 and December 2021. The PAP flap was elevated vertically to avoid disrupting lymphatic pathways and was inserted between the pectoralis major muscle and the subcutaneous fat after the anastomoses. We classified cases into two groups: the “Favorable cosmesis group” and the “Unfavorable cosmesis group” based on aesthetic evaluations using the vectra three-dimensional (3D) imaging system. Patient characteristics and outcomes between two groups were compared.

Results

Of the 127 patients, 15 were excluded: three with stacked PAP flaps, two with flap necrosis, and 10 with missing aesthetic outcome data. Among the remaining 112 patients, 18 were classified in the “Favorable cosmesis group” and 94 in the “Unfavorable cosmesis group.” Comparative analysis revealed that the “Favorable cosmesis group” showed significantly higher ratio with small volume in the upper pole of the unaffected side (21% vs. 72%, p < 0.01) and had a smaller final inset flap weight (147 vs. 190 g, p = 0.028) compared to the “Unfavorable cosmesis group.” All 112 patients were evaluated using vectra 3D system at 12 months postoperatively, and their postoperative flap courses were uneventful.

Conclusions

In our study, inherent small volume of the upper pole and smaller flap inset weight contribute to more favorable outcomes.

股深动脉穿支皮瓣自体乳房再造术的美学效果评价
背景:自体乳房重建使用股深动脉穿支(PAP)皮瓣越来越流行,没有美学评价的报道。本研究的目的是定量评估使用PAP皮瓣重建的乳房,并阐明哪些因素有助于美观的结果。方法:2018年4月至2021年12月,127例单侧乳腺癌患者采用垂直设计的PAP皮瓣进行乳房重建。PAP瓣垂直抬高,避免破坏淋巴管通路,吻合后插入胸大肌与皮下脂肪之间。我们使用vectra三维成像系统,根据审美评价将病例分为“美观组”和“美观组”两组。比较两组患者的特征和结局。结果在127例患者中,15例被排除在外:3例PAP皮瓣堆叠,2例皮瓣坏死,10例美学结果数据缺失。其余112例患者中,“良好美容组”18例,“不良美容组”94例。对比分析显示,“良好美容组”与“不良美容组”相比,未患侧上极体积小的比例显著高于“良好美容组”(21%比72%,p < 0.01),且最终植皮瓣重量更小(147比190 g, p = 0.028)。112例患者术后12个月均采用vectra 3D系统进行评估,术后皮瓣疗程均顺利。结论在本研究中,上极固有的小体积和较小的皮瓣植入重量有助于获得更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信