Steroid-eluting stents in challenging frontal sinus surgery: A critical real world experience

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sven Beckmann , Davina Gut , Raffael Fink , Marco Caversaccio , Urs Borner , Lukas Anschuetz
{"title":"Steroid-eluting stents in challenging frontal sinus surgery: A critical real world experience","authors":"Sven Beckmann ,&nbsp;Davina Gut ,&nbsp;Raffael Fink ,&nbsp;Marco Caversaccio ,&nbsp;Urs Borner ,&nbsp;Lukas Anschuetz","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study investigates the impact of placing steroid-eluting stents in the frontal sinus outflow tract on the need for postoperative interventions and postoperative changes in symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective case-control study between January 2018 and December 2022 in 21 patients in each group with and without a steroid-eluting stent placed in the frontal sinus outflow tract. The outcome between the two groups was investigated regarding the need for revision surgery and changes in pre- and postoperative symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Comparison between the two groups in the postoperative course revealed no statistically significant differences with respect to postoperative interventions. Further analysis of the postoperative symptoms demonstrated statistically significant reduced hyposmia, rhinorrhea, and nasal obstruction in the group with stenting after surgery than before surgery, whereas pain and rhinorrhea were reported significantly less frequently in the group without stenting in the postoperative course.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study revealed no statistically significant differences in the postoperative course between the stenting and no-stenting group regarding early postoperative interventions (local intervention, revision surgery). Accordingly, this study is the first to show no significant difference in the postoperative intervention rates, whereas previous studies have all shown a significant difference in the need for postoperative interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 5","pages":"Article 104685"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070925000882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigates the impact of placing steroid-eluting stents in the frontal sinus outflow tract on the need for postoperative interventions and postoperative changes in symptoms.

Methods

We performed a retrospective case-control study between January 2018 and December 2022 in 21 patients in each group with and without a steroid-eluting stent placed in the frontal sinus outflow tract. The outcome between the two groups was investigated regarding the need for revision surgery and changes in pre- and postoperative symptoms.

Results

Comparison between the two groups in the postoperative course revealed no statistically significant differences with respect to postoperative interventions. Further analysis of the postoperative symptoms demonstrated statistically significant reduced hyposmia, rhinorrhea, and nasal obstruction in the group with stenting after surgery than before surgery, whereas pain and rhinorrhea were reported significantly less frequently in the group without stenting in the postoperative course.

Conclusions

This study revealed no statistically significant differences in the postoperative course between the stenting and no-stenting group regarding early postoperative interventions (local intervention, revision surgery). Accordingly, this study is the first to show no significant difference in the postoperative intervention rates, whereas previous studies have all shown a significant difference in the need for postoperative interventions.
类固醇洗脱支架在具有挑战性的额窦手术:一个关键的现实世界的经验
目的探讨在额窦流出道放置类固醇洗脱支架对术后干预需求和术后症状变化的影响。方法2018年1月至2022年12月,我们对每组21例在额窦流出道放置或不放置类固醇洗脱支架的患者进行回顾性病例对照研究。两组之间的结果被调查关于翻修手术的需要和术前和术后症状的变化。结果两组在术后过程中比较,在术后干预措施方面无统计学差异。对术后症状的进一步分析显示,术后支架置入术组的通气不足、鼻漏和鼻塞比术前明显减少,而术后未支架置入术组的疼痛和鼻漏发生率明显降低。本研究显示,在术后早期干预(局部干预、翻修手术)方面,支架置入术组与非支架置入术组的术后病程无统计学差异。因此,本研究首次显示术后干预率无显著差异,而以往的研究均显示术后干预需求有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信