{"title":"Sustainable ethanol production: CO2 emission analysis and feedstock strategies through life cycle assessment","authors":"Vijay Kumar, Ashish Ranjan Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The environmental impact of ethanol as a substitute for petroleum-based fuels is mainly dependent on its feedstock. This study employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from ethanol production derived from sugarcane, maize, and rice, alongside conventional petrol, to identify the most sustainable option for fuel. The findings reveal that sugarcane, maize, and rice-based ethanol provide the most significant ecological benefits, with net CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of −1.61 kg/L, −0.19 kg/L, and 0.81 kg/L, primarily due to their superior carbon sequestration potential and installation of carbon storage plants in the distilleries, making them environmentally preferable to petrol. Additionally, ethanol demonstrates better combustion properties and a lower carbon intensity compared to petrol, thereby reinforcing its role as a cleaner alternative for energy. The study further highlights that integrating CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies in ethanol distilleries can significantly reduce emissions, thereby enhancing both environmental sustainability and economic feasibility. These insights highlight the potential of ethanol as a viable, low-carbon energy source, particularly when combined with advanced emission-reduction strategies for transportation fuel.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101775"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The environmental impact of ethanol as a substitute for petroleum-based fuels is mainly dependent on its feedstock. This study employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare CO2 emissions from ethanol production derived from sugarcane, maize, and rice, alongside conventional petrol, to identify the most sustainable option for fuel. The findings reveal that sugarcane, maize, and rice-based ethanol provide the most significant ecological benefits, with net CO2 emissions of −1.61 kg/L, −0.19 kg/L, and 0.81 kg/L, primarily due to their superior carbon sequestration potential and installation of carbon storage plants in the distilleries, making them environmentally preferable to petrol. Additionally, ethanol demonstrates better combustion properties and a lower carbon intensity compared to petrol, thereby reinforcing its role as a cleaner alternative for energy. The study further highlights that integrating CO2 capture technologies in ethanol distilleries can significantly reduce emissions, thereby enhancing both environmental sustainability and economic feasibility. These insights highlight the potential of ethanol as a viable, low-carbon energy source, particularly when combined with advanced emission-reduction strategies for transportation fuel.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.