Sustainable ethanol production: CO2 emission analysis and feedstock strategies through life cycle assessment

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Vijay Kumar, Ashish Ranjan Sinha
{"title":"Sustainable ethanol production: CO2 emission analysis and feedstock strategies through life cycle assessment","authors":"Vijay Kumar,&nbsp;Ashish Ranjan Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The environmental impact of ethanol as a substitute for petroleum-based fuels is mainly dependent on its feedstock. This study employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from ethanol production derived from sugarcane, maize, and rice, alongside conventional petrol, to identify the most sustainable option for fuel. The findings reveal that sugarcane, maize, and rice-based ethanol provide the most significant ecological benefits, with net CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of −1.61 kg/L, −0.19 kg/L, and 0.81 kg/L, primarily due to their superior carbon sequestration potential and installation of carbon storage plants in the distilleries, making them environmentally preferable to petrol. Additionally, ethanol demonstrates better combustion properties and a lower carbon intensity compared to petrol, thereby reinforcing its role as a cleaner alternative for energy. The study further highlights that integrating CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies in ethanol distilleries can significantly reduce emissions, thereby enhancing both environmental sustainability and economic feasibility. These insights highlight the potential of ethanol as a viable, low-carbon energy source, particularly when combined with advanced emission-reduction strategies for transportation fuel.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101775"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The environmental impact of ethanol as a substitute for petroleum-based fuels is mainly dependent on its feedstock. This study employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare CO2 emissions from ethanol production derived from sugarcane, maize, and rice, alongside conventional petrol, to identify the most sustainable option for fuel. The findings reveal that sugarcane, maize, and rice-based ethanol provide the most significant ecological benefits, with net CO2 emissions of −1.61 kg/L, −0.19 kg/L, and 0.81 kg/L, primarily due to their superior carbon sequestration potential and installation of carbon storage plants in the distilleries, making them environmentally preferable to petrol. Additionally, ethanol demonstrates better combustion properties and a lower carbon intensity compared to petrol, thereby reinforcing its role as a cleaner alternative for energy. The study further highlights that integrating CO2 capture technologies in ethanol distilleries can significantly reduce emissions, thereby enhancing both environmental sustainability and economic feasibility. These insights highlight the potential of ethanol as a viable, low-carbon energy source, particularly when combined with advanced emission-reduction strategies for transportation fuel.
可持续乙醇生产:通过生命周期评估的CO2排放分析和原料策略
乙醇作为石油基燃料的替代品对环境的影响主要取决于其原料。本研究采用生命周期评估(LCA)来比较甘蔗、玉米和大米乙醇生产的二氧化碳排放量,以及传统汽油,以确定最可持续的燃料选择。研究结果表明,甘蔗、玉米和大米乙醇提供了最显著的生态效益,净二氧化碳排放量分别为- 1.61 kg/L、- 0.19 kg/L和0.81 kg/L,这主要是由于它们具有优越的碳固存潜力,并且在酿酒厂安装了碳储存装置,使它们比汽油更环保。此外,与汽油相比,乙醇表现出更好的燃烧性能和更低的碳强度,从而加强了其作为清洁能源替代品的作用。该研究进一步强调,在乙醇蒸馏厂中整合二氧化碳捕集技术可以显著减少排放,从而提高环境可持续性和经济可行性。这些见解突出了乙醇作为一种可行的低碳能源的潜力,特别是在与先进的运输燃料减排战略相结合的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信