{"title":"Phrasal or clausal grammatical formats of instructions in a boxing ‘mitt-hitting’ activity","authors":"Misao Okada","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper shows how short or longer formats of instruction (i.e. phrases, clauses, or multi-unit turns) emerge in the face-to-face boxing activity of ‘mitt-hitting’: a coach presents a mitt as a target with verbal instructions and the instructed boxer hits it, as they practice one type of punch after another. In this activity, different turn-sizes in the coach's verbal instruction, (e.g. phrases, clauses, or multi-unit turns) are tied to whether or not the participants orient to immediate initiation of the targeted punch proper around when the coach's mitt position is complete and ready. When the participants orient to immediate initiation of the targeted punch proper upon the completed target, the coach's verbal instructions are often short, e.g. noun phrases. In contrast, the instruction formats can be clauses or multi-unit turns, in addition to phrases, when the participant(s) walk or step before the initiation of the punch proper and thus orient to the non-immediacy of initiation of the punch proper vis-à-vis the completed targets. Their walking or stepping allows the coach to produce those longer formats before the punch initiation. Thus, based on multimodal analyses of embodied activity, this study shows that grammatical units are inseparable from the multiple participants' moving bodies, which are directed as a gestalt toward the local implementation of punch initiations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"245 ","pages":"Pages 65-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625001365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper shows how short or longer formats of instruction (i.e. phrases, clauses, or multi-unit turns) emerge in the face-to-face boxing activity of ‘mitt-hitting’: a coach presents a mitt as a target with verbal instructions and the instructed boxer hits it, as they practice one type of punch after another. In this activity, different turn-sizes in the coach's verbal instruction, (e.g. phrases, clauses, or multi-unit turns) are tied to whether or not the participants orient to immediate initiation of the targeted punch proper around when the coach's mitt position is complete and ready. When the participants orient to immediate initiation of the targeted punch proper upon the completed target, the coach's verbal instructions are often short, e.g. noun phrases. In contrast, the instruction formats can be clauses or multi-unit turns, in addition to phrases, when the participant(s) walk or step before the initiation of the punch proper and thus orient to the non-immediacy of initiation of the punch proper vis-à-vis the completed targets. Their walking or stepping allows the coach to produce those longer formats before the punch initiation. Thus, based on multimodal analyses of embodied activity, this study shows that grammatical units are inseparable from the multiple participants' moving bodies, which are directed as a gestalt toward the local implementation of punch initiations.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.