Predictors of Length-of-Stay Among Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients Using a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm

Gregory L. Judson MD , Jeff Luck PhD , Skye Lawrence BA , Rakan Khaki MPH , Harsh Agrawal MD , Krishan Soni MD , Kirsten Tolstrup MD , Vijayadithyan Jaganathan MD , Vaikom S. Mahadevan MD
{"title":"Predictors of Length-of-Stay Among Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients Using a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm","authors":"Gregory L. Judson MD ,&nbsp;Jeff Luck PhD ,&nbsp;Skye Lawrence BA ,&nbsp;Rakan Khaki MPH ,&nbsp;Harsh Agrawal MD ,&nbsp;Krishan Soni MD ,&nbsp;Kirsten Tolstrup MD ,&nbsp;Vijayadithyan Jaganathan MD ,&nbsp;Vaikom S. Mahadevan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay &lt;36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 8","pages":"Article 101902"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25003229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR.

Objectives

This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR.

Methods

Using the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay <36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS.

Results

Twenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week.

Conclusions

ML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR.
使用监督机器学习算法预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的住院时间
背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的住院时间持续改善,但在预测TAVR后的住院时间方面仍存在显著差距。本研究旨在开发一种新的机器学习(ML)算法,以促进对TAVR患者早期和晚期出院的预测因素的理解。方法使用Biome数据集,分析了2017年至2021年美国21个中心的9172例门诊TAVR手术。开发了有监督随机森林ML算法,以识别在70%的Biome数据集样本中涉及短停留时间(SLOS)(停留时间<;36小时)和长停留时间(LLOS)(停留时间≥72小时)的变量。然后在剩余30%的数据集上测试模型,并将结果与预测LOS的标准多变量模型进行比较。结果分别确定了20和22个变量,并将其纳入了SLOS和LLOS多变量模型的重要预测因子。sls(灵敏度0.81,特异度0.70,曲线下面积[AUC] 0.82)和LLOS(灵敏度0.45,特异度0.94,AUC 0.85) ML模型的预测能力均优于标准多变量模型(sls AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65)。我们的研究揭示了几个以前未报道的预测TAVR术后住院时间的因素,如手术时间、术后物理治疗和手术天数。结论sml算法在确定TAVR术后短期和长期住院时间的新预测因素方面可能具有重要作用。这些努力可以促进有针对性的质量改进计划,以减少tavr后的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信