Agroforestry management improves soil surface layer structure and hydrological behavior

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Julia Rossi Pereira , Laura Fernanda Simões da Silva , Anastacia Fontanetti , Miguel Cooper
{"title":"Agroforestry management improves soil surface layer structure and hydrological behavior","authors":"Julia Rossi Pereira ,&nbsp;Laura Fernanda Simões da Silva ,&nbsp;Anastacia Fontanetti ,&nbsp;Miguel Cooper","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long-term inappropriate agricultural and forestry practices can degrade soil structure, compromising critical hydrological functions such as water regulation, groundwater recharge, and storing and filtering of water. This study assessed the hydro-physical attributes of soils under different land uses, aiming to identify their impacts and relationships using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We hypothesized that agroforestry systems (AF) would improve soil structure compared to crop (CR) and forest monocultures (EP). Our findings confirmed improvements in soil structure within the surface layer (0–10 cm) under AF, evidenced by very high infiltration rates (515.5 mm.h⁻¹) compared to CR (93.0 mm.h⁻¹) and EP (154.9 mm.h⁻¹). AF also showed higher total porosity (0.51 m.m<sup>−3</sup>), better aggregate stability, and higher soil organic carbon (SOC), promoting better hydrological functioning. In contrast, CR exhibited higher bulk density (BD) (1.41 g.cm<sup>−1</sup>), lower mean weight diameter (MWD) (1.27 mm), and reduced SOC (12.62 g.kg<sup>−1</sup>), indicating greater erosion susceptibility due to compromised aggregation and infiltration. EP soils showed signs of compaction, with increased BD (1.46 g.cm<sup>−1</sup>), MWD (2.48 mm), and penetration resistance (PR) (2.01 MPa). PCA analysis revealed that land use impacts are more pronounced in surface layers, while subsurface layers are influenced mainly by pedogenetic processes. These results highlight the importance of adopting sustainable practices, such as agroforestry, which minimize soil disturbance and enhance organic matter inputs to maintain soil health and hydrological functioning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 106721"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002752","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term inappropriate agricultural and forestry practices can degrade soil structure, compromising critical hydrological functions such as water regulation, groundwater recharge, and storing and filtering of water. This study assessed the hydro-physical attributes of soils under different land uses, aiming to identify their impacts and relationships using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We hypothesized that agroforestry systems (AF) would improve soil structure compared to crop (CR) and forest monocultures (EP). Our findings confirmed improvements in soil structure within the surface layer (0–10 cm) under AF, evidenced by very high infiltration rates (515.5 mm.h⁻¹) compared to CR (93.0 mm.h⁻¹) and EP (154.9 mm.h⁻¹). AF also showed higher total porosity (0.51 m.m−3), better aggregate stability, and higher soil organic carbon (SOC), promoting better hydrological functioning. In contrast, CR exhibited higher bulk density (BD) (1.41 g.cm−1), lower mean weight diameter (MWD) (1.27 mm), and reduced SOC (12.62 g.kg−1), indicating greater erosion susceptibility due to compromised aggregation and infiltration. EP soils showed signs of compaction, with increased BD (1.46 g.cm−1), MWD (2.48 mm), and penetration resistance (PR) (2.01 MPa). PCA analysis revealed that land use impacts are more pronounced in surface layers, while subsurface layers are influenced mainly by pedogenetic processes. These results highlight the importance of adopting sustainable practices, such as agroforestry, which minimize soil disturbance and enhance organic matter inputs to maintain soil health and hydrological functioning.
农林复合经营改善了土壤表层结构和水文行为
长期不适当的农业和林业做法会使土壤结构退化,损害关键的水文功能,如水调节、地下水补给以及水的储存和过滤。利用主成分分析(PCA)对不同土地利用方式下的土壤水物性特征进行了评价,探讨了不同土地利用方式下土壤水物性特征的影响及其相互关系。我们假设农林复合系统(AF)比作物(CR)和森林单一栽培(EP)更能改善土壤结构。我们的发现证实了AF下表层(0-10 cm)土壤结构的改善,与CR(93.0 mm.h⁻¹)和EP(154.9 mm.h⁻¹)相比,AF的渗透率(515.5 mm.h⁻¹)非常高。土壤总孔隙度较高(0.51 m.m−3),团聚体稳定性较好,土壤有机碳(SOC)含量较高,具有较好的水文功能。相比之下,CR表现出更高的容重(BD)(1.41 g.cm−1),更低的平均重量直径(MWD)(1.27 mm)和更低的有机碳(12.62 g.kg−1),表明由于聚集和渗透的破坏,CR更容易受到侵蚀。EP土壤表现出压实的特征,其压实程度增加,最大钻径增加(1.46 g.cm−1),最大钻径增加(2.48 mm),穿透阻力增加(PR) 2.01 MPa。主成分分析表明,土地利用对表层的影响更为明显,而对亚表层的影响主要受成土作用的影响。这些结果突出了采用可持续做法的重要性,如农林业,这些做法可以最大限度地减少土壤干扰,增加有机质投入,以维持土壤健康和水文功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信