{"title":"Real-world safety profile of lecanemab: A disproportionality analysis of adverse events in the FDA adverse event reporting system","authors":"Jayoung Han, Yuan Fang, Nicole Campbell","doi":"10.1016/j.japhar.2025.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lecanemab, an antiamyloid monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a treatment option for Alzheimer disease. However, there is a pressing need for real-world evidence to inform clinical practice, particularly regarding its safety profile.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with lecanemab using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All cases reporting AEs were included if reported during the study period, from January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, during which a total of 1,307,937 cases were reported in the FAERS database. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess adverse reactions associated with lecanemab. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% CIs were extracted from OpenVigil 2.1-MedDRA-v24 for lecanemab-related events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis identified a total of 1679 AEs associated with lecanemab during the study period. The strongest safety signal was observed for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs), particularly ARIA with hemosiderin deposits in the brain parenchyma or on the pial surface (microhemorrhages, ROR 11,221.5 [95% CI 5706.2–22,067.5]) and ARIA with brain edema or sulcal effusion (edema/effusion, ROR 8927.3 [95% CI 5243.6–15,199.1]). Other notable AEs included infusion-related reactions (ROR 24.9 [95% CI 18.9–32.8]), headache (ROR 10.2 [95% CI 8.6–12.2]), and confusional states (ROR 15.0 [95% CI 11.4–19.7]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring for ARIA and other neurologic and psychiatric AEs associated with lecanemab in real-world clinical settings. The findings highlight the need for ongoing postmarket surveillance to ensure patient safety and guide clinical decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100736,"journal":{"name":"JAPhA Pharmacotherapy","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPhA Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949962325000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Lecanemab, an antiamyloid monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a treatment option for Alzheimer disease. However, there is a pressing need for real-world evidence to inform clinical practice, particularly regarding its safety profile.
Objectives
This study aimed to analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with lecanemab using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
Methods
All cases reporting AEs were included if reported during the study period, from January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, during which a total of 1,307,937 cases were reported in the FAERS database. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess adverse reactions associated with lecanemab. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% CIs were extracted from OpenVigil 2.1-MedDRA-v24 for lecanemab-related events.
Results
The analysis identified a total of 1679 AEs associated with lecanemab during the study period. The strongest safety signal was observed for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs), particularly ARIA with hemosiderin deposits in the brain parenchyma or on the pial surface (microhemorrhages, ROR 11,221.5 [95% CI 5706.2–22,067.5]) and ARIA with brain edema or sulcal effusion (edema/effusion, ROR 8927.3 [95% CI 5243.6–15,199.1]). Other notable AEs included infusion-related reactions (ROR 24.9 [95% CI 18.9–32.8]), headache (ROR 10.2 [95% CI 8.6–12.2]), and confusional states (ROR 15.0 [95% CI 11.4–19.7]).
Conclusion
This study underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring for ARIA and other neurologic and psychiatric AEs associated with lecanemab in real-world clinical settings. The findings highlight the need for ongoing postmarket surveillance to ensure patient safety and guide clinical decision making.
lecanemab是一种抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体,已成为治疗阿尔茨海默病的一种选择。然而,迫切需要真实世界的证据来告知临床实践,特别是关于其安全性。本研究旨在利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库分析与莱卡耐单抗相关的不良事件(ae)。方法纳入研究期间(2023年1月1日至2024年6月30日)报告的所有ae病例,FAERS数据库共报告1,307,937例ae病例。进行歧化分析以评估与莱卡耐单抗相关的不良反应。从OpenVigil 2.1-MedDRA-v24中提取了95% ci的报告优势比(RORs),用于研究lecanemab相关事件。结果在研究期间共鉴定出1679例与lecanemab相关的ae。淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常(ARIAs)的安全性信号最强,尤其是伴有含铁血黄素沉积在脑实质或脑顶表面的ARIAs(微出血,ROR 11,221.5 [95% CI 5706.2-22,067.5])和伴有脑水肿或脑沟积液的ARIAs(水肿/积液,ROR 8927.3 [95% CI 5243.6-15,199.1])。其他显著的ae包括输注相关反应(ROR 24.9 [95% CI 18.9-32.8])、头痛(ROR 10.2 [95% CI 8.6-12.2])和精神错乱状态(ROR 15.0 [95% CI 11.4-19.7])。结论:本研究强调了在现实世界的临床环境中警惕监测ARIA和其他与莱卡耐单抗相关的神经和精神不良事件的重要性。研究结果强调需要持续的上市后监测,以确保患者安全并指导临床决策。