“Should I continue with this profession or not?”: moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among Swiss healthcare workers

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Elisabeth Stock , Andrea Martani , Olga Vinogradova , Fabienne Moser , Bernice S. Elger , Tenzin Wangmo
{"title":"“Should I continue with this profession or not?”: moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among Swiss healthcare workers","authors":"Elisabeth Stock ,&nbsp;Andrea Martani ,&nbsp;Olga Vinogradova ,&nbsp;Fabienne Moser ,&nbsp;Bernice S. Elger ,&nbsp;Tenzin Wangmo","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic led to an extraordinary situation of resource scarcity and pushed healthcare to its limits. Consequently, healthcare professionals (HCPs) faced moral and ethical challenges that served as potential triggers for moral distress. The purpose of this study was to identify moral distress experiences of HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in the German part of Switzerland. We utilized thematic analysis to examine the data and oriented within the relativist/constructionist framework. We identified four themes: 1) The burden of moral distress explores examples of morally distressing situations; 2) Precipitating factors encompass the underlying conditions that contributed to moral distress; 3) Mitigating factors refer to the elements that helped reduce the intensity of moral distress or, in some cases, prevented it from arising altogether; 4) Coping strategies capture how participants actively managed or adapted to experiences of moral distress. Our findings relay that the level of experienced moral distress is linked to the nature of the work as it was more commonly experienced by those with greater direct contact with patients and residents. Frontline HCPs found team support interventions – such as availability of low-threshold supervision – to be especially helpful in coping with moral distress. Participants in leadership positions expressed that teamwork in decision-making alleviated their moral burdens. Our findings highlight the need to address moral distress through national policies and pandemic preparedness plans, to protect healthcare workers and ensure healthcare system resilience in future crises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152500068X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to an extraordinary situation of resource scarcity and pushed healthcare to its limits. Consequently, healthcare professionals (HCPs) faced moral and ethical challenges that served as potential triggers for moral distress. The purpose of this study was to identify moral distress experiences of HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in the German part of Switzerland. We utilized thematic analysis to examine the data and oriented within the relativist/constructionist framework. We identified four themes: 1) The burden of moral distress explores examples of morally distressing situations; 2) Precipitating factors encompass the underlying conditions that contributed to moral distress; 3) Mitigating factors refer to the elements that helped reduce the intensity of moral distress or, in some cases, prevented it from arising altogether; 4) Coping strategies capture how participants actively managed or adapted to experiences of moral distress. Our findings relay that the level of experienced moral distress is linked to the nature of the work as it was more commonly experienced by those with greater direct contact with patients and residents. Frontline HCPs found team support interventions – such as availability of low-threshold supervision – to be especially helpful in coping with moral distress. Participants in leadership positions expressed that teamwork in decision-making alleviated their moral burdens. Our findings highlight the need to address moral distress through national policies and pandemic preparedness plans, to protect healthcare workers and ensure healthcare system resilience in future crises.
“我是否应该继续这个职业?”: 2019冠状病毒病大流行期间瑞士医护人员的道德困境
2019冠状病毒病大流行导致资源极度短缺,将医疗保健推向极限。因此,医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)面临道德和伦理挑战,这是道德困境的潜在触发因素。本研究的目的是确定在COVID-19大流行期间医务人员的道德痛苦经历。我们对在瑞士德国部分工作的医护人员进行了30次半结构化访谈。我们利用主题分析来检验数据,并在相对主义/建构主义框架内进行定位。我们确定了四个主题:1)道德困境的负担探讨了道德困境的例子;2)促发因素包括导致道德困境的潜在条件;3)减轻因素是指有助于减轻道德痛苦的强度,或者在某些情况下完全防止道德痛苦产生的因素;4)应对策略捕捉参与者如何积极管理或适应道德困境的经历。我们的研究结果表明,经历道德痛苦的程度与工作的性质有关,因为与病人和住院医生有更多直接接触的人更常经历这种痛苦。一线医护人员发现团队支持干预——比如低门槛监督的可用性——在应对道德困境方面特别有帮助。担任领导职务的参与者表示,决策过程中的团队合作减轻了他们的道德负担。我们的研究结果强调需要通过国家政策和大流行防范计划来解决道德困境,以保护医护人员并确保医疗保健系统在未来危机中的复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信