Hannah van Alebeek , Sercan Kahveci , Reinout W. Wiers , Jens Blechert
{"title":"Mechanisms of emotional eating and drinking: Sadness increases approach bias and craving for chocolate and alcohol","authors":"Hannah van Alebeek , Sercan Kahveci , Reinout W. Wiers , Jens Blechert","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Negative affect can trigger overconsumption of appetitive substances, but specific mechanisms and trait-level risk factors remain unclear. In two pre-registered studies, we tested whether negative affect increases approach bias and craving for chocolate and alcohol, with strongest effects expected in individuals with self-reported emotional intake.</div><div>In Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 87), negative or neutral affect was induced on separate days, followed by an approach-avoidance-task and craving ratings. Study 2 employed a more potent affect induction and larger sample (<em>N</em> = 132).</div><div>In Study 1, affect induction failed, so we analyzed incidental variations in <em>self-reported</em> sadness. Approach biases and cravings to chocolate and alcohol were stronger during sessions with higher sadness. Study 2 replicated and extended this finding by showing that <em>induced</em> negative affect increased biases and cravings. Further, trait emotional eaters showed a stronger affect-related increase in chocolate bias, while trait emotional drinkers exhibited stronger biases independent of affect.</div><div>Craving and approach bias increases help explain why self-regulation may fail under emotional distress. Consistent findings for chocolate and alcohol suggests their potential generalizability across appetitive substances. Trait questionnaires can be regarded as risk indicators, offering a basis for tailored interventions by identifying who is vulnerable to overconsumption and when.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 113333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925002958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Negative affect can trigger overconsumption of appetitive substances, but specific mechanisms and trait-level risk factors remain unclear. In two pre-registered studies, we tested whether negative affect increases approach bias and craving for chocolate and alcohol, with strongest effects expected in individuals with self-reported emotional intake.
In Study 1 (N = 87), negative or neutral affect was induced on separate days, followed by an approach-avoidance-task and craving ratings. Study 2 employed a more potent affect induction and larger sample (N = 132).
In Study 1, affect induction failed, so we analyzed incidental variations in self-reported sadness. Approach biases and cravings to chocolate and alcohol were stronger during sessions with higher sadness. Study 2 replicated and extended this finding by showing that induced negative affect increased biases and cravings. Further, trait emotional eaters showed a stronger affect-related increase in chocolate bias, while trait emotional drinkers exhibited stronger biases independent of affect.
Craving and approach bias increases help explain why self-regulation may fail under emotional distress. Consistent findings for chocolate and alcohol suggests their potential generalizability across appetitive substances. Trait questionnaires can be regarded as risk indicators, offering a basis for tailored interventions by identifying who is vulnerable to overconsumption and when.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.