Tracking orthodontic tooth movement and associated biomechanics using an integrated clinical and in vitro mechanical approach

Arya Subramanian , Robyn de Wet , Lingyu Bu , Manuel O. Lagravere , Paul W. Major , Dan L. Romanyk
{"title":"Tracking orthodontic tooth movement and associated biomechanics using an integrated clinical and in vitro mechanical approach","authors":"Arya Subramanian ,&nbsp;Robyn de Wet ,&nbsp;Lingyu Bu ,&nbsp;Manuel O. Lagravere ,&nbsp;Paul W. Major ,&nbsp;Dan L. Romanyk","doi":"10.1016/j.bea.2025.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to establish an integrated clinical and <em>in vitro</em> experimental approach to track tooth positions and replicate digital tooth positions <em>in vitro</em> for biomechanical load measurement over orthodontic treatment. Patients between 11–14 years were recruited to collect four digital intraoral scans in 4–6-week intervals. Patients were treated for mild anterior crowding using 0.022″ Damon Q2 brackets and CuNiTi round archwires sized up at each treatment interval (T1-T2: 0.014″, T2-T3: 0.016″, T3-T4: 0.018″). Scans were superimposed and clinical tooth movement was tracked using bracket-slot midpoint position differences. An in-house workflow was developed using MATLAB and SolidWorks to replicate digital bracket positions on an Orthodontic Simulator (OSIM) with custom-dimensioned jigs. Mechanical experiments for the sample arches were performed at 37°C for 3D force measurements at each tooth upon wire insertion (<em>n</em> = 5/archwire size). The average superimposition error between T2-T4 and T1 scans was 0.19 mm. Average errors in bracket position replication across all directions was 0.41 mm in the local X-, Y-, and Z-direction, respectively. The initial force and tooth movement range was 0.00–1.43 N and 0.01–1.81 mm in the Y-direction, and 0.01–2.17 N and 0.00–1.45 mm in the Z-direction. Tooth movement ranged from 0.00–0.30 mm/week in the Y-direction and 0.00–0.24 mm/week in the Z-direction over treatment. This study developed a process to measure clinical tooth movement and existing force/moment systems for sample arches over orthodontic braces treatment. Future work will involve an expanded data set to establish fundamental relationships between force systems and clinical tooth movements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72384,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering advances","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667099225000428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish an integrated clinical and in vitro experimental approach to track tooth positions and replicate digital tooth positions in vitro for biomechanical load measurement over orthodontic treatment. Patients between 11–14 years were recruited to collect four digital intraoral scans in 4–6-week intervals. Patients were treated for mild anterior crowding using 0.022″ Damon Q2 brackets and CuNiTi round archwires sized up at each treatment interval (T1-T2: 0.014″, T2-T3: 0.016″, T3-T4: 0.018″). Scans were superimposed and clinical tooth movement was tracked using bracket-slot midpoint position differences. An in-house workflow was developed using MATLAB and SolidWorks to replicate digital bracket positions on an Orthodontic Simulator (OSIM) with custom-dimensioned jigs. Mechanical experiments for the sample arches were performed at 37°C for 3D force measurements at each tooth upon wire insertion (n = 5/archwire size). The average superimposition error between T2-T4 and T1 scans was 0.19 mm. Average errors in bracket position replication across all directions was 0.41 mm in the local X-, Y-, and Z-direction, respectively. The initial force and tooth movement range was 0.00–1.43 N and 0.01–1.81 mm in the Y-direction, and 0.01–2.17 N and 0.00–1.45 mm in the Z-direction. Tooth movement ranged from 0.00–0.30 mm/week in the Y-direction and 0.00–0.24 mm/week in the Z-direction over treatment. This study developed a process to measure clinical tooth movement and existing force/moment systems for sample arches over orthodontic braces treatment. Future work will involve an expanded data set to establish fundamental relationships between force systems and clinical tooth movements.
使用综合临床和体外机械方法跟踪正畸牙齿运动和相关的生物力学
本研究的目的是建立一种综合的临床和体外实验方法来跟踪牙齿位置,并在体外复制数字牙齿位置,用于正畸治疗期间的生物力学载荷测量。招募11-14岁的患者,每隔4 - 6周收集4次数字口内扫描。患者使用0.022″Damon Q2托架和CuNiTi圆形弓丝治疗轻度前路拥挤(T1-T2: 0.014″,T2-T3: 0.016″,T3-T4: 0.018″)。将扫描结果进行叠加,并利用托槽中点位置差跟踪临床牙齿运动。利用MATLAB和SolidWorks开发了一个内部工作流程,在具有定制尺寸夹具的正畸模拟器(OSIM)上复制数字支架位置。在37°C的温度下对样品弓进行力学实验,测量每个牙齿插入金属丝时的三维力(n = 5/弓丝尺寸)。T2-T4与T1扫描的平均叠加误差为0.19 mm。在局部X、Y和z方向上,所有方向上支架位置复制的平均误差分别为0.41 mm。初始力和齿的运动范围分别为:y方向为0.00-1.43 N和0.01-1.81 mm, z方向为0.01-2.17 N和0.00-1.45 mm。在治疗过程中,牙齿在y方向上的移动幅度为0.00-0.30 mm/周,在z方向上的移动幅度为0.00-0.24 mm/周。本研究开发了一个过程来测量临床牙齿运动和现有的力/力矩系统的样本弓在正畸牙套治疗。未来的工作将包括扩展数据集,以建立力系统和临床牙齿运动之间的基本关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical engineering advances
Biomedical engineering advances Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信