Surgical wisdom as phronesis: An evidence-based hypothesis about “understanding… the great gray that exists in the field”

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109509
Jonathan D. D'Angelo PhD, MAEd , David A. Cook MD, MHPE , McKenna L. Schimmel MD , Nikhil Kapur BS , Ellen Mi BS , Mariela Rivera MD , Anne-Lise D. D'Angelo MD, MSEd
{"title":"Surgical wisdom as phronesis: An evidence-based hypothesis about “understanding… the great gray that exists in the field”","authors":"Jonathan D. D'Angelo PhD, MAEd ,&nbsp;David A. Cook MD, MHPE ,&nbsp;McKenna L. Schimmel MD ,&nbsp;Nikhil Kapur BS ,&nbsp;Ellen Mi BS ,&nbsp;Mariela Rivera MD ,&nbsp;Anne-Lise D. D'Angelo MD, MSEd","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surgeons make vital decisions in the face of uncertainty, yet, the development of surgical wisdom necessary to make these choices prudently remains understudied and undefined. On the basis of previous commentary, we asked whether phronesis, the ability to combine epistemic knowledge and technical skill and choose the best action from many possible right actions, provides a useful conceptual framework to explicate the notion of surgical wisdom.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a thematic analysis. One-hour in-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of faculty surgeons from 2 hospitals. Participants described experiences observing, acting with, and teaching surgical wisdom. We interpreted our findings through our proposed lens of phronesis. We applied deductive and inductive thematic coding, with deductive codes based on previously established definitions and components of phronesis and inductive codes aimed to capture additional aspects of surgical wisdom. Authors read interview transcripts, applied codes, synthesized findings into main themes and subthemes by group consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-one surgeons participated. Surgeon participant comments provided empirical support for understanding surgical wisdom as phronesis, a capacity distinct from medical knowledge and technical skill that allows one to understand and competently make choices in situations characterized by competing values, ill-defined rules, and unique circumstances. Comments supported previously proposed functions of phronesis (constitutive, integrative, blueprint, emotional regulative). Novel themes emerged related to the building blocks necessary for the development of surgical wisdom: variety of experience, failure, openness to change/growth mindset, and challenging situations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Phronetic knowledge and its associated functions and building blocks provide new concepts to help refine, restructure, and reconceptualize how surgeons view their developmental trajectory and the path to surgical wisdom. This research offers a vision of practice that can help redefine professional goals and our understanding of success as a surgeon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 109509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025003617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgeons make vital decisions in the face of uncertainty, yet, the development of surgical wisdom necessary to make these choices prudently remains understudied and undefined. On the basis of previous commentary, we asked whether phronesis, the ability to combine epistemic knowledge and technical skill and choose the best action from many possible right actions, provides a useful conceptual framework to explicate the notion of surgical wisdom.

Methods

We conducted a thematic analysis. One-hour in-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of faculty surgeons from 2 hospitals. Participants described experiences observing, acting with, and teaching surgical wisdom. We interpreted our findings through our proposed lens of phronesis. We applied deductive and inductive thematic coding, with deductive codes based on previously established definitions and components of phronesis and inductive codes aimed to capture additional aspects of surgical wisdom. Authors read interview transcripts, applied codes, synthesized findings into main themes and subthemes by group consensus.

Results

Thirty-one surgeons participated. Surgeon participant comments provided empirical support for understanding surgical wisdom as phronesis, a capacity distinct from medical knowledge and technical skill that allows one to understand and competently make choices in situations characterized by competing values, ill-defined rules, and unique circumstances. Comments supported previously proposed functions of phronesis (constitutive, integrative, blueprint, emotional regulative). Novel themes emerged related to the building blocks necessary for the development of surgical wisdom: variety of experience, failure, openness to change/growth mindset, and challenging situations.

Conclusion

Phronetic knowledge and its associated functions and building blocks provide new concepts to help refine, restructure, and reconceptualize how surgeons view their developmental trajectory and the path to surgical wisdom. This research offers a vision of practice that can help redefine professional goals and our understanding of success as a surgeon.
作为实践的外科智慧:一个基于证据的假设,关于“理解……存在于该领域的巨大灰色”。
外科医生在面对不确定性时做出重要的决定,然而,外科智慧的发展需要谨慎地做出这些选择,仍然没有得到充分的研究和定义。在之前评论的基础上,我们提出了phronesis,即结合认知知识和技术技能并从许多可能的正确行动中选择最佳行动的能力,是否提供了一个有用的概念框架来解释手术智慧的概念。方法进行专题分析。对来自两家医院的外科医生进行了一小时的深度半结构化访谈。参与者描述了观察、行动和传授外科智慧的经历。我们通过我们提出的phronesis透镜来解释我们的发现。我们应用演绎和归纳主题编码,演绎代码基于先前建立的定义和phronesis和归纳代码的组成部分,旨在捕捉手术智慧的其他方面。作者阅读采访记录,应用代码,通过小组共识将研究结果合成为主题和副主题。结果31名外科医生参与。外科医生参与者的评论为理解作为实践的外科智慧提供了经验支持,实践智慧是一种不同于医学知识和技术技能的能力,它使人们能够在具有竞争性价值观、不明确规则和独特环境的情况下理解并有能力做出选择。评论支持先前提出的phronesis功能(构成、整合、蓝图、情绪调节)。与外科智慧发展所需的构建模块相关的新主题出现了:经验的多样性,失败,对变化/成长心态的开放性以及具有挑战性的情况。结论颅相学知识及其相关功能和构建模块提供了新的概念,有助于完善、重构和重新概念化外科医生如何看待他们的发展轨迹和外科智慧之路。这项研究提供了一种实践的愿景,可以帮助重新定义职业目标和我们对外科医生成功的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信