Xihai Ni , Qing Zhang , Zhen Peng , Yunlong Tang , Fangzhou Dong , Xiaoyu Wang , Qiang Gao
{"title":"Inverse design of self-rotating dual-platform biomimetic mechanical metamaterials via additive manufacturing","authors":"Xihai Ni , Qing Zhang , Zhen Peng , Yunlong Tang , Fangzhou Dong , Xiaoyu Wang , Qiang Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To enhance the mechanical properties of auxetic structures, numerous designs have been developed and analyzed. However, many existing methodologies lack comprehensive principles to effectively guide other structural design processes. In this study, a novel buckling-based biological windmill auxetic structure is introduced. First, a comparative analysis of the mechanical properties across different biological windmill structures was conducted. Then, a buckling design approach was employed to enhance the deformation characteristics and stress-strain behavior of windmill auxetic structures. Finally, an inverse design process was implemented to identify the optimal target structural parameters by Bayesian-optimized Gaussian process regression models. The results indicate that the “X” crossbar design method achieves greater specific energy absorption (SEA), smoother platform stress, making it particularly suitable for shock energy absorption applications. Additionally, the re-entrant structure design method demonstrates superior SEA, and outstanding crushing energy absorption (CFE). The buckling design of the support rod not only provides exceptional SEA but also exhibits favorable crushing modes. This study advances the concept of rotating auxetic structures, by investigating their crushing behavior and energy absorption characteristics, offering valuable insights for the further development of auxetic structural design methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"341 ","pages":"Article 120844"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625012350","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To enhance the mechanical properties of auxetic structures, numerous designs have been developed and analyzed. However, many existing methodologies lack comprehensive principles to effectively guide other structural design processes. In this study, a novel buckling-based biological windmill auxetic structure is introduced. First, a comparative analysis of the mechanical properties across different biological windmill structures was conducted. Then, a buckling design approach was employed to enhance the deformation characteristics and stress-strain behavior of windmill auxetic structures. Finally, an inverse design process was implemented to identify the optimal target structural parameters by Bayesian-optimized Gaussian process regression models. The results indicate that the “X” crossbar design method achieves greater specific energy absorption (SEA), smoother platform stress, making it particularly suitable for shock energy absorption applications. Additionally, the re-entrant structure design method demonstrates superior SEA, and outstanding crushing energy absorption (CFE). The buckling design of the support rod not only provides exceptional SEA but also exhibits favorable crushing modes. This study advances the concept of rotating auxetic structures, by investigating their crushing behavior and energy absorption characteristics, offering valuable insights for the further development of auxetic structural design methodologies.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.