Did clean cooking interventions fail or succeed? Community insights from rural India

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Kelechukwu Kelvin Ibe , Shiva Prasad Kollur
{"title":"Did clean cooking interventions fail or succeed? Community insights from rural India","authors":"Kelechukwu Kelvin Ibe ,&nbsp;Shiva Prasad Kollur","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Various clean cooking intervention programs have been initiated over the years by the government, academia and non-governmental organisations to ensure universal clean and modern energy for all. Assessment of these projects is necessary to scale up the intervention or re-strategise the approach for more effectiveness and efficiency. This study took a qualitative approach to assess three clean cooking interventions (PMUY, Improved Cookstove and Smokeless Chulha) in Guptapada, a rural village in Khordha district, Odisha, India. A three-step research approach involving participant identification and selection using purposive and simple random sampling, data collection via interviews (48), key informant discussions (8), and focus group discussions (9) and data analysis and interpretation using thematic analysis was used. Insights from the study's results show that the clean cooking projects did not yield corresponding success stemming from economic difficulty, awareness, the COVID-19 pandemic, misconceptions, and stove performance, among others. Based on these, recommendations such as integrating awareness and the theory of change framework as part of clean cooking interventions were made for effective approaches to tackling clean cooking in rural and remote villages and ensuring that current and future interventions fulfil the objective among the rural populace. This study contributes to the existing knowledge base through a user-based experience of three different interventions offering pathways for fueling change towards clean cooking interventions and effective adoption in rural India. This leads to an increase in the proportion of population with primary reliance on clean cooking fuels and technology for cooking (Target 7.1.2) and renewable energy share (Target 7.2.1).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104196"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002774","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various clean cooking intervention programs have been initiated over the years by the government, academia and non-governmental organisations to ensure universal clean and modern energy for all. Assessment of these projects is necessary to scale up the intervention or re-strategise the approach for more effectiveness and efficiency. This study took a qualitative approach to assess three clean cooking interventions (PMUY, Improved Cookstove and Smokeless Chulha) in Guptapada, a rural village in Khordha district, Odisha, India. A three-step research approach involving participant identification and selection using purposive and simple random sampling, data collection via interviews (48), key informant discussions (8), and focus group discussions (9) and data analysis and interpretation using thematic analysis was used. Insights from the study's results show that the clean cooking projects did not yield corresponding success stemming from economic difficulty, awareness, the COVID-19 pandemic, misconceptions, and stove performance, among others. Based on these, recommendations such as integrating awareness and the theory of change framework as part of clean cooking interventions were made for effective approaches to tackling clean cooking in rural and remote villages and ensuring that current and future interventions fulfil the objective among the rural populace. This study contributes to the existing knowledge base through a user-based experience of three different interventions offering pathways for fueling change towards clean cooking interventions and effective adoption in rural India. This leads to an increase in the proportion of population with primary reliance on clean cooking fuels and technology for cooking (Target 7.1.2) and renewable energy share (Target 7.2.1).
清洁烹饪干预是成功了还是失败了?来自印度农村的社区见解
多年来,政府、学术界和非政府组织发起了各种清洁烹饪干预计划,以确保人人享有清洁和现代的能源。有必要对这些项目进行评估,以扩大干预措施或重新制定战略,以提高效果和效率。本研究采用定性方法评估了印度奥里萨邦Khordha区的Guptapada村的三种清洁烹饪干预措施(PMUY、改良炉灶和无烟Chulha)。采用三步研究方法,包括有目的和简单随机抽样的参与者识别和选择,通过访谈收集数据(48),关键信息提供者讨论(8)和焦点小组讨论(9),以及使用主题分析的数据分析和解释。研究结果表明,由于经济困难、意识、COVID-19大流行、误解和炉子性能等因素,清洁烹饪项目没有取得相应的成功。在此基础上,提出了一些建议,如将认识和变革理论框架作为清洁烹饪干预措施的一部分,以便采取有效办法解决农村和偏远村庄的清洁烹饪问题,并确保当前和未来的干预措施实现农村人口的目标。本研究通过以用户为基础的三种不同干预措施的体验,为促进印度农村清洁烹饪干预措施的变革和有效采用提供了途径,从而为现有知识库做出了贡献。这导致主要依赖清洁烹饪燃料和烹饪技术的人口比例(目标7.1.2)和可再生能源份额(目标7.2.1)的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信