Pitfalls of the green transition: Towards a genuine understanding of the right to free, prior and informed consent of the Indigenous peoples

IF 1.5 4区 地球科学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Yuko Osakada
{"title":"Pitfalls of the green transition: Towards a genuine understanding of the right to free, prior and informed consent of the Indigenous peoples","authors":"Yuko Osakada","doi":"10.1016/j.polar.2024.101119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines the changes required to make the green transition more inclusive and sustainable from an international human rights perspective. Indigenous peoples have been challenging the ways in which this transition is taking place, using the phrase “green colonialism.” Although, in many countries, it has become common to consult affected Indigenous peoples to reach an agreement before licensing the establishment of green energy facilities, previous studies that dealt with the Sámi's struggle against the green transition have revealed that asymmetric power relationship between Indigenous peoples, sovereign states and business enterprises contributed to disguised dialogues and/or agreements among them. Therefore, this article concludes that a genuine shift from the obligation to consult Indigenous peoples to their right to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) is crucial when establishing green energy facilities that might affect them. In doing so, this article emphasizes that the meaning of the right to FPIC for Indigenous peoples should be understood correctly from an international human rights perspective. In particular, it argues that their right to FPIC should be ensured not only before the project affecting Indigenous peoples is licensed, but also at all stages of implementing the project with participatory monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20316,"journal":{"name":"Polar Science","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873965224001075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the changes required to make the green transition more inclusive and sustainable from an international human rights perspective. Indigenous peoples have been challenging the ways in which this transition is taking place, using the phrase “green colonialism.” Although, in many countries, it has become common to consult affected Indigenous peoples to reach an agreement before licensing the establishment of green energy facilities, previous studies that dealt with the Sámi's struggle against the green transition have revealed that asymmetric power relationship between Indigenous peoples, sovereign states and business enterprises contributed to disguised dialogues and/or agreements among them. Therefore, this article concludes that a genuine shift from the obligation to consult Indigenous peoples to their right to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) is crucial when establishing green energy facilities that might affect them. In doing so, this article emphasizes that the meaning of the right to FPIC for Indigenous peoples should be understood correctly from an international human rights perspective. In particular, it argues that their right to FPIC should be ensured not only before the project affecting Indigenous peoples is licensed, but also at all stages of implementing the project with participatory monitoring.
绿色转型的陷阱:实现对土著人民自由、事先和知情同意权的真正理解
本文从国际人权的角度探讨了使绿色转型更具包容性和可持续性所需的变化。土著人民一直在用“绿色殖民主义”来挑战这种转变的方式。尽管在许多国家,在许可建立绿色能源设施之前,与受影响的土著人民协商达成协议已经成为一种普遍现象,但之前关于Sámi反对绿色转型的研究表明,土著人民、主权国家和商业企业之间不对称的权力关系导致了他们之间变相的对话和/或协议。因此,本文的结论是,在建立可能影响土著人民的绿色能源设施时,从与土著人民协商的义务真正转向他们的自由、事先和知情同意权(FPIC)至关重要。在此过程中,本文强调应从国际人权的角度正确理解土著人民FPIC权利的含义。它特别指出,不仅在影响土著人民的项目获得许可之前,而且在项目实施的所有阶段都应确保土著人民的知情权利,并进行参与性监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polar Science
Polar Science ECOLOGY-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Polar Science is an international, peer-reviewed quarterly journal. It is dedicated to publishing original research articles for sciences relating to the polar regions of the Earth and other planets. Polar Science aims to cover 15 disciplines which are listed below; they cover most aspects of physical sciences, geosciences and life sciences, together with engineering and social sciences. Articles should attract the interest of broad polar science communities, and not be limited to the interests of those who work under specific research subjects. Polar Science also has an Open Archive whereby published articles are made freely available from ScienceDirect after an embargo period of 24 months from the date of publication. - Space and upper atmosphere physics - Atmospheric science/climatology - Glaciology - Oceanography/sea ice studies - Geology/petrology - Solid earth geophysics/seismology - Marine Earth science - Geomorphology/Cenozoic-Quaternary geology - Meteoritics - Terrestrial biology - Marine biology - Animal ecology - Environment - Polar Engineering - Humanities and social sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信