Harvest legacies and climate change interact to shape forest structure and biomass through time

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lucien Fitzpatrick , Bailey A. Murphy , Meghan G. Midgley , Ankur R. Desai , Michael C. Dietze , Kurt Dreisilker , Christine R. Rollinson
{"title":"Harvest legacies and climate change interact to shape forest structure and biomass through time","authors":"Lucien Fitzpatrick ,&nbsp;Bailey A. Murphy ,&nbsp;Meghan G. Midgley ,&nbsp;Ankur R. Desai ,&nbsp;Michael C. Dietze ,&nbsp;Kurt Dreisilker ,&nbsp;Christine R. Rollinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest structural change driven by climate trends has been observed worldwide and is expected to increase in the future. Management of forest structure has been an important tool for mitigating the impacts of climate change but forest structure may shift independently of management goals as it interacts with climate change. Here, we investigated the long-term impacts of harvest-based management strategies on structure and resistance to climate-induced biomass loss using a process-based ecosystem model for a midwestern USA hardwood forest. We identified aboveground biomass loss events and compared the cumulative number of these events following a five-year period of active management under four management strategies and two climate change scenarios. Management legacy had the clearest impact on climate-driven biomass loss over the mid-term (∼25 years) with the shelterwood scenario experiencing no loss events during this period. However, by the end of the century legacy effects faded and climate change severity became the driver of differences as greater warming scenarios experienced twice the loss events, and end-of-century loss events were 3–10 times more frequent than mid-century events. We found that while structure was distinct among harvest scenarios through the mid-century, differences were negligible by the end-of-century; identical to when management correlated with loss event frequency. We found that loss events were preceded by a drop in precipitation two years prior, while no specific forest structure preceded a loss event. However, the structures preceding a biomass loss event were distinct across different legacies, implying additional influences of past management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"390 ","pages":"Article 126272"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725022480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest structural change driven by climate trends has been observed worldwide and is expected to increase in the future. Management of forest structure has been an important tool for mitigating the impacts of climate change but forest structure may shift independently of management goals as it interacts with climate change. Here, we investigated the long-term impacts of harvest-based management strategies on structure and resistance to climate-induced biomass loss using a process-based ecosystem model for a midwestern USA hardwood forest. We identified aboveground biomass loss events and compared the cumulative number of these events following a five-year period of active management under four management strategies and two climate change scenarios. Management legacy had the clearest impact on climate-driven biomass loss over the mid-term (∼25 years) with the shelterwood scenario experiencing no loss events during this period. However, by the end of the century legacy effects faded and climate change severity became the driver of differences as greater warming scenarios experienced twice the loss events, and end-of-century loss events were 3–10 times more frequent than mid-century events. We found that while structure was distinct among harvest scenarios through the mid-century, differences were negligible by the end-of-century; identical to when management correlated with loss event frequency. We found that loss events were preceded by a drop in precipitation two years prior, while no specific forest structure preceded a loss event. However, the structures preceding a biomass loss event were distinct across different legacies, implying additional influences of past management.
随着时间的推移,收获遗产和气候变化相互作用塑造了森林结构和生物量
由气候趋势驱动的森林结构变化已在世界范围内观察到,预计未来还会增加。森林结构管理是缓解气候变化影响的重要工具,但森林结构与气候变化相互作用,可能独立于管理目标而发生变化。本文以美国中西部阔叶林为研究对象,采用基于过程的生态系统模型,研究了以收获为基础的管理策略对结构和对气候引起的生物量损失的抵抗力的长期影响。我们确定了地上生物量损失事件,并比较了在四种管理策略和两种气候变化情景下主动管理五年后这些事件的累积数量。管理遗产在中期(~ 25年)对气候驱动的生物量损失的影响最为明显,在此期间防护林情景没有发生损失事件。然而,到本世纪末,遗产效应逐渐消退,气候变化的严重性成为差异的驱动因素,因为更大的变暖情景经历了两倍的损失事件,并且世纪末的损失事件比本世纪中叶的事件频繁3-10倍。我们发现,虽然在本世纪中叶的收获情景中,结构是不同的,但到本世纪末,差异可以忽略不计;与管理与损失事件频率相关时相同。我们发现,在损失事件发生之前,两年前的降水量会下降,而在损失事件发生之前,没有特定的森林结构。然而,在生物量损失事件之前的结构在不同的遗产中是不同的,这意味着过去管理的额外影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信