{"title":"Antibacterial activity of Pycnostachys abyssinica and Rhamnus prinoides root and leaf extracts against targeted bacterial strains","authors":"Daniel Mulu , Tsegaye Amsalu , Galana Abaya , Asefa Alemu , Muluneh Temesgen","doi":"10.1016/j.bcab.2025.103656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The flora of Ethiopia comprises 6,500 to 7,000 species, with 12–19 % being endemic, including valuable medicinal plants. The study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of <em>Pycnostachys abyssinica</em> and <em>Rhamnus prinoides</em> root and leaf extracts against bacteria associated with various infections, particularly in clinical settings. Four different bacterial species associated with human infections in clinical settings namely; <em>Staphylococcus epidermidis</em> (ATCC 25923), <em>Enterobacter aerogenes</em> (ATCC 25922), <em>Streptococcus pyogenes</em> (ATCC 49619), and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (ATCC 27853) were obtained from the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI). The extraction and phytochemical screening were conducted using ethanol, methanol, and aqueous solvents. The antibacterial activity of the extracts was assessed using disc diffusion on agar medium, as well as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) analysis. The qualitative phytochemical analysis of the extracts indicated varied phytochemical profiles among the plant species, their parts, and the extraction solvents used. The most susceptible bacterial species in the present study, based on MIC and MBC values, were <em>P. aeruginosa</em> and <em>E. aerogenes</em>, respectively. The least susceptible bacterial species was <em>S. epidermidis</em>, with significantly higher MIC and MBC values (p < 0.001). Future studies should focus on isolating active compounds, conducting toxicity testing, and performing in vivo validations to assess clinical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8774,"journal":{"name":"Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 103656"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878818125001690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The flora of Ethiopia comprises 6,500 to 7,000 species, with 12–19 % being endemic, including valuable medicinal plants. The study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Pycnostachys abyssinica and Rhamnus prinoides root and leaf extracts against bacteria associated with various infections, particularly in clinical settings. Four different bacterial species associated with human infections in clinical settings namely; Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 25923), Enterobacter aerogenes (ATCC 25922), Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 49619), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were obtained from the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI). The extraction and phytochemical screening were conducted using ethanol, methanol, and aqueous solvents. The antibacterial activity of the extracts was assessed using disc diffusion on agar medium, as well as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) analysis. The qualitative phytochemical analysis of the extracts indicated varied phytochemical profiles among the plant species, their parts, and the extraction solvents used. The most susceptible bacterial species in the present study, based on MIC and MBC values, were P. aeruginosa and E. aerogenes, respectively. The least susceptible bacterial species was S. epidermidis, with significantly higher MIC and MBC values (p < 0.001). Future studies should focus on isolating active compounds, conducting toxicity testing, and performing in vivo validations to assess clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology is the official journal of the International Society of Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology (ISBAB). The journal publishes high quality articles especially in the science and technology of biocatalysis, bioprocesses, agricultural biotechnology, biomedical biotechnology, and, if appropriate, from other related areas of biotechnology. The journal will publish peer-reviewed basic and applied research papers, authoritative reviews, and feature articles. The scope of the journal encompasses the research, industrial, and commercial aspects of biotechnology, including the areas of: biocatalysis; bioprocesses; food and agriculture; genetic engineering; molecular biology; healthcare and pharmaceuticals; biofuels; genomics; nanotechnology; environment and biodiversity; and bioremediation.