“You’ve got the door cracked enough that maybe they can’t quite get it closed again”: A qualitative study of trainers’ perceptions of the impacts of a two-day antiracism training

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dane Emmerling , Deena Hayes-Greene , Bay Love , Alexandra F. Lightfoot , Shelley Golden , Derek M. Griffith , Geni Eng
{"title":"“You’ve got the door cracked enough that maybe they can’t quite get it closed again”: A qualitative study of trainers’ perceptions of the impacts of a two-day antiracism training","authors":"Dane Emmerling ,&nbsp;Deena Hayes-Greene ,&nbsp;Bay Love ,&nbsp;Alexandra F. Lightfoot ,&nbsp;Shelley Golden ,&nbsp;Derek M. Griffith ,&nbsp;Geni Eng","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Diversity training is commonly used by organizations, but evidence of positive impacts is mixed. Antiracism training, which focuses on structural racism, is largely unexamined in the diversity training literature. The Racial Equity Institute (REI) offers a widely implemented antiracism training called Phase 1 which has never been formally evaluated. As a part of larger community-based participatory research partnership, the research team interviewed REI trainers to understand their perceptions of the impacts of the REI training.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews (n = 15) with 58 % of REI trainers who lead Phase 1 to understand their views on what participants gain from the workshop. We used thematic qualitative analysis to understand the changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors at the individual and organizational level that trainers hope to achieve, including the factors that influence the impact.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The interviews revealed that REI trainers expected the training to change participants’ knowledge of and attitudes toward structural racism. Trainers anticipated specific but limited individual and collective behaviors to result from the training. The most important anticipated outcome was that participants learn to connect racial disparities to structural root causes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While the literature on diversity training suggests many possible individual, organization, and outcome-level impacts, REI trainers shared a more limited and consistent set of benefits for how individuals and organizations conceptualize and approach racial inequities. Investigating the perceptions of antiracism trainers is the first step in creating appropriate criteria for evaluating REI Phase 1 and building an evidence-base for antiracism training impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Diversity training is commonly used by organizations, but evidence of positive impacts is mixed. Antiracism training, which focuses on structural racism, is largely unexamined in the diversity training literature. The Racial Equity Institute (REI) offers a widely implemented antiracism training called Phase 1 which has never been formally evaluated. As a part of larger community-based participatory research partnership, the research team interviewed REI trainers to understand their perceptions of the impacts of the REI training.

Design

We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews (n = 15) with 58 % of REI trainers who lead Phase 1 to understand their views on what participants gain from the workshop. We used thematic qualitative analysis to understand the changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors at the individual and organizational level that trainers hope to achieve, including the factors that influence the impact.

Results

The interviews revealed that REI trainers expected the training to change participants’ knowledge of and attitudes toward structural racism. Trainers anticipated specific but limited individual and collective behaviors to result from the training. The most important anticipated outcome was that participants learn to connect racial disparities to structural root causes.

Conclusions

While the literature on diversity training suggests many possible individual, organization, and outcome-level impacts, REI trainers shared a more limited and consistent set of benefits for how individuals and organizations conceptualize and approach racial inequities. Investigating the perceptions of antiracism trainers is the first step in creating appropriate criteria for evaluating REI Phase 1 and building an evidence-base for antiracism training impacts.
“你已经把门敲开了,也许他们再也关不上了”:一项关于培训师对为期两天的反种族主义培训影响的看法的定性研究
多元化培训是组织常用的培训方式,但其积极影响的证据参差不齐。以结构性种族主义为重点的反种族主义培训在多样性培训文献中基本上没有得到研究。种族平等研究所(REI)提供了一种广泛实施的反种族主义培训,称为第一阶段,但从未进行过正式评估。作为更大的社区参与性研究伙伴关系的一部分,研究小组采访了REI培训师,以了解他们对REI培训影响的看法。DesignWe对领导第一阶段的58%的REI培训师进行了定性深入访谈(n = 15),以了解他们对参与者从研讨会中获益的看法。我们使用主题定性分析来了解培训师希望在个人和组织层面实现的知识、态度和行为的变化,包括影响影响的因素。结果访谈显示,REI培训师期望培训能改变参与者对结构性种族主义的认识和态度。培训者期望从培训中得到具体但有限的个人和集体行为。最重要的预期结果是,参与者学会将种族差异与结构性根源联系起来。虽然关于多样性培训的文献表明了许多可能的个人、组织和结果层面的影响,但对于个人和组织如何概念化和处理种族不平等问题,REI培训师分享了一套更有限和一致的好处。调查反种族主义培训人员的看法,是制定适当标准以评估REI第一阶段和建立反种族主义培训影响的证据基础的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信