Uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine and its association with vaccine information and misinformation in Malawi.

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
John Songo, Hannah S Whitehead, Khumbo Phiri, Pericles Kalande, Eric Lungu, Sam Phiri, Joep van Oosterhout, Agnes Moses, Risa M Hoffman, Corrina Moucheraud
{"title":"Uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine and its association with vaccine information and misinformation in Malawi.","authors":"John Songo, Hannah S Whitehead, Khumbo Phiri, Pericles Kalande, Eric Lungu, Sam Phiri, Joep van Oosterhout, Agnes Moses, Risa M Hoffman, Corrina Moucheraud","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-00864-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The information environment may be an important determinant of vaccination and other health behaviors including in low-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a survey to 895 Malawian adults, asking about people's COVID-19 vaccination history and their exposure to information (information sources and tone of this information) and misinformation (exposure to and belief in conspiracy theories) about the COVID-19 vaccine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Just under half (43%) of respondents had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Respondents heard about the COVID-19 vaccine from a median of 7 sources, most commonly from friends and neighbors, health care workers, and radio (each reported by >90%). Social media are the least positively- or neutrally-framed sources of information; and traditional medicine practitioners are the most common negatively-framed source of information. There is less information access among women, rural residents, and people with lower educational attainment. Many people hear conspiracy theories but say that they do not believe them. Hearing more COVID-19 vaccine information is positively associated with COVID-19 vaccination (aOR 1.09, 95% CI [1.03-1.15]), while believing COVID-19 vaccine misinformation is negatively associated (aOR 0.78, 95% CI [0.68-0.89]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccination programs should communicate through multiple information sources and find ways to reach groups with less information exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00864-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The information environment may be an important determinant of vaccination and other health behaviors including in low-income countries.

Methods: We administered a survey to 895 Malawian adults, asking about people's COVID-19 vaccination history and their exposure to information (information sources and tone of this information) and misinformation (exposure to and belief in conspiracy theories) about the COVID-19 vaccine.

Results: Just under half (43%) of respondents had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Respondents heard about the COVID-19 vaccine from a median of 7 sources, most commonly from friends and neighbors, health care workers, and radio (each reported by >90%). Social media are the least positively- or neutrally-framed sources of information; and traditional medicine practitioners are the most common negatively-framed source of information. There is less information access among women, rural residents, and people with lower educational attainment. Many people hear conspiracy theories but say that they do not believe them. Hearing more COVID-19 vaccine information is positively associated with COVID-19 vaccination (aOR 1.09, 95% CI [1.03-1.15]), while believing COVID-19 vaccine misinformation is negatively associated (aOR 0.78, 95% CI [0.68-0.89]).

Conclusions: Vaccination programs should communicate through multiple information sources and find ways to reach groups with less information exposure.

马拉维COVID-19疫苗的使用情况及其与疫苗信息和错误信息的关系
背景:信息环境可能是疫苗接种和其他健康行为的重要决定因素,包括在低收入国家。方法:我们对895名马拉维成年人进行了一项调查,询问人们的COVID-19疫苗接种史以及他们对COVID-19疫苗的信息暴露(信息来源和信息语气)和错误信息(接触和相信阴谋论)。结果:不到一半(43%)的受访者至少接种了一剂COVID-19疫苗。受访者从7个来源中得知COVID-19疫苗,最常见的来源是朋友和邻居、卫生保健工作者和广播(每个来源的报告比例为90%)。社交媒体是最不积极或中立的信息来源;而传统医学从业者是最常见的负面信息来源。妇女、农村居民和受教育程度较低的人获取信息的机会较少。许多人听到阴谋论,但说他们不相信。听到更多COVID-19疫苗信息与接种COVID-19疫苗呈正相关(aOR 1.09, 95% CI[1.03-1.15]),而相信COVID-19疫苗错误信息与接种COVID-19疫苗呈正相关(aOR 0.78, 95% CI[0.68-0.89])。结论:疫苗接种计划应通过多种信息来源进行沟通,并找到接触信息较少的群体的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信