Patient reported voice outcomes following multi-disciplinary approach to botulism toxin for spasmodic dysphonia.

Sahil Kakar, Keshav Kumar Gupta, Emma Richards, Colin Shirley, Paige Bradley, Anita Sonsale
{"title":"Patient reported voice outcomes following multi-disciplinary approach to botulism toxin for spasmodic dysphonia.","authors":"Sahil Kakar, Keshav Kumar Gupta, Emma Richards, Colin Shirley, Paige Bradley, Anita Sonsale","doi":"10.1016/j.otoeng.2025.512261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a debilitating disorder primarily affecting voice production. Current treatment includes repeat botulinum toxin (botox) injections for symptomatic management. The aim of this study is to review the impact of botox injections on patient reported outcome measures (PROM), using a novel and unique quality of life, proforma, and side effects in patients treated at our centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case series evaluated all patients who were treated in our specialised voice clinic, at a single tertiary referral centre between May 2019 and April 2024 with botox for SD. The primary outcome measure was PROM of voice quality weekly post-injection as per a unique proforma. Variables extracted included patient demographics, treatment specifics and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients were included representing 21 (40.4%) males. Forty-two (80.8%) suffered from adductor spasmodic dysphonia with 8 (15.4%) having abductor dysphonia and 1 (1.92%) with mixed dysphonia. Patients with abductor dysphonia had a statistical improvement in voice following dose 2, (1.8-3.0, p = 0.03) and dose 3 (1.4-3.2, p = <0.001). Patients with adductor dysphonia had significant improvements in voice following all doses (2.1-2.9, p = 0.01), (1.9-3.0, p = <0.01) and (2.1-3.0, p = <0.01). The most common complication was a 'breathy voice', ranging from 31.4% to 51.0% but all patients reported this as transient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient reported quality of voice is improved following botox injections for spasmodic dysphonia, and most patients do not suffer from long-term complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93855,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":" ","pages":"512261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2025.512261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a debilitating disorder primarily affecting voice production. Current treatment includes repeat botulinum toxin (botox) injections for symptomatic management. The aim of this study is to review the impact of botox injections on patient reported outcome measures (PROM), using a novel and unique quality of life, proforma, and side effects in patients treated at our centre.

Methods: This retrospective case series evaluated all patients who were treated in our specialised voice clinic, at a single tertiary referral centre between May 2019 and April 2024 with botox for SD. The primary outcome measure was PROM of voice quality weekly post-injection as per a unique proforma. Variables extracted included patient demographics, treatment specifics and complications.

Results: Fifty-two patients were included representing 21 (40.4%) males. Forty-two (80.8%) suffered from adductor spasmodic dysphonia with 8 (15.4%) having abductor dysphonia and 1 (1.92%) with mixed dysphonia. Patients with abductor dysphonia had a statistical improvement in voice following dose 2, (1.8-3.0, p = 0.03) and dose 3 (1.4-3.2, p = <0.001). Patients with adductor dysphonia had significant improvements in voice following all doses (2.1-2.9, p = 0.01), (1.9-3.0, p = <0.01) and (2.1-3.0, p = <0.01). The most common complication was a 'breathy voice', ranging from 31.4% to 51.0% but all patients reported this as transient.

Conclusion: Patient reported quality of voice is improved following botox injections for spasmodic dysphonia, and most patients do not suffer from long-term complications.

多学科肉毒杆菌毒素治疗痉挛性发声障碍后患者报告的声音结果。
目的:痉挛性发声障碍(SD)是一种主要影响发声的衰弱性障碍。目前的治疗包括反复注射肉毒杆菌毒素(botox)以缓解症状。本研究的目的是回顾肉毒杆菌注射对患者报告的结果测量(PROM)的影响,使用一种新颖和独特的生活质量,形式和副作用在我们中心治疗的患者。方法:本回顾性病例系列评估了2019年5月至2024年4月期间在我们的专业语音诊所和单一三级转诊中心接受肉毒杆菌毒素治疗SD的所有患者。主要结果测量是每周注射后语音质量的PROM,根据独特的形式。提取的变量包括患者人口统计、治疗细节和并发症。结果:纳入52例患者,其中男性21例(40.4%)。内收肌痉挛性发声障碍42例(80.8%),外收肌发声障碍8例(15.4%),混合性发声障碍1例(1.92%)。外展音障碍患者在注射剂量2 (1.8 ~ 3.0,p = 0.03)和剂量3 (1.4 ~ 3.2,p = 0.03)后语音质量有统计学改善。结论:注射肉毒杆菌治疗痉挛性音障碍后,患者报告的语音质量得到改善,大多数患者没有出现长期并发症。重要发现:我们的论文补充了什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信