Duaa Salem Alkhayat, Zakaria Yahya Khawaji, Mohammed Abdullah Alahmadi, Nussaiba Yahya Khawaji, Hanan Mohammed Alsayed Alrefaei, Lojain Nasser J Alruwaili, Lujain Hamdan Alghamdi
{"title":"Myths and Misconceptions of Breast Cancer Causation among Female Population of Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Duaa Salem Alkhayat, Zakaria Yahya Khawaji, Mohammed Abdullah Alahmadi, Nussaiba Yahya Khawaji, Hanan Mohammed Alsayed Alrefaei, Lojain Nasser J Alruwaili, Lujain Hamdan Alghamdi","doi":"10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.6.2155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women in Saudi Arabia, yet public awareness remains limited. Given the significant influence of health beliefs on behavior, this study investigated the prevalence of myths surrounding breast cancer causation in the Western region of Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using the modified Cancer Awareness Measure Mythical Causes Scale, a validated tool assessing misconceptions about breast cancer. Participants working in healthcare were excluded to better capture public perceptions. An online questionnaire collected socio-demographic data and assessed breast cancer myths. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed the associations between knowledge and socio-demographic factors, with p-values ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>470 adult women were included in the study. Only 13.2% demonstrated a good level of awareness, correctly identifying ten or more myths. In univariate analysis, young (p = 0.02), single (p = 0.01), and unemployed (p = 0.01) women or knowing someone with breast cancer (p = 0.04) were associated with higher awareness of breast cancer myths. Commonly unrecognized myths included psychological stress (63%), exposure to electromagnetic frequencies (47.7%), food additives or artificial sweeteners (46.8%), living in industrial cities (46.4%), and undergoing breast plastic surgery (46.2%). Notably, women with lower recognition of myths were more likely to believe mammograms could cause breast cancer (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights widespread misconceptions about breast cancer causation among our sample. Educational programs are essential to debunk myths and foster evidence-based awareness in clinical and public environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":55451,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"26 6","pages":"2155-2162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.6.2155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women in Saudi Arabia, yet public awareness remains limited. Given the significant influence of health beliefs on behavior, this study investigated the prevalence of myths surrounding breast cancer causation in the Western region of Saudi Arabia.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the modified Cancer Awareness Measure Mythical Causes Scale, a validated tool assessing misconceptions about breast cancer. Participants working in healthcare were excluded to better capture public perceptions. An online questionnaire collected socio-demographic data and assessed breast cancer myths. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed the associations between knowledge and socio-demographic factors, with p-values ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: 470 adult women were included in the study. Only 13.2% demonstrated a good level of awareness, correctly identifying ten or more myths. In univariate analysis, young (p = 0.02), single (p = 0.01), and unemployed (p = 0.01) women or knowing someone with breast cancer (p = 0.04) were associated with higher awareness of breast cancer myths. Commonly unrecognized myths included psychological stress (63%), exposure to electromagnetic frequencies (47.7%), food additives or artificial sweeteners (46.8%), living in industrial cities (46.4%), and undergoing breast plastic surgery (46.2%). Notably, women with lower recognition of myths were more likely to believe mammograms could cause breast cancer (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study highlights widespread misconceptions about breast cancer causation among our sample. Educational programs are essential to debunk myths and foster evidence-based awareness in clinical and public environments.
期刊介绍:
Cancer is a very complex disease. While many aspects of carcinoge-nesis and oncogenesis are known, cancer control and prevention at the community level is however still in its infancy. Much more work needs to be done and many more steps need to be taken before effective strategies are developed. The multidisciplinary approaches and efforts to understand and control cancer in an effective and efficient manner, require highly trained scientists in all branches of the cancer sciences, from cellular and molecular aspects to patient care and palliation.
The Asia Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention (APOCP) and its official publication, the Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP), have served the community of cancer scientists very well and intends to continue to serve in this capacity to the best of its abilities. One of the objectives of the APOCP is to provide all relevant and current scientific information on the whole spectrum of cancer sciences. They aim to do this by providing a forum for communication and propagation of original and innovative research findings that have relevance to understanding the etiology, progression, treatment, and survival of patients, through their journal. The APJCP with its distinguished, diverse, and Asia-wide team of editors, reviewers, and readers, ensure the highest standards of research communication within the cancer sciences community across Asia as well as globally.
The APJCP publishes original research results under the following categories:
-Epidemiology, detection and screening.
-Cellular research and bio-markers.
-Identification of bio-targets and agents with novel mechanisms of action.
-Optimal clinical use of existing anti-cancer agents, including combination therapies.
-Radiation and surgery.
-Palliative care.
-Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction.
-Health economic evaluations.