Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan and High-Dose Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Rescue Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ju Zhang, Xinzhao Wang, Shujie Song, Xiaoming Zhu, Ting Lv, Lingling Wang, Lei Lei, Yuhui Wang, Yali Lei, Yating Wang, Xiaojing Zhu, Lifeng Zhang, Min Chen, Yongquan Shi
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan and High-Dose Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Rescue Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ju Zhang, Xinzhao Wang, Shujie Song, Xiaoming Zhu, Ting Lv, Lingling Wang, Lei Lei, Yuhui Wang, Yali Lei, Yating Wang, Xiaojing Zhu, Lifeng Zhang, Min Chen, Yongquan Shi","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vonoprazan and amoxicillin dual therapy has demonstrated favorable efficacy in the initial treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan and high-dose amoxicillin (VHA) dual therapy for H. pylori rescue treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an open label, multicenter, non-inferiority, and randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at four institutions in both central and northwestern China. A total of 688 H. pylori-infected patients who had failed previous treatments were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either VHA dual therapy or the tetracycline- and furazolidone-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (TFEB) for 14 days. Eradication rates, adverse event (AE) rates, and the patient compliance were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The eradication rates in the VHA and TFEB groups were 73.8% and 76.2% (p = 0.481), respectively, by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 81.9% and 85.6% (p = 0.215), respectively, by modified ITT (MITT) analysis; and 82.1% and 85.6% (p = 0.248), respectively, by per-protocol (PP) analysis. VHA therapy remained non-inferior to TFEB in ITT, MITT, and PP analyses. The overall AE incidence in the VHA group was significantly lower compared with that in the TFEB group (13.4% vs.. 28.5%, p < 0.001). Patients' compliance was similar between the two groups. A history of multiple prior eradication failures was an independent risk factor (2 failures: OR = 0.566, p = 0.032; ≥ 3 failures: OR = 0.335, p < 0.001) reducing the efficacy of H. pylori rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 14-day VHA dual therapy was non-inferior to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, with a lower incidence of adverse events and good compliance, and may represent an effective alternative for H.pylori rescue treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT06168084).</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vonoprazan and amoxicillin dual therapy has demonstrated favorable efficacy in the initial treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan and high-dose amoxicillin (VHA) dual therapy for H. pylori rescue treatment.

Methods: This was an open label, multicenter, non-inferiority, and randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at four institutions in both central and northwestern China. A total of 688 H. pylori-infected patients who had failed previous treatments were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either VHA dual therapy or the tetracycline- and furazolidone-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (TFEB) for 14 days. Eradication rates, adverse event (AE) rates, and the patient compliance were compared between the two groups.

Results: The eradication rates in the VHA and TFEB groups were 73.8% and 76.2% (p = 0.481), respectively, by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 81.9% and 85.6% (p = 0.215), respectively, by modified ITT (MITT) analysis; and 82.1% and 85.6% (p = 0.248), respectively, by per-protocol (PP) analysis. VHA therapy remained non-inferior to TFEB in ITT, MITT, and PP analyses. The overall AE incidence in the VHA group was significantly lower compared with that in the TFEB group (13.4% vs.. 28.5%, p < 0.001). Patients' compliance was similar between the two groups. A history of multiple prior eradication failures was an independent risk factor (2 failures: OR = 0.566, p = 0.032; ≥ 3 failures: OR = 0.335, p < 0.001) reducing the efficacy of H. pylori rescue therapy.

Conclusion: The 14-day VHA dual therapy was non-inferior to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, with a lower incidence of adverse events and good compliance, and may represent an effective alternative for H.pylori rescue treatment.

Trial registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT06168084).

Vonoprazan和大剂量阿莫西林双重治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效和安全性:一项多中心随机对照试验。
背景:伏诺哌赞和阿莫西林双重治疗在幽门螺杆菌感染的初始治疗中显示出良好的疗效。本研究旨在评价伏诺哌赞联合大剂量阿莫西林(VHA)双药治疗幽门螺杆菌的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项开放标签、多中心、非劣效性、随机对照的临床试验,在中国中部和西北部的四家机构进行。共有688例既往治疗失败的幽门螺杆菌感染患者被随机分配(1:1)接受VHA双重治疗或以四环素和呋喃唑酮为基础的含铋四联治疗(TFEB),为期14天。比较两组的根除率、不良事件(AE)发生率和患者依从性。结果:意向治疗(ITT)分析显示,VHA组和TFEB组的根除率分别为73.8%和76.2% (p = 0.481);修正ITT (MITT)分析分别为81.9%和85.6% (p = 0.215);按方案(PP)分析,分别为82.1%和85.6% (p = 0.248)。在ITT、MITT和PP分析中,VHA治疗仍不逊于TFEB。与TFEB组相比,VHA组的AE总发生率显著降低(13.4% vs。结论:14天VHA双药治疗不低于含铋四药治疗,不良事件发生率低,依从性好,可能是幽门螺杆菌抢救治疗的有效替代方案。试验注册:本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov网站注册(注册号:NCT06168084)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信