A socioecological approach to understanding and positively affecting the intersectionality between disability, race and ethnicity, climate change, and rehabilitation outcomes: A scoping review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-06-21 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13401
Prateek Grover, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, Thiru Annaswamy
{"title":"A socioecological approach to understanding and positively affecting the intersectionality between disability, race and ethnicity, climate change, and rehabilitation outcomes: A scoping review.","authors":"Prateek Grover, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, Thiru Annaswamy","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care outcomes for people with disability may be disproportionately affected by climate change through multiple interlinked factors, which are not well understood. Objective With use of scoping review methodology, this study aimed to model this intersectionality using socioecological (SE) levels to connect person-level rehabilitation diagnoses with systems/policy-level climate change and use this model to identify multilevel factors, rehabilitation outcomes, and responsive strategies from literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of literature was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews methodology from three databases (PubMed Medline, Ovid Medline, CINAHL) using combinations of keywords (climate change), (rehabilitation), (disability), and (race). Logic and SE models were combined to model this intersectionality and create review forms that were used to abstract data. Common themes were collated (results), and additional experiential insight was added to provide contextual relevance (discussion).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 32 deduplicated articles, 11 met inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Rehabilitation outcomes included physical, economic, mental, cognitive, and mortality (person level); rehabilitation services disruption, medical supply delay, emergency capacity overwhelmed (organizational level); and disabled environment (community level). Responsive strategies included education, backup supplies, planning, social support/utility registration (person level); competency assessment/training, physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians (PM&R) assisting patient in planning, providing pre-/postevent services, and establishing cross-coverage (interpersonal level); telerehabilitation, energy/resources conservation, PM&R inclusion in disaster mitigation planning (organization level); building accessible/resilient infrastructure, evidence-based practice guidelines through professional organizations (community level); and research funding, utility companies prioritizing power, and patients/providers included in planning (system/policy level).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Climate change impact on rehabilitation diagnoses such as spinal cord injury and limb loss, as well as intersectionality with rehabilitation outcomes and identified responsive strategies, has been comprehensively modeled using SE levels. Race is not a commonly identified factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PM&R physicians can play a vital role in this intersectionality of disability, climate change, and rehabilitation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health care outcomes for people with disability may be disproportionately affected by climate change through multiple interlinked factors, which are not well understood. Objective With use of scoping review methodology, this study aimed to model this intersectionality using socioecological (SE) levels to connect person-level rehabilitation diagnoses with systems/policy-level climate change and use this model to identify multilevel factors, rehabilitation outcomes, and responsive strategies from literature.

Methods: A scoping review of literature was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews methodology from three databases (PubMed Medline, Ovid Medline, CINAHL) using combinations of keywords (climate change), (rehabilitation), (disability), and (race). Logic and SE models were combined to model this intersectionality and create review forms that were used to abstract data. Common themes were collated (results), and additional experiential insight was added to provide contextual relevance (discussion).

Results: Of 32 deduplicated articles, 11 met inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Rehabilitation outcomes included physical, economic, mental, cognitive, and mortality (person level); rehabilitation services disruption, medical supply delay, emergency capacity overwhelmed (organizational level); and disabled environment (community level). Responsive strategies included education, backup supplies, planning, social support/utility registration (person level); competency assessment/training, physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians (PM&R) assisting patient in planning, providing pre-/postevent services, and establishing cross-coverage (interpersonal level); telerehabilitation, energy/resources conservation, PM&R inclusion in disaster mitigation planning (organization level); building accessible/resilient infrastructure, evidence-based practice guidelines through professional organizations (community level); and research funding, utility companies prioritizing power, and patients/providers included in planning (system/policy level).

Discussion: Climate change impact on rehabilitation diagnoses such as spinal cord injury and limb loss, as well as intersectionality with rehabilitation outcomes and identified responsive strategies, has been comprehensively modeled using SE levels. Race is not a commonly identified factor.

Conclusion: PM&R physicians can play a vital role in this intersectionality of disability, climate change, and rehabilitation outcomes.

理解和积极影响残疾、种族和民族、气候变化和康复结果之间的交叉性的社会生态学方法:范围综述。
背景:气候变化可能通过多种相互关联的因素对残疾人的卫生保健结果产生不成比例的影响,这些因素尚未得到很好的理解。目的利用范围回顾方法,本研究旨在利用社会生态(SE)水平建立这种交叉性模型,将个人层面的康复诊断与系统/政策层面的气候变化联系起来,并利用该模型从文献中识别多层次因素、康复结果和响应策略。方法:使用系统评价首选报告项目和范围评价扩展元分析方法,从三个数据库(PubMed Medline, Ovid Medline, CINAHL)中使用关键词(气候变化),(康复),(残疾)和(种族)组合进行文献范围评价。将逻辑和SE模型结合起来对这种交叉性进行建模,并创建用于抽象数据的审查表单。我们整理了共同的主题(结果),并添加了额外的经验见解以提供上下文相关性(讨论)。结果:32篇去重复文章中,11篇符合定性分析的纳入标准。康复结果包括身体、经济、精神、认知和死亡率(个人水平);康复服务中断,医疗供应延误,应急能力不堪重负(组织一级);残疾人环境(社区级)。应对策略包括教育、备用物资、规划、社会支持/公用事业登记(个人层面);能力评估/培训,物理医学和康复医生(PM&R)协助患者计划,提供事前/事后服务,建立交叉覆盖(人际层面);远程恢复、能源/资源节约、防灾减灾纳入减灾规划(组织一级);建设无障碍/弹性基础设施,通过专业组织(社区一级)建立循证实践指南;研究经费,公用事业公司优先考虑电力,病人/提供者纳入规划(系统/政策层面)。讨论:气候变化对康复诊断的影响,如脊髓损伤和肢体丧失,以及与康复结果和确定的响应策略的交叉性,已经使用SE水平进行了全面建模。种族并不是一个普遍认定的因素。结论:PM&R医生可以在残疾、气候变化和康复结果的交叉性中发挥至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信