Synergistic activity of fosfomycin and flucloxacillin against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro and in vivo assessment.
Alina Nussbaumer-Pröll, Markus Obermüller, Matthias Weiss-Tessbach, Sabine Eberl, Markus Zeitlinger, Bernd Matiba, Christian Mayer, Manuel Kussmann
{"title":"Synergistic activity of fosfomycin and flucloxacillin against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro and in vivo assessment.","authors":"Alina Nussbaumer-Pröll, Markus Obermüller, Matthias Weiss-Tessbach, Sabine Eberl, Markus Zeitlinger, Bernd Matiba, Christian Mayer, Manuel Kussmann","doi":"10.1007/s00430-025-00841-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fosfomycin (FOF) exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and is mainly used in combination therapy. Previous in vitro studies have shown synergistic effects of FOF in combination with flucloxacillin (FLX) against Staphylococcus aureus isolates. This study aims to validate these findings in vitro and investigate the synergistic effect in an in vivo Galleria mellonella model. Five methicillin- and FOF-susceptible isolates (ATCC-29213 & 4 clinical isolates); one methicillin- and FOF-resistant strain (DSMZ-23622) and four methicillin-resistant and FOF-susceptible strains (ATCC-33592 & 3 clinical isolates) were tested with checkerboard assays to assess synergism. Time-kill curves were generated for two MSSA (ATCC 29213 and 231/20) and two MRSA strains (ATCC 33592 and DSMZ 23622). The in vivo efficacy of FOF and/or FLX was evaluated by a G. mellonella survival assay and by determining the total bacterial count (TBC) in hemolymph. Checkerboard assays revealed additive or indifferent effects, with some indicating synergism. Time-kill curves demonstrated higher reduction in TBC with combination therapy compared to monotherapy. In vivo, the combination therapy showed the greatest reduction of TBC in larval haemolymph compared to monotherapy, and the survival assay showed highly synergistic activity of FLX plus FOF against MRSA (ATCC-33592) and MSSA (ATCC 6538), resulting in an average reduction in mortality of 48 and 40%, respectively, compared to monotherapies. Therefore, FOF plus FLX could be an alternative for the calculated or definitive treatment of S. aureus infections without antimicrobial susceptibility results or even for salvage therapy of MRSA infections after treatment failure or necessary discontinuation of classical MRSA drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18369,"journal":{"name":"Medical Microbiology and Immunology","volume":"214 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Microbiology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-025-00841-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fosfomycin (FOF) exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and is mainly used in combination therapy. Previous in vitro studies have shown synergistic effects of FOF in combination with flucloxacillin (FLX) against Staphylococcus aureus isolates. This study aims to validate these findings in vitro and investigate the synergistic effect in an in vivo Galleria mellonella model. Five methicillin- and FOF-susceptible isolates (ATCC-29213 & 4 clinical isolates); one methicillin- and FOF-resistant strain (DSMZ-23622) and four methicillin-resistant and FOF-susceptible strains (ATCC-33592 & 3 clinical isolates) were tested with checkerboard assays to assess synergism. Time-kill curves were generated for two MSSA (ATCC 29213 and 231/20) and two MRSA strains (ATCC 33592 and DSMZ 23622). The in vivo efficacy of FOF and/or FLX was evaluated by a G. mellonella survival assay and by determining the total bacterial count (TBC) in hemolymph. Checkerboard assays revealed additive or indifferent effects, with some indicating synergism. Time-kill curves demonstrated higher reduction in TBC with combination therapy compared to monotherapy. In vivo, the combination therapy showed the greatest reduction of TBC in larval haemolymph compared to monotherapy, and the survival assay showed highly synergistic activity of FLX plus FOF against MRSA (ATCC-33592) and MSSA (ATCC 6538), resulting in an average reduction in mortality of 48 and 40%, respectively, compared to monotherapies. Therefore, FOF plus FLX could be an alternative for the calculated or definitive treatment of S. aureus infections without antimicrobial susceptibility results or even for salvage therapy of MRSA infections after treatment failure or necessary discontinuation of classical MRSA drugs.
期刊介绍:
Medical Microbiology and Immunology (MMIM) publishes key findings on all aspects of the interrelationship between infectious agents and the immune system of their hosts. The journal´s main focus is original research work on intrinsic, innate or adaptive immune responses to viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic (protozoan and helminthic) infections and on the virulence of the respective infectious pathogens.
MMIM covers basic, translational as well as clinical research in infectious diseases and infectious disease immunology. Basic research using cell cultures, organoid, and animal models are welcome, provided that the models have a clinical correlate and address a relevant medical question.
The journal also considers manuscripts on the epidemiology of infectious diseases, including the emergence and epidemic spreading of pathogens and the development of resistance to anti-infective therapies, and on novel vaccines and other innovative measurements of prevention.
The following categories of manuscripts will not be considered for publication in MMIM:
submissions of preliminary work, of merely descriptive data sets without investigation of mechanisms or of limited global interest,
manuscripts on existing or novel anti-infective compounds, which focus on pharmaceutical or pharmacological aspects of the drugs,
manuscripts on existing or modified vaccines, unless they report on experimental or clinical efficacy studies or provide new immunological information on their mode of action,
manuscripts on the diagnostics of infectious diseases, unless they offer a novel concept to solve a pending diagnostic problem,
case reports or case series, unless they are embedded in a study that focuses on the anti-infectious immune response and/or on the virulence of a pathogen.