Synergistic activity of fosfomycin and flucloxacillin against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro and in vivo assessment.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Alina Nussbaumer-Pröll, Markus Obermüller, Matthias Weiss-Tessbach, Sabine Eberl, Markus Zeitlinger, Bernd Matiba, Christian Mayer, Manuel Kussmann
{"title":"Synergistic activity of fosfomycin and flucloxacillin against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro and in vivo assessment.","authors":"Alina Nussbaumer-Pröll, Markus Obermüller, Matthias Weiss-Tessbach, Sabine Eberl, Markus Zeitlinger, Bernd Matiba, Christian Mayer, Manuel Kussmann","doi":"10.1007/s00430-025-00841-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fosfomycin (FOF) exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and is mainly used in combination therapy. Previous in vitro studies have shown synergistic effects of FOF in combination with flucloxacillin (FLX) against Staphylococcus aureus isolates. This study aims to validate these findings in vitro and investigate the synergistic effect in an in vivo Galleria mellonella model. Five methicillin- and FOF-susceptible isolates (ATCC-29213 & 4 clinical isolates); one methicillin- and FOF-resistant strain (DSMZ-23622) and four methicillin-resistant and FOF-susceptible strains (ATCC-33592 & 3 clinical isolates) were tested with checkerboard assays to assess synergism. Time-kill curves were generated for two MSSA (ATCC 29213 and 231/20) and two MRSA strains (ATCC 33592 and DSMZ 23622). The in vivo efficacy of FOF and/or FLX was evaluated by a G. mellonella survival assay and by determining the total bacterial count (TBC) in hemolymph. Checkerboard assays revealed additive or indifferent effects, with some indicating synergism. Time-kill curves demonstrated higher reduction in TBC with combination therapy compared to monotherapy. In vivo, the combination therapy showed the greatest reduction of TBC in larval haemolymph compared to monotherapy, and the survival assay showed highly synergistic activity of FLX plus FOF against MRSA (ATCC-33592) and MSSA (ATCC 6538), resulting in an average reduction in mortality of 48 and 40%, respectively, compared to monotherapies. Therefore, FOF plus FLX could be an alternative for the calculated or definitive treatment of S. aureus infections without antimicrobial susceptibility results or even for salvage therapy of MRSA infections after treatment failure or necessary discontinuation of classical MRSA drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18369,"journal":{"name":"Medical Microbiology and Immunology","volume":"214 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Microbiology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-025-00841-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fosfomycin (FOF) exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and is mainly used in combination therapy. Previous in vitro studies have shown synergistic effects of FOF in combination with flucloxacillin (FLX) against Staphylococcus aureus isolates. This study aims to validate these findings in vitro and investigate the synergistic effect in an in vivo Galleria mellonella model. Five methicillin- and FOF-susceptible isolates (ATCC-29213 & 4 clinical isolates); one methicillin- and FOF-resistant strain (DSMZ-23622) and four methicillin-resistant and FOF-susceptible strains (ATCC-33592 & 3 clinical isolates) were tested with checkerboard assays to assess synergism. Time-kill curves were generated for two MSSA (ATCC 29213 and 231/20) and two MRSA strains (ATCC 33592 and DSMZ 23622). The in vivo efficacy of FOF and/or FLX was evaluated by a G. mellonella survival assay and by determining the total bacterial count (TBC) in hemolymph. Checkerboard assays revealed additive or indifferent effects, with some indicating synergism. Time-kill curves demonstrated higher reduction in TBC with combination therapy compared to monotherapy. In vivo, the combination therapy showed the greatest reduction of TBC in larval haemolymph compared to monotherapy, and the survival assay showed highly synergistic activity of FLX plus FOF against MRSA (ATCC-33592) and MSSA (ATCC 6538), resulting in an average reduction in mortality of 48 and 40%, respectively, compared to monotherapies. Therefore, FOF plus FLX could be an alternative for the calculated or definitive treatment of S. aureus infections without antimicrobial susceptibility results or even for salvage therapy of MRSA infections after treatment failure or necessary discontinuation of classical MRSA drugs.

磷霉素和氟氯西林对甲氧西林敏感和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的协同作用:体外和体内评估
磷霉素(fofoomycin, FOF)具有广谱抗菌活性,主要用于联合治疗。先前的体外研究表明,FOF与氟氯西林(FLX)联合使用对金黄色葡萄球菌具有协同作用。本研究旨在体外验证这些发现,并在体内实验模型中研究其协同效应。5株甲氧西林和fof敏感株(ATCC-29213和4株临床分离株);采用棋盘法检测1株耐甲氧西林和fof菌株(DSMZ-23622)和4株耐甲氧西林和fof敏感菌株(ATCC-33592和3株临床分离株)的协同作用。生成2株MSSA (ATCC 29213和231/20)和2株MRSA (ATCC 33592和DSMZ 23622)的时间杀伤曲线。FOF和/或FLX的体内疗效是通过麦香杆菌存活试验和测定血淋巴细菌总数(TBC)来评估的。棋盘试验显示加性或无影响,有一些表明协同作用。时间杀伤曲线显示联合治疗与单一治疗相比,TBC的减少更高。在体内,与单一治疗相比,联合治疗显示幼虫血淋巴中TBC的减少幅度最大,生存测定显示FLX加FOF对MRSA (ATCC-33592)和MSSA (ATCC 6538)具有高度协同活性,与单一治疗相比,死亡率平均分别降低48%和40%。因此,FOF + FLX可以作为没有抗菌药物敏感性结果的金黄色葡萄球菌感染的计算或确定治疗的替代方案,甚至可以在治疗失败或必须停止经典MRSA药物后用于MRSA感染的补救性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medical Microbiology and Immunology (MMIM) publishes key findings on all aspects of the interrelationship between infectious agents and the immune system of their hosts. The journal´s main focus is original research work on intrinsic, innate or adaptive immune responses to viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic (protozoan and helminthic) infections and on the virulence of the respective infectious pathogens. MMIM covers basic, translational as well as clinical research in infectious diseases and infectious disease immunology. Basic research using cell cultures, organoid, and animal models are welcome, provided that the models have a clinical correlate and address a relevant medical question. The journal also considers manuscripts on the epidemiology of infectious diseases, including the emergence and epidemic spreading of pathogens and the development of resistance to anti-infective therapies, and on novel vaccines and other innovative measurements of prevention. The following categories of manuscripts will not be considered for publication in MMIM: submissions of preliminary work, of merely descriptive data sets without investigation of mechanisms or of limited global interest, manuscripts on existing or novel anti-infective compounds, which focus on pharmaceutical or pharmacological aspects of the drugs, manuscripts on existing or modified vaccines, unless they report on experimental or clinical efficacy studies or provide new immunological information on their mode of action, manuscripts on the diagnostics of infectious diseases, unless they offer a novel concept to solve a pending diagnostic problem, case reports or case series, unless they are embedded in a study that focuses on the anti-infectious immune response and/or on the virulence of a pathogen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信