The Effect of Systemic Statin Intake on Healing of Apical Periodontitis after Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Esha Goel, Shahrah Mkhreb, Elisabetta Cotti, Francesca Ideo, Sadia Niazi, Garrit Koller, Samira Farzadi, Francesco Mannocci
{"title":"The Effect of Systemic Statin Intake on Healing of Apical Periodontitis after Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Esha Goel, Shahrah Mkhreb, Elisabetta Cotti, Francesca Ideo, Sadia Niazi, Garrit Koller, Samira Farzadi, Francesco Mannocci","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This retrospective cohort study compared the radiographic healing of apical periodontitis following root canal treatments and retreatments in patients regularly taking statins versus those who had never taken statins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent root canal treatment or retreatment performed by undergraduate and postgraduate students were included. The patients were divided into two age-matched groups: those who reported regularly taking statins and those who had never taken statins. The outcome was assessed using periapical radiographs taken at least at 1-year post-treatment. Teeth with short root canal fillings were excluded. Single and multiple binary logistic regression tested the association between statin use and radiographic treatment outcome while adjusting for root-canal and restoration quality, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, patient age, tooth type, and follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 teeth were analyzed: 62 from patients taking statins and 60 from patients not taking statins. Using lenient criteria, logistic regression showed no significant difference in healing rates between the statin and control groups (90.3% vs. 90%; OR = 1.04; p = 0.952). However, under strict criteria, patients taking statins had a significantly lower probability of success compared to controls (62.9% vs. 85%; OR = 0.30; p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients taking statins had a lower number of radiographic complete healings than those not taking statins. The results of this study challenge the presumed benefits of systemic statins intake on AP healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.06.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This retrospective cohort study compared the radiographic healing of apical periodontitis following root canal treatments and retreatments in patients regularly taking statins versus those who had never taken statins.

Methods: Patients who underwent root canal treatment or retreatment performed by undergraduate and postgraduate students were included. The patients were divided into two age-matched groups: those who reported regularly taking statins and those who had never taken statins. The outcome was assessed using periapical radiographs taken at least at 1-year post-treatment. Teeth with short root canal fillings were excluded. Single and multiple binary logistic regression tested the association between statin use and radiographic treatment outcome while adjusting for root-canal and restoration quality, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, patient age, tooth type, and follow-up period.

Results: A total of 122 teeth were analyzed: 62 from patients taking statins and 60 from patients not taking statins. Using lenient criteria, logistic regression showed no significant difference in healing rates between the statin and control groups (90.3% vs. 90%; OR = 1.04; p = 0.952). However, under strict criteria, patients taking statins had a significantly lower probability of success compared to controls (62.9% vs. 85%; OR = 0.30; p = 0.008).

Conclusions: Patients taking statins had a lower number of radiographic complete healings than those not taking statins. The results of this study challenge the presumed benefits of systemic statins intake on AP healing.

系统性摄入他汀类药物对非手术根管治疗后根尖牙周炎愈合的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
本回顾性队列研究比较了定期服用他汀类药物的患者与从未服用他汀类药物的患者在根管治疗和再治疗后根尖牙周炎的x线愈合情况。方法:纳入由本科生和研究生进行根管治疗或再治疗的患者。这些患者被分为两组:一组定期服用他汀类药物,另一组从未服用过他汀类药物。结果通过治疗后至少1年的根尖周x线片进行评估。排除短根管充填的牙齿。在调整根管和修复质量、糖尿病、心血管疾病、患者年龄、牙齿类型和随访时间后,单和多二元logistic回归检验了他汀类药物使用与影像学治疗结果的关系。结果:共分析了122颗牙齿,其中服用他汀类药物患者62颗,未服用他汀类药物患者60颗。使用宽松的标准,逻辑回归显示他汀类药物组和对照组的治愈率无显著差异(90.3% vs 90%;Or = 1.04;P = 0.952)。然而,在严格的标准下,与对照组相比,服用他汀类药物的患者成功率明显较低(62.9% vs. 85%;Or = 0.30;P = 0.008)。结论:与未服用他汀类药物的患者相比,服用他汀类药物的患者x线完全愈合率较低。这项研究的结果挑战了系统性摄入他汀类药物对AP愈合的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信