The Concomitant Therapy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants with Amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kazuhiko Kido, Mikiko Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Shiga, Masayuki Hashiguchi
{"title":"The Concomitant Therapy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants with Amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Kazuhiko Kido, Mikiko Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Shiga, Masayuki Hashiguchi","doi":"10.1177/10742484251351148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) significantly increases the concentrations of DOACs and may increase the bleeding risks. Multiple real-world studies compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus the DOAC alone, but their main findings were contradictory.MethodsA meta-analysis compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus DOACs monotherapy. Database searches through May 1, 2025, were performed. The primary outcome was major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, any bleeding, all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding.ResultsThis meta-analysis included a total of nine studies. There were no significant differences in major bleeding between the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOAC and DOAC monotherapy groups (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.98, 1.27; <i>P</i> = .09; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 64%). No significant differences in any bleeding (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.88, 1.57; <i>P</i> = .27; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 77%), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.84, 1.11; <i>P</i> = .65; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 56%), and intracranial bleeding (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; <i>P</i> = .05; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 32%) were also found between the two groups. No significant differences in stroke or systemic embolism were found between the two groups (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74, 1.00; <i>P</i> = .05; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 34%).Conclusion and RelevanceThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs did not significantly increase the bleeding risks or decrease the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to the DOAC monotherapy. The drug-drug interactions between amiodarone and DOACs may not be clinically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"30 ","pages":"10742484251351148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484251351148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) significantly increases the concentrations of DOACs and may increase the bleeding risks. Multiple real-world studies compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus the DOAC alone, but their main findings were contradictory.MethodsA meta-analysis compared the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs versus DOACs monotherapy. Database searches through May 1, 2025, were performed. The primary outcome was major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, any bleeding, all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding.ResultsThis meta-analysis included a total of nine studies. There were no significant differences in major bleeding between the concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOAC and DOAC monotherapy groups (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.98, 1.27; P = .09; I2 = 64%). No significant differences in any bleeding (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.88, 1.57; P = .27; I2 = 77%), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.84, 1.11; P = .65; I2 = 56%), and intracranial bleeding (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; P = .05; I2 = 32%) were also found between the two groups. No significant differences in stroke or systemic embolism were found between the two groups (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74, 1.00; P = .05; I2 = 34%).Conclusion and RelevanceThe concomitant therapy of amiodarone and DOACs did not significantly increase the bleeding risks or decrease the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared to the DOAC monotherapy. The drug-drug interactions between amiodarone and DOACs may not be clinically significant.

直接口服抗凝剂与胺碘酮联合治疗心房颤动:荟萃分析。
背景胺碘酮与直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)合用可显著增加DOACs浓度,并可能增加出血风险。多个现实世界的研究比较了胺碘酮和DOAC的联合治疗与DOAC的单独治疗,但他们的主要发现是矛盾的。方法荟萃分析比较胺碘酮与DOACs联合治疗与DOACs单药治疗的疗效。数据库搜索执行到2025年5月1日。主要结局是大出血。次要结局包括中风或全身性栓塞、任何出血、全因死亡率、胃肠道出血和颅内出血。结果本荟萃分析共纳入9项研究。胺碘酮与DOAC联合治疗组与DOAC单药治疗组大出血发生率差异无统计学意义(OR 1.12;95% ci 0.98, 1.27;p = .09;i2 = 64%)。出血差异无统计学意义(OR 1.18;95% ci 0.88, 1.57;p = .27;I2 = 77%),胃肠道出血(OR 0.97;95% ci 0.84, 1.11;p = .65;I2 = 56%),颅内出血(OR 1.14;95% ci 1.00, 1.30;p = 0.05;I2 = 32%)。两组在卒中或全身性栓塞方面无显著差异(or 0.86;95% ci 0.74, 1.00;p = 0.05;i2 = 34%)。结论及相关性与DOAC单药治疗相比,胺碘酮与DOAC联合治疗未显著增加出血风险,也未显著降低卒中或全身栓塞的风险。胺碘酮与DOACs之间的药物相互作用可能没有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信