Development of a reliability criterion for the binocular Esterman visual field test.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kazunori Hirasawa, Akari Nagayama-Ito, Chiho Maruta-Akaishizawa, Nobuyuki Shoji
{"title":"Development of a reliability criterion for the binocular Esterman visual field test.","authors":"Kazunori Hirasawa, Akari Nagayama-Ito, Chiho Maruta-Akaishizawa, Nobuyuki Shoji","doi":"10.1007/s10384-025-01238-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the repeatability of the binocular Esterman visual field (bEVF) test and develop a corresponding reliability criterion based on repeatability-associated factors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-five glaucoma patients underwent two bEVF tests on the same day using a Humphrey field analyzer. The repeatability of the bEVF was assessed by the agreement rate for seen and unseen points over all test points between the first and second tests. Factors associated with the repeatability were analyzed with multivariate linear regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for those associated factors to identify the reliability criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean agreement rate was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.9%, 99.2%). A total of 44 patients (46.3%), 75 patients (78.9%), and 88 patients (92.6%) had agreement rates of more than 90%, 85%, and 80%, respectively. The false positive (FP) response rate of the bEVF test was negatively associated with the agreement rate (p<0.01). The best cutoff value according to the maximum Youden index for the FP response rate of the bEVF test was >7.1% (sensitivity = 71.0% and specificity = 88.0%), while the cutoff value based on a fixed 95% specificity was >12.1% (sensitivity = 28.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An approximately 90% agreement rate existed for the bEVF test when applied to glaucoma patients. The FP response rate was associated with the repeatability of the bEVF test, and 8% or at least 13% may serve as a useful reference to ensure an agreement rate of 80% or higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01238-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of the binocular Esterman visual field (bEVF) test and develop a corresponding reliability criterion based on repeatability-associated factors.

Study design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Methods: Ninety-five glaucoma patients underwent two bEVF tests on the same day using a Humphrey field analyzer. The repeatability of the bEVF was assessed by the agreement rate for seen and unseen points over all test points between the first and second tests. Factors associated with the repeatability were analyzed with multivariate linear regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for those associated factors to identify the reliability criterion.

Results: The mean agreement rate was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.9%, 99.2%). A total of 44 patients (46.3%), 75 patients (78.9%), and 88 patients (92.6%) had agreement rates of more than 90%, 85%, and 80%, respectively. The false positive (FP) response rate of the bEVF test was negatively associated with the agreement rate (p<0.01). The best cutoff value according to the maximum Youden index for the FP response rate of the bEVF test was >7.1% (sensitivity = 71.0% and specificity = 88.0%), while the cutoff value based on a fixed 95% specificity was >12.1% (sensitivity = 28.6%).

Conclusion: An approximately 90% agreement rate existed for the bEVF test when applied to glaucoma patients. The FP response rate was associated with the repeatability of the bEVF test, and 8% or at least 13% may serve as a useful reference to ensure an agreement rate of 80% or higher.

双目Esterman视野测试可靠性准则的建立。
目的:评价双眼Esterman视野(bEVF)测试的可重复性,并基于可重复性相关因素制定相应的信度标准。研究设计:前瞻性横断面研究。方法:95例青光眼患者在同一天使用Humphrey现场分析仪进行两次bEVF测试。bEVF的可重复性是通过第一次和第二次测试之间所有测试点上可见点和未见点的一致性来评估的。采用多元线性回归分析影响重复性的因素。对相关因素进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,确定信度标准。结果:平均一致性率为88.9%(95%可信区间[CI]: 73.9%, 99.2%)。44例(46.3%)、75例(78.9%)和88例(92.6%)患者的一致性率分别大于90%、85%和80%。bEVF试验的假阳性(FP)应答率与符合率呈负相关(p7.1%(敏感性= 71.0%,特异性= 88.0%),而基于固定95%特异性的截断值为>12.1%(敏感性= 28.6%)。结论:bEVF检测用于青光眼患者的符合率约为90%。FP反应率与bEVF测试的重复性有关,8%或至少13%可以作为有用的参考,以确保80%或更高的一致性率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信