A single center experience of intraocular pressure control with glaucoma drainage device use in pediatric and adult patients.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Armin Garmany, Sepideh Jamali Dogahe, Kit Knier, Felix Kung, Jason Sargent, David Hodge, Cheryl Khanna
{"title":"A single center experience of intraocular pressure control with glaucoma drainage device use in pediatric and adult patients.","authors":"Armin Garmany, Sepideh Jamali Dogahe, Kit Knier, Felix Kung, Jason Sargent, David Hodge, Cheryl Khanna","doi":"10.1007/s10384-025-01214-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective cohort compared the cumulative probability of success for glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation in pediatric and adult patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled adult and pediatric patients who had received a GDD between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2017.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of success in the pediatric and adult patients. Successful intraocular pressure (IOP) control was defined as (i) a 20% reduction from baseline and (ii) IOP>6 and <18. Inadequate IOP control and failure were defined as a violation of these two criteria over two consecutive visits. Cox proportional hazards models enabled assessing the influence of sex, GDD location, and GDD type on IOP control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 425 adult eyes from 372 individuals and 41 pediatric eyes from 28 individuals were included. The median follow-up time was 55 months for adults and 87 months for children. Superior temporal GDD placement was most employed for both (p=0.16). Adults were more likely to receive a Baerveldt 350 (p=0.04) and children were more likely to receive an Ahmed S2 (p<0.001). Adults and children had a median survival time of 2.99 and 0.82, respectively, and did not have a statistically significant difference in GDD failure rate (p=0.18). Additionally, sex, GDD location, and GDD type did not affect the success rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children and adults had a similar cumulative probability of success following GDD implantation. This study found that GDD type, GDD location, and glaucoma type did not influence the probability of successful IOP control.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01214-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective cohort compared the cumulative probability of success for glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation in pediatric and adult patients.

Study design: This retrospective study enrolled adult and pediatric patients who had received a GDD between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2017.

Methods: Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of success in the pediatric and adult patients. Successful intraocular pressure (IOP) control was defined as (i) a 20% reduction from baseline and (ii) IOP>6 and <18. Inadequate IOP control and failure were defined as a violation of these two criteria over two consecutive visits. Cox proportional hazards models enabled assessing the influence of sex, GDD location, and GDD type on IOP control.

Results: A total of 425 adult eyes from 372 individuals and 41 pediatric eyes from 28 individuals were included. The median follow-up time was 55 months for adults and 87 months for children. Superior temporal GDD placement was most employed for both (p=0.16). Adults were more likely to receive a Baerveldt 350 (p=0.04) and children were more likely to receive an Ahmed S2 (p<0.001). Adults and children had a median survival time of 2.99 and 0.82, respectively, and did not have a statistically significant difference in GDD failure rate (p=0.18). Additionally, sex, GDD location, and GDD type did not affect the success rate.

Conclusions: Children and adults had a similar cumulative probability of success following GDD implantation. This study found that GDD type, GDD location, and glaucoma type did not influence the probability of successful IOP control.

青光眼引流装置在儿童和成人患者中控制眼压的单中心经验。
目的:本回顾性队列比较了青光眼引流装置(GDD)植入术在儿童和成人患者中的累积成功率。研究设计:本回顾性研究纳入了1985年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间接受GDD治疗的成人和儿科患者。方法:采用Kaplan-Meier法估计儿童和成人患者的累计成功率。成功的眼内压(IOP)控制被定义为(i)较基线降低20%,(ii) IOP bb[6]。结果:共包括372个人的425只成人眼睛和28个人的41只儿童眼睛。成人的中位随访时间为55个月,儿童为87个月。在这两种情况下,颞部GDD放置最多(p=0.16)。成人更有可能接受Baerveldt 350 (p=0.04),儿童更有可能接受Ahmed S2 (p结论:儿童和成人在GDD植入后具有相似的累积成功概率。本研究发现GDD类型、GDD位置和青光眼类型不影响IOP控制成功的概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信